Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new index - Relative Publication Growth (RPG) - was suggested for characterizing the annual increase of publications in different selected periods. It has been revealed that the mean citedness of papers (“Chance for Citedness”) increases parallel with increasing RPG and growing mean number of references in papers. The number of citations attainable by a paper published in a given journal may be estimated by multiplying the resp. Journal Citedness Factor (JCF) with the Garfield Factor of the resp. journal. The JCF values may represent the aging of information whereas GF-s the potential frequency of citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldi, S., L. L. Hargens (1997), Re-examining Price's conjectures on the structure of reference networks. Results from the special relativity, spatial diffusion modeling and role analysis literatures, Social Studies of Science, 27: 669–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomperts, M. C. (1968), The law of constant citation for scientific literature, Journal of Documentation, 24: 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, H. W. ( 1971), Science: Growth and Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. J. (1988), Citation analysis of astronomical literature: Comments on citation half-lives, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 100: 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R. (1994), The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance, Scientometrics, 29: 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. De Solla (1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science, In: C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds), Communication among Scientists and Engineers, Heath Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1992), Why am I not cited or why are multi-authored papers more cited then others? Journal of Documentation, 48: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., W. GlÄnzel (1983), Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications, Scientometrics, 5: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, E. R., F. W. Lancaster (1987), Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies, Journal of Information Science, 13: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1998), Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model, Scientometrics, 43: 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1999), Ratio of short term and long term impact factors and similarities of chemistry journals represented by references, Scientometrics, 46: 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2000), Publication velocity, publication growth and impact factor: An Empirical Model. In: (B. Cronin, H. B. Atkins (Eds), The Web of Knowledge, A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, ASIS Monograph Series, Medford, New Jersey: Information Today Inc. pp. 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2000), Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators, Current Science, 79: 602–612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinkler, P. Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness. Scientometrics 54, 421–434 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016086500801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016086500801

Keywords

Navigation