Abstract
Care Theory is a growing schoolof ethics that starts with the assumption ofthe relational nature of human beings. Incontrast, the dominant assumption of theautonomous view of human nature has made itdifficult to integrate ``relational'' aspects ofreality into the realm of political actionrelated to agriculture. Variables such ascommunity attachment, community vitality andrichness, and environmental ``fit'' cannot beincorporated into policy because such variablesare perceived to be tainted by ``attachment,''and compromise rational judgement. Feministagricultural theorists parallel Care Theory andhave the potential of extending Care Theory tohuman-nature relations. Both taken togetherenrich each other and through that process,contribute to our understanding of the moralchoices embedded in agricultural systems,particularly hog production systems, the focusof this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry, W. (1990). What Are People for? Berkeley: North Point Press.
Beus, C. E. and R. E. Dunlap (1990). “Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate.” Rural Sociology55: 590–616.
Blomley, N. K. (1992). “The business of mobility: Geography, liberalism, and the charter of rights.” The Canadian Geographer 36: 236–253.
Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. Contradictions of Modernity, Volume 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Curry-Roper, J. M. (1997). “Community-level worldviews and the sustainability of agriculture.” In B. Ilbery, Q. Chiotti, and T. Rickard (eds.), Agricultural Restructuring and Sustainability: A Geographic Perspective (pp. 101–115). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Curry-Roper, J. M. (2000). “Embeddedness in place: Its role in the sustainability of a rural farm community in Iowa.” Space and Culture4/5: 204–222.
DeLind, L. B. (1998). “Parma: a story of hog hotels and local resistance.” In K. M. Thu and E. P. Durrenberger (eds.), Pigs, Profits, and Rural Communities (pp. 23–38). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Donham, K. J. (1998). “The impact of industrial swine production on human health.” In K. M. Thu and E. P. Durrenberger (eds.), Pigs, Profits, and Rural Communities (pp. 73–83). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Flora, C. B. (1992). “Reconstructing agriculture: The case for local knowledge.” Rural Sociology 57: 92–97.
Fowler, S. (1993). “Communities, organizations, and people.” Pro Rege June: 20-32.
Furuseth, O. J. (1997). “Sustainability issues in the industrialization of hog production in the United States.” In B. Ilbery, Q. Chiotti, and T. Rickard (eds.), Agricultural Restructuring and Sustainability: A Geographical Perspective (pp. 293–311). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Goldschmidt, W. (1998). “Conclusion: The urbanization of rural America.” In K. M. Thu and E. P. Durrenberger (eds.), Pigs, Profits, and Rural Communities (pp. 183–198). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Goldschmidt, W. (1978). As You Sow: Three Studies in the Social Consequences of Agribusiness. Montclair, New Jersey: Allenheld, Osmun & Co.
Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.
Hagedoorn, A. L. (1939). Animal Breeding. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.
Haraway, D. (1988). “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.” Feminist Studies14: 575–599.
Hart, J. F. and C. Mayda (1998). “The industrialization of livestock production in the United States.” Southeastern Geographer: 3858-3878.
Hassanein, N. and J. R. Kloppenburg, Jr. (1995). “Where the grass grows again: Knowledge exchange in the sustainable agriculture movement.” Rural Sociology 60: 721–740.
Held, V. (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture Society, and Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ikerd, J. E. (1998). “Sustainable agriculture, rural economic development, and large-scale swine production.” In K. M. Thu and E. P. Durrenberger (eds.), Pigs, Profits, and Rural Communities (pp. 157–169). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Jackson, L. L. (1998). “Large-scale swine production and water quality.” In K. M. Thu and E. P. Durrenberger (eds.), Pigs, Profits, and Rural Communities (pp. 103–119). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Jackson, W. (1987). Alters of Unhewn Stone: Science and the Earth. New York: North Point Press.
Jackson, W. (1996). Becoming Native to This Place. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
Jackson, W. (1999). Notes from the Wes Jackson Lecture and Consultation, November 4. auJay, M. (1998). Sidney Hellman Ehrman Professor of History, University of California at Berkeley. “Must Justitia Be Blind: Challenges of Images to the Law.” Presentation at Calvin College on April 21, NEH-funded Visual Rhetoric Series.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kloppenburg, J. Jr. (1991). “Social theory and the de/ reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture.” Rural Sociology 56: 519–548.
Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture (2000a). “Coupling swine technologies: Swine system options.” Center Progress Report 2000. Summaries of 13 research and educational projects in: Agriculture and Communities, Crop Management, Livestock and Pest Management 9: 32–35. Ames, Iowa: Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.
Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture (2000b). “Hoops group.” In 1999-2000 Annual Report (pp. 14–15). Ames, Iowa: Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.
Lyson, T. A. and R. Welsh (1993). “The production function, crop diversity, and the debate between conventional and sustainable agriculture.” Rural Sociology 58: 424–439.
Manning, R. C. (1992). Speaking from the Heart: A Feminist Perspective on Ethics. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Miller, L. (2000). “Producers generate ideas for additional hoop research.” Leopold Letter: A Newsletter of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture 12: 10.
Nickerson, C. (1999). “Low-polluting pig touted as triumph.” The Grand Rapids Press June 27: A15.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2000). Consulation with Care Theory Working Group, Calvin College, January 14, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Reisner, A. (1992). “Tracing the linkages of world views, information handling, and communications vehicles.” Agriculture and Human Values9: 4–16.
Schreur, E. H. (2000). “The swine crisis and the church.” Perspectives15: 3.
Tronto, J. C. (1994). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Wolgast, E. H. (1980). Equality and the Rights of Women. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Wood, J. T. (1994). Who Cares? Women, Care, and Culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Curry, J.M. Care Theory and ``caring'' systems of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 19, 119–131 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016074832696
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016074832696