Skip to main content
Log in

The Quantum Phase Problem: Steps Toward a Resolution

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining the observable φ canonically conjugate to the number observable N has long been an open problem in quantum theory. The problem stems from the fact that N is bounded from below. In a previous work we have shown how to define the absolute phase observable Φ≡|φ| by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of x and p like variables. Here we show that also from the classical point of view, there is no rigorous definition for the phase even though it's absolute value is well defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 411 (1968). R. Lynch, Phys. Rep. 256, 367 (1995). D. A. Dubin, M. A. Dubin, M. A. Hennings, and T. B. Smith, Int. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 225 (1995). D. T. Pegg and S. M. Barnett, J. Mod. Opt. 44 225 (1997). D. G. Welsch, W. Vogel and T. Opatrny, Prog. in Opt. 39 63 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Gour, quant-ph/0102092.

  3. R. G. Newton, Ann. Phys. 124, 327 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Moshinsky and T. H. Seligman, Ann. Phys. 114, 243 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. London, Z. Phys. 37, 915 (1926); Z. Phys. 40, 193 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 114, 243 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. M. Nieto, Physica Scripta, T 48, 5 (1993) (special issue devoted to: Quantum Phase and Phase Dependent Measurements).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Susskind and J. Glogower, Phys. 1, 49 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Kastrup, quant-ph/0005033. M. Bojowald and T. Strobl, J. Math. Phys. 41, 2537 (2000). T. Hakioglu and E. Tepedelenlioglu, J. Phys. A 33, 6357 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Shapiro and S. R. Shepard, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3795 (1991). M. J. W. Hall, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 809 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1426 (1991). Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2579 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. G. Raymer, M. Beck, and D. F. McAlister, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1137 (1994). M. G. Raymer, J. Cooper, and M. Beck, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4617 (1993). G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, Nature 387, 471 (1997). G. Breitenbach and S. Schiller, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2207 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, J. Mod. Opt. 39, 2121 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 387 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Judge, Phys. Lett. 5, 189 (1963); Nuovo Cimento 31, 332 (1964). D. Judge and J. T. Lewis, Phys. Lett. 5, 190 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Galindo, Lett. Math. Phys. 8, 495 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. T. Pegg and S. M. Barnett, Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989). S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, J. Mod. Opt. 36, 7 (1989).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gour, G. The Quantum Phase Problem: Steps Toward a Resolution. Foundations of Physics 32, 907–926 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016059229336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016059229336

Navigation