Skip to main content
Log in

Dual Families of Interacting Particle Systems on Graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Theoretical Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple condition for IPS (Interacting Particle Systems) with nearest neighbor interactions to be self-dual is given. It follows that any IPS with the contact transition and no spontaneous birth is self-dual. It is shown that families of IPS exist in which every IPS is dual to every other, and such that for every pair of IPS, one is a “thinning” of the other. Further, all such IPS have the same form for an equilibrium distribution when expressed in terms of survival probabilities. Convergence results from a wide class of initial infinite measures follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arratia, R. (1981). Limiting point processes for rescaling of coalescing and annihilating random walks on ℤd. Ann. Probab. 9, 909–936.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandt, C. (1999). The geometry of a parameter space of interacting particle systems. J. Stat. Phys., to appear.

  3. Belitsky, V., Ferrari, P., Konno, N., and Liggett, T. M. (1997). A strong correlation inequality for contact processes and oriented percolation. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 67, 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bezuidenhout, C., and Grimmett, G. (1990). The critical contact process dies out. Ann. Probab. 18, 1462–1482.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bramson, M., Ding, W. D., and Durrett, R. (1991). Annihilating branching processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 27, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bramson, M., and Gray, L. (1985). The survival of the branching annihilating random walk. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 68, 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickman, R. (1989). Universality and diffusion in non-equilibrium critical phenomena. Phys. Rev. B 40, 7005–7010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, T. E. (1974). Contact interactions on a lattice. Ann. Probab. 2, 969–988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holley, R., and Liggett, T. M. (1975). Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting systems and the voter model. Ann. Prob. 3, 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holley, R., and Stroock, D. (1979). Dual processes and their applications to infinite interacting systems. Adv. in Math. 32, 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konno, M. (1994). Phase Transitions of Interacting Particle Systems, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sudbury, A. W. (1990). The branching annihilating process: an interacting particle system. Ann. Probab. 18, 581–601.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sudbury, A. W., and Lloyd, P. (1995). Quantum operators in classical probability theory: II. The concept of duality in interacting particle systems. Ann. Probab. 23, 4, 1816–1830.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sudbury, A. W., and Lloyd, P. (1997). Quantum operators in classical probability theory: IV. Quasi-duality and thinnings of interacting particle systems. Ann. Probab. 25, 1, 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sudbury, A. W. (1997). The convergence of the biased annihilating branching process and the double-flipping process in ℤd. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 68, 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sudbury, A. W. (1998). A method for finding bounds on critical values for non-attractive interacting particle systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 8323–8331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sudbury, A. Dual Families of Interacting Particle Systems on Graphs. Journal of Theoretical Probability 13, 695–716 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806427774

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806427774

Navigation