Skip to main content
Log in

Agents' perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various structural factors influenceorganic farmer decision-making. Analyses that combinestructure and agency provide an opportunity forunderstanding farmers' perceptions of the political,economic, and social ``world'' in which they operate.Rich conversational interviews, conducted with twentycertified organic farmers in Illinois and analyzedwith multiple qualitative methods, show how farmersmediate structural concerns. In addition to political,economic, and social structures, a fourth structure isneeded. Indeed these organic farmers emphasize theimportance of ecological factors in theirdecision-making. Within the perceived economic,political, social, and ecological structures, numeroustopics (i.e., marketing, policy, family, ecosystems)and subtopics (i.e., diversification, farm programs,traditions, soils) exist. Farmers' quotations providedetailed information of how they view and mediatestructures in their daily on-farm decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (1992). “What do cases do?” In C. Ragin and H.Becker (eds.), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundation of Social Inquiry(pp. 53-82). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. (1980). The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beus, C. and R. Dunlap (1991). “Measuring adherence to alter-native vs. conventional agricultural paradigms: A proposed scale.” Rural Sociology56: 432-466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. and S. Biklen (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods(2nd edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman (1997). “From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California.” Sociologia Ruralis37: 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultena, G. and E. Hoiberg (1986). “Sources of information and technical assistance for farmers in controlling soil erosion.” In S. Lovejoy and T. Napier (eds.), Conserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research(pp. 71-82). Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P., J. Bacon, and U. Toensmeyer (1994). “Pesticide residue concerns and shopping location likelihood.” Agribusi-ness10: 491-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry-Roper, J. (1997). “Community-level worldviews and the sustainability of agriculture.” In B. Ilbery, Q. Chiotti, and T.Rickard (eds.), Agricultural Restructuring and Sustainability: A Geographical Perspective(pp. 101-115). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1995). Organic Food and Fiber: An Analysis of 1994 Certified Production in the United States. Washington, DC: USDA Agricultural Marketing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duram, L. (1997). “A pragmatic study of conventional and alter-native farmers in Colorado.” Professional Geographer49: 202-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duram, L. (1998). “Organic agriculture in the United States: Current status and future regulation.” Choices: the Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues2: 34-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA 1998 (1996). Water Quality Report to Congress. Website: http://www.epa.gov/305b/.

  • Friedmann, H. (1986). “Patriarchal commodity production.” Social Analysis10: 185-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradictions in Social Analysis.Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R. (1980). An Introduction to Behavioural Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., L. A. Brown, and H. Williamson (1972). “Behavioural approaches in geography: An overview.” Australian Geographer12: 59-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (1998). “Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture.” Antipode30: 135-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1980). City and Society: An Outline of Urban Geography. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. (1962). “Hazard and choice perception in flood plain management.” University of Chicago, Department Research Paper 78. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsching, P. and T. Hoban (1990). “Relationships between information sources and farmers' conservation perceptions and behavior.” Society and Natural Resources3: 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockeretz, W. (1995). “Organic farming in Massachusetts: An alternative approach to agriculture in an urbanized State.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation50: 663-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockeretz, W. (1997). “Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the Northeastern United States.” Biological Agriculture and Horticulture14: 13-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockeretz, W. and P. Madden (1987). “Midwestern organic farming: A ten-year follow-up.” American Journal of Alter-native Agriculture2: 57-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., T. Marsden, and S. Whatmore (1994). Regulating Agriculture. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (1991). “Theoretical issues in the continuity of petty commodity production.” In S. Whatmore, P. Lowe, and T. Marsden (eds.), Rural Enterprise: Shifting Perspectives on Small-Scale Production(pp. 12-33). London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, K. (1993). “National policy options and strategies to encourage sustainable agriculture: Lessons from the 1990 farm bill.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture8: 158-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. and A. Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, P. (1986). “My Own Boss?”Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Foods Merchandiser (1997). Organic Sales. Boulder, Colorado: New Hope Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (1989). Alternative Agricul-ture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgitt, S. and P. Petrzelka (1994). “Making sustainable agri-culture the new conventional agriculture: Social change and sustainability.” In J. Hatfield and D. Karlen (eds.), Sustain-able Agriculture Systems(pp. 261-285). Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. and G. Hollander (1997). “Sustainable technolo-gies, sustainable farms: Farms, households and structural change.” In B. Ilbery, Q. Chiotti, and T. Rickard (eds.), Agri-cultural Restructuring and Sustainability: A Geographical Perspective(pp. 55-72). Wallingford, UK: CAB Interna-tional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. (1992). Prairie Patrimony: Family, Farming, and Community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (1997). “Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in Ireland." Sociologia Ruralis37: 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Targeting Environmental Priorities in Agriculture: Reforming Program Strategies. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G. (1997). “Images of success: How Illinois farmers define the successful farmer.” Rural Sociology62: 48-68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duram, L.A. Agents' perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors. Agriculture and Human Values 17, 35–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007632810301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007632810301

Navigation