Skip to main content
Log in

Impossible Policy Evaluations and Impossible Conclusions: A Comment on Koper and Roth

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Britt, C., Kleck, G., and Bordua, D. (1996). A reassessment of the D.C. gun law: Some cautionary notes on the use of interrupted time series designs for policy impact assessment. Law Soc. Rev. 30: 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P., and Ludwig, J. (1997). Guns in America, Police Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G. (2000). Policy magic: Reducing gun homicide by banning guns killers almost never use, Unpublished paper.

  • U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1995). Crime in the United States 1994-Uniform Crime Reports. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (1996). Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1994. Month. Vital Stat. Rep. 45(3, Suppl.): 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleck, G. Impossible Policy Evaluations and Impossible Conclusions: A Comment on Koper and Roth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17, 75–80 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007574415289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007574415289

Keywords

Navigation