Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptationism and the Power of Selection

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Brandon, R.: forthcoming, 'Organism and Environment, Revisited', to appear in R. Singh, C. Krimbas, D. Paul and J. Beatty (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.

  • Brandon, R. N. and Rausher, M. D.: 1996, 'Testing Adaptationism: A Comment on Orzack and Sober', American Naturalist 148, 189-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W.: 1977, Biology in the Ninetheenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1969, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882 (N. Barlow, ed.), Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1911a, 'Adaptation', in Paul Monroe (ed.), A Cyclopedia of Education, Macmillan, New York, 1911. Reprinted in J. A. Boydston, (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Volume 6. How We Think, and Selected Essays, 1910–1911, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 364–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1911b, 'Environment and Organism', in Paul Monroe (ed.), A Cyclopedia of Education, Macmillan, New York, 1911. Reprinted in J. A. Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Volume 6. How We Think, and Selected Essays, 1910–1911, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1929, Experience and Nature (revised edition), Dover, New York, 1958.

  • Dupre, J. (ed.): 1987, The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1996, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: forthcoming a, 'Three Kinds of Adaptationism', to appear in Orzack and Sober, forthcoming.

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: forthcoming b, “Organism, Environment and Dialectics”, to appear in R. Singh, C. Krimbas, D. Paul and J. Beatty (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.

  • Gould, S. J.: 1980, 'The Hardening of the Synthesis', in E. Mayr and W. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a Critique of the Adaptationist Program', Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B205, 581-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. and Gray, R.: 1994, 'Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation', Journal of Philosophy 91, 277-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. and Gray, R.: 1997, 'Replicator II: Judgement Day', Biology and Philosophy 12, 471-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. S.: 1987, 'Why Not the Best?' in Dupre (1987), pp. 77-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. and Lewontin, R. C.: 1985, The Dialectical Biologist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia, New York.

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1982, 'Organism and Environment', in H. C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development and Culture: Press in Evolutionary Epistemology, Wiley, New York, pp. 151-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1983, 'The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution', reprinted in Levins and Lewontin (1985), pp. 85–106.

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1991, Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1978, 'Optimization Theory in Evolution', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 31-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S. H. and Sober, E.: 1994, 'Optimality Models and The Test of Adaptationism', American Naturalist 143, 361-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S. H. and Sober, E.: forthcoming, Optimality and Adaptationism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Oyama, S.: 1985, The Ontogeny of Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W.: 1802, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity Collected from the Appearances of Nature, Reprinted Gregg, Farnborough, 1970.

  • Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P.: forthcoming, Sex and Death: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology.

  • Sterelny, K., Smith, K. and Dickison, M.: 1996, 'The Extended Replicator', Biology and Philosophy 11, 377-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R.: 1991, Dewey and American Democracy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S.: 1932, 'The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution', Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1, 356-366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey-Smith, P. Adaptationism and the Power of Selection. Biology & Philosophy 14, 181–194 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006630232690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006630232690

Navigation