Skip to main content
Log in

A Benchmark Method for the Propositional Modal Logics K, KT, S4

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lot of methods have been proposed – and sometimes implemented – for proof search in the propositional modal logics K, KT, and S4. It is difficult to compare the usefulness of these methods in practice, since in most cases no or only a few execution times have been published. We try to improve this unsatisfactory situation by presenting a set of benchmark formulas. Note that we do not just list formulas, but give a method that allows us to compare different provers today and in the future. As a starting point we give the results we obtained when we applied this benchmark method to the Logics Workbench (LWB). We hope that the discussion of postulates concerning ATP benchmark helps to obtain improved benchmark methods for other logics, too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balsiger, P. and Heuerding, A.: Comparison of theorem provers for modal logics-introduction and summary, in H. de Swart (ed.), TABLEAUX’ 98, LNAI 1397, 1998, pp. 25-26.

  2. Catach, L.: Tableaux: A general theorem prover for modal logics, J. Automated Reasoning 7 (1991), 489-510.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Swart, H. (ed.): Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, TABLEAUX’ 98, LNAI 1397, Springer, 1998.

  4. Demri, S.: Uniform and non uniform strategies for tableaux calculi for modal logics, J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 5(1) (1995), 77-96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giunchiglia, F. and Sebastiani, R.: Building decision procedures for modal logics from propositional decision procedures-the case study of modal K, in CADE 96, LNCS, 1996.

  6. Halpern, J. and Moses, Y.: A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief, Artif. Intell. 54 (1992), 319-379.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heuerding, A., Jäger, G., Schwendimann, S. and Seyfried, M.: Propositional logics on the computer, in P. Baumgartner, R. Hähnle, and J. Posegga (eds.), Tableaux 95, LNCS 918, 1995, pp. 310-323.

  8. Heuerding, A. and Schwendimann, S.: On the modal logic K plus theories, in H. Kleine Büning (eds.), CSL 95, LNCS 1092, 1996, pp. 308-319.

  9. Heuerding, A., Seyfried, M. and Zimmermann, H.: Efficient loop-check for backward proof search in some non-classical propositional logics, in P. Miglioli, U. Moscato, D. Mundici, and M. Ornaghi (eds.), Tableaux 96, LNCS 1071, 1996, pp. 210-225.

  10. Pelletier, F.: Seventy-five problems for testing automatic theorem provers, J. Automated Reasoning 2 (1986), 191-216.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selman, B., Levesque, H. and Mitchell, D.: A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems, in Proceedings 10th AAAI, 1992, pp. 47-59.

  12. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, S. and Yemenis, T.: The TPTP problem library, in A. Bundy (ed.), CADE 12, LNCS 814, 1994, pp. 252-266.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balsiger, P., Heuerding, A. & Schwendimann, S. A Benchmark Method for the Propositional Modal Logics K, KT, S4. Journal of Automated Reasoning 24, 297–317 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006249507577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006249507577

Navigation