Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Commodification of Information and the Extension of Proprietary Rights into the Public Domain: Recent Legal (Case and Other) Developments in the United States

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the National Information Infra- structure develops new avenues for information products and services will open. Creating, identifying and protecting the information market space is a critical component to the success of information product and service developments. As a result, the producers of those products and service seek to protect their proprietary interest in the underlying information. However, these actions have broader consequences: Attempts to extend legal protection to basic facts and other public domain information demonstrate that the public information space is slowly being reduced. Reviewing several information controversies as case studies is fruitful. Not only for assessing current trends in information disputes (warfare) but can form the basis for establishing several predictors useful in determining when future information ownership controversies may develop and result in the loss of public information space. One set of predictors helps define the information controversy and is descriptive. The second set of predictors characterizes the marketplace environment. It provides further nuance to the economic factors that force information owners to seek legal remedy. Identifying instances where both models suggest a change in information rights or ownership is most likely to result in the critical loss of access to public information space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACLU v. Miller: 977 F. Supp. 1228 (N.D. Ga. 1997).

  • Akdezie: 1998, ‘To Link or Not to Link’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technolog 11, 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, D. Y.: 1998, ‘Taming the Wild West: The Scope of Copyright Protection for Compilations after Matthew Bender & Co., Inc. v. West Publishing Co.’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 38, 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. L.: 1997, ‘A Thoughtful and Practical Analysis of Database Protection Under Copyright Law, and a Critique of Sui Generis Protection’, Law-Technology 30, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T. W.: 1998, ‘Fair Use v. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management and Copyright' Fair Use Doctrine’, North Carolina Law Review 76, 557–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branscomb, A. W.: 1994, Who Owns Information: From Privacy to Public Access (Basic Books, Inc., NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan v. Meyers: 128 U.S. 617 (1888).

  • CMB Worldwide, Inc. v. American Legends: 49 D 109607 (D. Ind. July 22, 1996).

  • Consent Decree: 1996, ‘Public Comments and Plaintiff's Response, United States of America v. The Thomson Corporation and West Publishing Company’, Federal Register 61, 53, 385–53, 457.

  • Earthlink Network v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.: BC 167502 (Calif. Super. Ct. May 7, 1997).

  • Effross, W. A.: 1998, ‘Withdrawal of the Reference: Rights, Rules, and Remedies for Unwelcomed Web-Linking’, South Carolina Law Review 49, 651–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin-Noren, N.: 1997, ‘Copyright Policy and the Limits of Freedom of Contract (Digital Content: New Products and New Business Models)’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 12, 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. N.: 1997, ‘Hotlinking & Framing Pitfalls’, Intellectual Property Today (December), at 28. (Available in the LEXIS-NEXIS, Legnew Library.)

  • Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.: 499 U.S. 340 (1991).

  • Final Judgment: United States of America v. The Thomson Corporation and West Publishing Company, 1997 U.S. Dist LEXIS 2790 (S.D.N.Y. 1997).

  • Fleischmann, E.: 1988, ‘The Impact of Digital Technology on Copyright Law’, New England Law Review 23, 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Music Corporation v. CompuServe, Inc.: 93 Civ. 8253 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (settled November 7, 1995).

  • Freeling, K. and J. E. Reeling: 1997, ‘Frame Liability Clouds the Internet' Future: Lawsuit Protects Web Programming Trick’, New York Law Journal (May 19), at S5.

  • Futuredontics v. Applied Anagrmaics, Inc.: 1998, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2265, 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) (D. C. D. Cal. 1998), aff 'd 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17012 (9th Cir. 1998) (unpublished opinion).

  • Goldstone, D. J.: 1998, ‘A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Cyber Forum: Public vs. Private in Cyberspace Speech’, Colorado Law Review 69, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnick, A. J.: 1997a, ‘“Framing”: Internet Equivalent of Pirating?’, New York Law Journal (April 4), at 5.

  • Hartnick, A. J.: 1997b, ‘Framing': Internet Equivalent of Pirating? (part 2)’, New York Law Journal (April 11), at 5.

  • Hill v. Gateway 2000: 105 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 1997).

  • House Report, 1998, Collections of Information Antipiracy Act, H.R. 2652, 105th Congress, 2d Session, Report No. 105-525.

  • H.R. 3531, 104th Congress, 2nd Session, Database Investment and Intellectual Property Antipiracy Act of 1996 (1996).

  • H.R. 354, 106th Congress, 1st Session, Collections of Information Antipiracy Act of 1999 (1999).

  • IDEA, 1998, ‘Link Law on the Internet: A Panel Discussion’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 38, 197–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • International News Service v. Associated Press (INS): 248 U.S. 215 (1918).

  • Jackson, M.: 1997, ‘Linking Copyright to Homepages’, Federal Communications Law Journal 49, 731–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. and D. G. Post: 1997, ‘The Rise of Law on the Global Network’, in B. Kahin and C. Nesson (eds.), Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure (MIT University Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjala, D. A.: 1992, ‘Copyright and Misappropriation’, University of Dayton Law Review 17, 885–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, D. J.: 1998, ‘Note, Comments & Legislative Reviews: State Regulation of Anonymous Internet Use after ACLU of Georgia v. Miller’, Arizona State Law Journal 30, 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnow, C. E. A.: 1997, Future Codes: Essays in Advanced Computer Technology and the Law (Artech House Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.: 1996, ‘Freedom of Speech on the Electronic Village Green: Applying the First Amendment Lessons of Cable Television to the Internet’, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 6, 23–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester J. R. and P. A. Lewis: 1998, ‘Hyperlinks: A Form of Protected Expression?’, National Law Journal ( January 26), at C10–C12.

  • Kuester, J. R. and P. A. Nieves: 1998, ‘Hyperlinks, Frames and Meta-Tags: An Intellectual Property Analysis’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 38, 243–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieb, A. D.: 1997, ‘NBA v. Motorola and Stats, Inc.: The Second Circuit Properly Limits the “Hot News Doctrine”’, John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law 16, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, J.: 1994, ‘The Herbert Tenzer Memorial Conference: Copyright in the Twenty-First Century: The Exclusive Right to Read’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 13, 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, J.: 1996, ‘Revising Copyright Law for the Information Age (Symposium: Innovation and the Information Environment)’, Oregon Law Review 75, 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew Bender & Co. and Hyperlaw, Inc. v. West Publishing Company: 1997 U.S. Dist LEXIS 6915 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), aff 'd 8 F.3d 693 (2nd Cir. 1997).

  • Mayberry, J.: 1998, ‘Copyrights: Database Protection Legislation (The Database Antipiracy Act: Friend or Foe of Academic Freedom)’, Computer Law & Online Industry Litigation Reporter ( January 6), at 7.

  • McManis, C. R.: 1997, ‘Do Not Support “Privatizing” Copyright’, National Law Journal (October 13), at A24.

  • Neuburger, J. D.: 1997, ‘New Media, the Internet and the Law: Staying Interactive in the Hi-Tech Environment – An Overview of Key Recent Developments’, in The Fourth Annual Seminar on Legal and Business Aspects of the INTERNET (Law Journal Seminars-Press, New York, NY), pp. 61–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmer, R. T.: 1996, Information Law (Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. L.: 1989, ‘New Technology and the Limitations of Copyright Law: An Argument for Finding Alternative to Copyright Legislation in an Era of Rapid Technological Change’, Chicago-Kent Law Review 65, 307–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Basketball Association v. Motorola, Inc. and Sports Team Analysis: (NBA), 931 F. Supp. (S.D.N.Y. 1996), 939 F. Supp. 1071 (S.D.N.Y. 1996); rev'd 105 F.3d 841 (2nd Cir. 1997).

  • Oasis Publishing Company v. West Publishing Company: 924 F. Supp. 918 (D. Minn. 1996); No 92-2887 (8th Cir. 1996) (settled July 24, 1997).

  • ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg: 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996), rev'g 908 F.supp. 640 (W.D. Wis. 1996).

  • Public Law 105–298: 112 Stat. 2827 (1999), (Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act).

  • Public Law 105–304: 112 Stat. 2860 (1998) (Digital Millennium Copyright Act).

  • Raysman, R. and P. Brown.: 1996, ‘Internet Copyright Developments’, New York Law Journal ( January 9), at 3.

  • Raysman, R. and P. Brown: 1997, ‘Dangerous Liaisons: The Legal Risks of Linking Web Sites’, New York Law Journal (April 8), at 3.

  • Ressensohn, J.: 1998, ‘The Devil' in the Details: The Quest for Legal Protection of Computer Databases and the Collections of Information Act, H.R. 2652’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 38, 439–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. A.: 1997, ‘Digital Information and Property and Product: U.C.C. Article 2b (Symposium: Copyright Owners' Rights and Users' Privileges on the Internet)’, Dayton Law Review 22, 621–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenoer, J.: 1997, Cyberlaw: The Law of the Internet (Springer-Verlag Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.: 1990, ‘Digital Media and the Changing Face of Intellectual Property Law’, Rutgers Computer and High Technology Law Journal 16, 323–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffey, T.: 1996, ‘A Crack in the West Monopoly?’, New Jersey Law Journal (December 2), at 1.

  • Shetland Times Ltd, v. Dr. Jonathon Wills and Zetnews Ltd.: 1 EIPLR 723 (Oct. 23, 1996) (settled Nov. 11, 1997) (case history available at www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/law/112797law.html and settlement available at www.sjetlan-times.co.uk/st/daily/dispute/htm.).

  • Street, F. L.: 1997, Law of the Internet (LEXIS Law Publishing, Charlottesville, VA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, K. D.: 1998, Internet and Online Law (Law Journal Seminars-Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, R. G. and N. Webb: 1996, ‘If Idea is Public Domain, Don't Complain’, National Law Journal (October 14), at A22.

  • Talbot, J. N.: 1997, ‘Fats, Copyright, Unfair Competition and Contracts; Will NBA v. Motorola Lead to Shrink Wrap Television?’, The Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 15, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, J. N.: 1997, New Media: Intellectual Property, Entertainment, and Technology Law (Clark, Boardman, Callaghan, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticketmaster Corp. v. Microsoft, Inc.: 97-3055 (C. D. Cal. 1997) (settled January 22, 1999).

  • United States Copyright Office: 1997, Report on Legal Protection for Databases: A Report of the Register of Copyrights (United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC).

  • Washington Post v. TotalNews: 97 Civ. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (settled June 5, 1997).

  • Weiss, B. D.: 1997, ‘Internet Linking and Framing Cases Challenge IP Legal Framework’, in The Fourth Annual Seminar on Legal and Business Aspects of the INTERNET (Law Journal Seminars-Press, New York, NY), pp. 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C.: 1997, ‘Case Note and Comment: NBA V. Motorola & Stats, Inc.: Real-Time Basketball Scores – News or Property?’, Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 7, 288–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • West: 1996, The Next Step (West Publishing promotional material # 5-9639-2) (West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc., 700 F.2d 1219 (8th Cir. 1986).

  • West Publishing Company v. On Point Solutions, Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20040 (N.D. Ga. 1994).

  • White Paper: 1995, Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

  • Wyman, J. H.: 1996, ‘Freeing the Law: Case Reporter Copyright and the Universal Citation System’, Florida State Law Review 24, 217–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Library and Information Science, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, 2400 East Hartford Avenue, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, U.S.A. E-mail

    Tomas A. Lipinski

Authors
  1. Tomas A. Lipinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lipinski, T.A. The Commodification of Information and the Extension of Proprietary Rights into the Public Domain: Recent Legal (Case and Other) Developments in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 22, 63–80 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006112321280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006112321280

Search

Navigation