Skip to main content
Log in

Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly many business practitioners and academics are turning to religious sources as a way of approaching and answering difficult questions related to business ethics. There now exists a relatively large literature which attempts to integrate business decisions and religious values. The integration, however, is not without difficulties. For many, religious ethics provides the basis and the ultimate authority for a morally meaningful life. Yet, at the same time, in certain contexts, it is often inappropriate to rely and to publicly justify action on the basis of these ethics. With this difficulty in mind, the main goal of this paper is to answer the following specific question: Is a religiously grounded business ethics consistent with the idea of political liberalism? While this question is fundamental and straight-forward, to date it has received little, if any, careful attention. The characterization of business corporations as quasi-public, discussed in the body of the paper, implies that political liberalism may dictate that there exist situations in which invoking religious business ethics is inappropriate. The point is that once one removes the assumption of business as a purely private matter, the justification of a religiously grounded ethics in the context of a politically liberal democracy becomes problematic. On the other hand, such an assumption should not be taken to imply that all religiously grounded business ethics are always inappropriate. As this paper demonstrates, it is far from obvious that even government officials need observe a complete separation between religion and state in formulating, justifying, or expressing public policies, even policies leading to so-called coercive results. If so, it follows that managers of quasi-public institutions may, under appropriate and limited circumstances, invoke and rely upon a religious, albeit private, world-view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audi, Robert: 1989 (summer), ‘The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 259–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert: 1991 (winter), ‘Religious Commitment and Secular Reason: A Reply to Professor Weithman’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary: 1976, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, Norman E.: 1991, ‘Challenging the Egoistic Paradigm’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, Richard T.: 1986, ‘Theological Ethics and Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, Mark: 1977 (Sep-Oct), ‘Pinto Madness’, Mother Jones,18, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1989, The New Realities: In Government and Politics/ In Economics and Business/In Society and World View(Harper and Row, Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald: 1985, A Matter of Principle(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, David: 1995, ‘An Employee Bill of Rights’, first printed 1977, reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, William M. and R. Edward Freeman: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, first printed 1988, reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E.

  • Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 145–154.

  • Frederick, William C., James E. Post and Keith Davis: 1992, Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics, Seventh Edition (McGraw Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton: 1970 (Sep 13), ‘A Friedman Doctrine - The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 32–33, and 123–125.

  • Friedman Milton and Rose Friedman: 1980, Free to Choose(Avon Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich: 1955, The Sane Society(Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1994, ‘In Defense of a Paradox’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 423–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, Kent: 1988 Religious Convictions and Political Choice(Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, Kent: 1990, ‘Religious Convictions and Political Choice: Some Further Thoughts’, Depaul Law Review 39,1019–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy: 1993, ‘The Challenge of Multi-culturalism in Political Ethics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(3), 171–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, David: 1978, Joy and Responsibility: Israel, Modernity and the Renewal of Judaism(Ben-Zwi-Ponser and The Shalom Harman Institute, Jerusalem).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberg, Will: 1951, Judaism and Modern Man(Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1951, The Sabbath: Its Meaning for Modern Man(Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1955, God in Search of Man: A Philosophy of Judaism(Harper and Row Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1965, Who is Man? (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Michael: 1995, ‘The Ford Pinto’, in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick (eds.), Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Martin Luther: 1986, ‘Letter From Birmingham City Jail’, first printed April 1963, reprinted in A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings of Martin Luther King, Jr.edited by James Melvin Washington (Harper & Row, Publishers, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Aaron and Moses L. Pava: 1999, Jewish Business Ethics: The Firm and Its Stakeholders( Jason Aronson, Inc., Northvale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, Moses L.: 1998, ‘Religious Business Ethics As Interpretation: A Jewish Perspective’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 10, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1993, Political Liberalism(Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, Joseph B.: 1965, The Lonely Man of Faith(Doubleday, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, Joseph B: 1967, ‘Confrontation’, in A Treasury of “Tradition”,Edited by Norman Lamm and Walter S. Wurzburger (Hebrew Publishing Co., New York), pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, Joseph B: 1983, Halakhic Man(Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solum, Lawrence B: 1990, ‘Faith and Justice’, Depaul Law Review 39,1083–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Christopher: 1995, ‘Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior’, first printed in 1975, Reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Leonard J.: 1996, ‘Citizenship and Democracy: The Ethics of Corporate Lobbying’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2), 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, Paul J.: 1991 (Winter), ‘The Separation of Church and State: some Questions for Professor Audi’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20,52–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pava, M.L. Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1633–1652 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006023619939

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006023619939

Keywords

Navigation