Abstract
We propose that the choice between the auxiliaries hebben ‘have’ and zijn ‘be’ in Dutch is determined by a particular semantic feature of verbs. In particular we propose a feature of meaning [IEPS] for ‘inferable eventual position or state’ that characterizes whether the action denoted by the verb allows us to determine the eventual position or state of the verb's highest argument. It is argued that only verbs which exhibit the feature [+IEPS] or which obtain the feature compositionally in the syntax select zijn as their auxiliary. Our analysis is then compared to a number of other analyses of auxiliary selection in Dutch.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackema, Peter: 1995, Syntax Below Zero, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Baayen, Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, and Hendrick van Rijn: 1993, The CELEX Lexical Data Base (CD-ROM), Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych Verbs and θ-Theory’, NLLT 6, 291–352.
Borer, Hagit: 1993, ‘The Projection of Arguments’, in University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, GLSA, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 19–48.
Bouchard, Denis: 1995, The Semantics of Syntax, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Comrie, Bernard: 1976, Aspect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Den Dikken, Marcel: 1994, ‘Auxiliaries and Participles’, in M. Gonzalez (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 24, GLSA, Amherst, pp. 65–79.
Den Dikken, Marcel: 1995, Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions, Oxford University Press, New York.
de Vooys, C. G. N.: 1957, Nederlandse Spraakkunst (Dutch Grammar), J.B. Wolters, Groningen.
Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Everaert, Martin: 1992, ‘Auxiliary Selection in Idiomatic Constructions’, unpublished manuscript, University of Utrecht, Research Institute for Language and Speech.
Geerts, G., W. Haeseryn, J. de Rooij, and M. C. van den Toorn: 1984, Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Wolters Noordhoff, Groningen.
Geerts, G. and H. Heestermans: 1995, Van Dale Groot Woorderboek der Nederlandse Taal, Van Dale Lexicografie, Utrecht.
Hoekstra, Teun: 1984, Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government Binding Theory, Foris, Dordrecht.
Honselaar, Wim: 1987, ‘Zijn vs. Hebben in het samengesteld perfectum’, De Niewe Taalgids 80, 55–68.
van Hout, Angeliek: 1996, Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and Its Acquisition, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
van Hout, Angeliek, Janet Randall, and Jurgen Weissenborn: 1993, ‘Acquiring the Unergative-Unaccusative Distinction’, in Maaike Verrips and Anton Wijnen (eds.), The Acquisition of Dutch, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 1, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 79–120.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1987, ‘The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 369–411.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1991, ‘Parts and Boundaries’, Cognition 41, 9–45.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1996, ‘The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out. Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quantification in English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 305–354.
Kayne, Richard: 1993, ‘Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection’, Studia Linguistica 47, 3–31.
Levelt, Willem J. M.: 1989, Speaking. From Intention to Articulation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav: 1995, Unaccusativity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lieber, Rochelle: 1992, Deconstructing Morphology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lieber, Rochelle: 1997, ‘The Suffix-ize in English: Implications for Morphology’, in Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, and Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, CSLI, Stanford, California, pp. 12–34.
Lieber, Rochelle and Harald Baayen: 1993, ‘Verbal Prefixes in Dutch: A Study in Lexical Conceptual Structure’, in Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 51–78.
Pinker, Steven: 1989, Learnability and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pustejovsky, James: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’, Cognition 41, 47–81.
Pustejovsky, James: 1995, The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Rooij, Jaap de: 1988, Van hebben naar zijn, Het gebruik van hebben en zijn in de voltooide tijden (actief) van zijn, gaan, vergeten en verliezen in standaardtaal, ouder Nederlands en dialect, Publikaties van het P. J. Meertens-Instituut, Amsterdam.
Sinclair, John (ed.): 1995, Collins Cobuild English Dictionary, Harper Collins Publishers, London.
Sorace, Antonella: 1993, ‘Incomplete vs. Divergent Representations of Unaccusativity in Non-native Grammars of Italian’, Second Language Research 9, 22–47.
Talmy, Leonard: 1985, ‘Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms’, in Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–149.
Tenny, Carol: 1987, Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Tenny, Carol: 1994, Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Inferface, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Van Valin, Robert: 1990, ‘Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity’, Language 66, 221–260.
Vendler, Zeno: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Verkuyl, Henk: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Verkuyl, Henk: 1989, ‘Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 39–94.
Zaenen, Annie: 1993, ‘Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating Syntax and Lexical Semantics’, in James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 129–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lieber, R., Baayen, H. A Semantic Principle of Auxiliary Selection in Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15, 789–845 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005897301225
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005897301225