Does Peer Review Predict the Performance of Research Projects in Health Sciences?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Peer review is a basic component of the scientific process, but its performance has seldom been evaluated systematically. To determine whether pre-approval characteristics of research projects predicted the performance of projects, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all 2744 single-centre research projects financed by the Spanish Health Research Fund since 1988 and completed before 1996. Peer review scores of grant applications were significant predictors of performance of funded projects, and the likelihood of production was also higher for projects with a basic research component, longer duration, higher budget or a financed research fellow. Funding agencies should monitor their selection process and assess the performance of funded projects to design future strategies in supporting health sciences research.
- Does Peer Review Predict the Performance of Research Projects in Health Sciences?
Volume 47, Issue 1 , pp 11-23
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Neurology Unit, General Hospital, Segovia, Spain
- 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National School of Public Health Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- 3. Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- 4. Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- 5. Neuropathology Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- 6. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
- 7. Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- 8. Institute for Advanced Sociologic Research, Madrid, Spain