Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling Issues in Forest Succession Modelling

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews scaling issues in forest succession modelling, focusing on forest gap models. Two modes of scaling are distinguished: (1) implicit scaling, i.e. taking scale-dependent features into account while developing model equations, and (2) explicit scaling, i.e. using procedures that typically involve numerical simulation to scale up the response of a local model in space and/or time. Special attention is paid to spatial upscaling methods, and downscaling is covered with respect to deriving scenarios of climatic change to drive gap models in impact assessments. When examining the equations used to represent ecological processes in forest gap models, it becomes evident that implicit scaling is relevant, but has not always been fully taken into consideration. A categorization from the literature is used to distinguish four methods for explicit upscaling of ecological models in space: (1) Lumping, (2) Direct extrapolation, (3) Extrapolation by expected value, and (4) Explicit integration. Examples from gap model studies are used to elaborate the potential and limitations of these methods, showing that upscaling to areas as large as 3000 km2 is possible, given that there are no significant disturbances such as fires or insect outbreaks at the landscape scale. Regarding temporal upscaling, we find that it is important to consider migrational lags, i.e. limited availability of propagules, if one wants to assess the transient behaviour of forests in a changing climate, specifically with respect to carbon storage and the associated feedbacks to the atmospheric CO2 content. Regarding downscaling, the ecological effects of different climate scenarios for the year 2100 were compared at a range of sites in central Europe. The derivation of the scenarios is based on (1) imposing GCM grid-cell average changes of temperature and precipitation on the local weather records; (2) a qualitative downscaling technique applied by the IPCC for central and southern Europe; and (3) statistical downscaling relating large-scale circulation patterns to local weather records. Widely different forest compositions may be obtained depending on the local climate scenario, suggesting that the downscaling issue is quite important for assessments of the ecological impacts of climatic change on forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amthor, J.S.: 1995, ‘Terrestrial higher-plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle’, Global Change Biology 1, 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arp, P.A. and Oja, T.: 1997, ‘A forest soil vegetation atmosphere model (ForSVA), I: Concepts’, Ecol. Modelling 95, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonan, G.B. and Sirois, L.: 1992, ‘Air temperature, tree growth, and the northern and southern range limits to Picea mariana’, J. Veg. Sci. 3, 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F.H. and Likens, G.E.: 1979, Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem, Springer, New York a.o., 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.F. and Wallis, J.R.: 1972, ‘Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth’, J. Ecol. 60, 849–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J.R.: 1956, ‘Gap-phase replacement in a maple-basswood forest’, Ecology 37, 598–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H.: 1994, On the ecology of mountainous forests in a changing climate: A simulation study, Ph.D. Thesis no. 10638, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland, 258 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H.: 1996, ‘A simplified forest model to study species composition along climate gradients’, Ecology 77, 2055–2074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H.: 1997, ‘Sensitivity of forests in the European Alps to future climatic change’, Clim. Res. 8, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H. and Cramer, W.: 1998, ‘Improving the behaviour of forest gap models along drought gradients’, For. Ecol. Manage. 103, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H. and Fischlin, A.: 1994, ‘Comparing the behaviour of mountainous forest succession models in a changing climate’, in: Beniston, M. (ed.), Mountain environments in changing climates, Routledge, London, 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H. and Martin, P.: 1995, ‘How physics and biology matter in forest gap models’, Clim. Change 29, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H.K.M. and Solomon, A.M.: 1995, ‘The use of a European forest model in North America: A study of ecosystem response to climate gradients’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H.K.M. and Solomon, A.M.: 1998, ‘Towards a unified gap model for the global temperate forests’, Ecol. Applications, submitted.

  • Bugmann, H., Fischlin, A. and Kienast, F.: 1996a, ‘Model convergence and state variable update in forest gap models’, Ecol. Modelling 89, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H., Yan Xiaodong, Sykes, M.T., Martin, Ph., Lindner, M., Desanker, P.V. & Cumming, S.G.: 1996b, ‘A comparison of forest gap models: Model structure and behaviour’, Clim. Change 34, 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann, H., Grote, R., Lasch, P., Lindner, M. and Suckow, F.: 1997, ‘A new forest gap model to study the effects of environmental change on forest structure and functioning’, in: Mohren, G.M.J., Kramer, K. & Sabaté, S. (eds.), Global Change Impacts on Tree Physiology and Forest Ecosystems, Forestry Sciences Vol. 52, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 255–261.

  • Bürger, G.: 1996, ‘Expanded downscaling for generating local weather scenarios’, Clim. Res. 7, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubasch, U., Hasselmann, K., Höck, H., Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., Santer, B. and Sausen, R.: 1992, ‘Time-dependent greenhouse warming computations with a coupled ocean-atmosphere model’, Climate Dynamics 8, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.T.: 1959, The vegetation of Wisconsin, Univ. of Wisonsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, R.E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P.J. and Wilson, M.F.: 1986, Biosphere-at-mosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR community climate model, Tech Note TN-275+STR, Natl. Center for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo., 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer, J.R. and Field, C.B.: 1993, Scaling physiological processes: Leaf to globe, Academic Press, San Diego a.o., 388 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischlin, A., Bugmann, H. and Gyalistras, D.: 1995, ‘Sensitivity of a forest ecosystem model to climate parametrization schemes’, Environ. Pollut. 87, 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M.: 1981, ‘Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology’, Bioscience 31, 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, A.D., Shugart, H.H. and Running, S.W.: 1993, ‘A physiology-based gap model of forest dynamics’, Ecology 74, 792–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, A.D., Stevens, A.K., Knox, R.G. and Cannell, M.G.R.: 1997, ‘A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (HYBRID v3.0)’, Ecol. Modelling 95, 249–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, R.: 1998, ‘Integrating long-term adaptations into physiological forest growth modeling. II. Allocation and mortality’, For. Ecol. Manage., in press.

  • Gyalistras, D., Storch, H. von, Fischlin, A. and Beniston, M.: 1994, ‘Linking GCM generated climate scenarios to ecosystems: Case studies of statistical downscaling in the Alps’, Clim. Res. 4, 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I.C.: 1996, ‘A general model for the light use efficiency of primary production by terrestrial ecosystems’, Functional Ecology 10, 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (eds.): 1990, Climate change — the IPCC scientific assessment, Report prepared for IPCC by Working Group 1, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge a.o., 365 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M.A.: 1991, ‘Use of individual-based forest succession models to link physiological whole-tree models to landscape-scale ecosystem models’, Tree Physiol. 9, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. and Andersen, M.: 1988, ‘Spatial aspects of species interactions: The wedding of models and experiments’, in: Hastings, A. (ed.), Community Ecology, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 77, pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, R.E., Morgan, P. and Running, S.W.: 1996, FIRE-BGC — A mechanistic ecological process model for simulating fire succession on confierous forest landscapes of the northern Rocky Mountains, USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-RP-484, 122 pp.

  • Kienast, F.: 1991, ‘Simulated effects of increasing CO2 on the successional characteristics of Alpine forest ecosystems’, Landscape Ecology 5, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W.: 1991, ‘Translating models across scales in the landscape’, in: Turner, M.G. and Gardner, R.H. (eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology, Ecological Studies, Springer, New York a.o., Vol. 82, pp. 479–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W., Emanuel, W.R. and O'Neill, R.V.: 1990, ‘Linking mechanistic models of tree physiology with models of forest dynamics: problems of temporal scale’, in: Dixon, R.K., Meldahl, R.S., Ruark, G.A. and Warren, W.G. (eds.), Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress, Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Fischlin, A. and Cramer, W.: 1996, ‘Climate change impacts on forests’, in: Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C. and Moss, R.H. (eds.), Climate Change 1995 — Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses., Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C.: 1993, ‘CO2 fertilization: The great uncertainty in future vegetation development’, in: Solomon, A.M. and Shugart, H.H. (eds.), Vegetation dynamics and global change, Chapman and Hall, New York a.o., 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C.: 1996, ‘The response of complex multispecies systems to elevated CO2’, in: Walker, B. and Steffen, W. (eds.), Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 20–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, T.T., Kramer, P.J. and Pallardy, S.G.: 1991, The physiological ecology of woody plants, Academic Press, San Diego a.o., 657 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, P. and Lindner, M.: 1995, ‘Application of two forest succession models at sites in north east Germany’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, M., Bugmann, H., Lasch, P., Flechsig, M. and Cramer, W.: 1997, ‘Regional impacts of climatic change on forests in the state of Brandenburg, Germany’, Agr. For. Met. 84, 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, A. and Kienast, F.: 1992, ‘Validation of a forest succession model by means of annually laminated sediments’, in: Saarnisto, M. and Kahra, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the INQUA workshop on laminated sediments, June 4–6, 1990, Lammi, Finland, Geological Survey of Finland, Special paper series 14, 25–31.

  • Luxmoore, R.J., King, A.W. & Tharp, M.L.: 1991, ‘Approaches to scaling up physiologically based soil-plant models in space and time’, Tree Physiol. 9, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.: 1992, ‘EXE: A climatically sensitive model to study climate change and CO2 enrichment effects on forests’, Austr. J. Bot. 40, 717–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Waide, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H.: 1986, A hierarchical concept of ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. and Post, W.M.: 1985, Development of a linked forest productivity-soil process model, U.S. Dept. of Energy, ORNL/TM-9519.

  • Pickett, S.T.A. and Cadenasso, M.L.: 1995, ‘Landscape ecology: Spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems’, Science 269, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R.A., Rodriguez, J.H., Eastman, J.L., Walko, R.L. and Stocker, R.A.: 1993, ‘Influence of albedo variability in complex terrain on mesoscale systems’, J. Climate 6, 1798–1806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, I.C., Sykes, M.T. and Cramer, W.: 1993, ‘A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes’, Ecol. Modelling 65, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, H.J.: 1996, ‘Modeling the effects of temperature on growth and persistence of tree species: A critical review of tree population models’, Ecol. Modelling 92, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H.: 1984, A theory of forest dynamics. The ecological implications of forest succession models, Springer, New York a.o., 278 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H. and Seagle, S.W.: 1985, ‘Modeling forest landscapes and the role of disturbance in ecosystem communities’, in: Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. (eds.), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, Academic Press, Orlando a.o., 252–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H., Leemans, R. and Bonan, G.B.: 1992, ‘A systems analysis of the global boreal forest: Introduction’, in: Shugart, H.H., Leemans, R. and Bonan, G.B. (eds.), A systems analysis of the global boreal forest, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge a.o., 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.M. and Shugart, H.H.: 1993, ‘The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate’, Nature 361, 523–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.M. and Urban, D.L.: 1988, ‘Scale and resolution of forest structural pattern’, Vegetatio 74, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M.: 1986, ‘Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America’, Oecologia 68, 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M.: 1997, ‘Natural migration rates of trees: Global terrestrial carbon cycle implications’, in: Huntley, B., Cramer, W., Morgan, A.V., Prentice, H.C. and Allen, J.R.M. (eds.), Past and future rapid environmental changes: The spatial and evolutionary responses of terrestrial biota, Springer, Berlin a.o., 455–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M. and Kirilenko, A.P.: 1997, ‘Climate change and terrestrial biomass: what if trees do not migrate?’, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 6, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M. and Webb, T.: 1985, ‘Computer-aided reconstruction of late-quaternary landscape dynamics’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M., Tharp, M.L., West, D.C., Taylot, G.E., Webb, J.W. and Trimble, J.L.: 1984, Response of unmanaged forests to CO2-induced climate change: Available information, initial tests and data requirements, DOE/NBB-0053, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. Comm., Springfield, Virginia, 93 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G.: 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., Romme, W.H., Gardner, R.H., O'Neill R.V. and Kratz, T.K.: 1993, ‘A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes’, Landscape Ecol. 8, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H.: 1987, ‘Landscape ecology’, Bioscience 37, 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A.S.: 1947, ‘Pattern and process in the plant community’, J. Ecol. 35, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, P.C. and Gerstengarbe, F.-W.: 1997, ‘Proposal for the development of climate scenarios’, Clim. Res. 8, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, M., Dümenil, L. and Schulz, J.-P.: 1996, ‘Regional climate simulation with a high resolution GCM: surface hydrology’, Climate Dynamics 12, 755–774.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bugmann, H., Lindner, M., Lasch, P. et al. Scaling Issues in Forest Succession Modelling. Climatic Change 44, 265–289 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005603011956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005603011956

Keywords

Navigation