Abstract
The paper examines the impact of distributive justice and procedural justice variables on judgments in seven countries (Bulgaria, France, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Spain, and the United States). Subjects were presented with each of two experimental vignettes: one in which the actor unsuccessfully appeals being fired from his job and one in which the actor unsuccessfully goes to an employment agency to seek a job; they were asked to rate the justness of the outcome and how fairly the actor had been treated. The vignettes manipulated deservingness and need of the actor (distributive justice factors) and impartiality and voice in the hearing (procedural justice factors). Four hypotheses were tested: first, a distributive justice hypothesis that deservingness would be more important than need in these settings; second, a procedural justice hypothesis that the importance of voice and impartiality vary depending on the nature of the encounter and the forum in which it is resolved; third, because of their recent socialist experience, Central and Eastern European respondents make greater use of need information and less use of deservingness information than Western respondents; and fourth, that distributive justice and procedural justice factors interact. The distributive justice hypothesis is supported in both vignettes. The procedural justice hypothesis receives some support. Impartiality is more important in the first vignette and voice is more important in the second vignette. The interaction hypothesis was not supported in the first vignette, but does receive some support in the second vignette. The cultural hypothesis is not supported in either vignette. The implications for distributive and procedural justice research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Berkowitz, L., & Walster, E. (Eds.). (1976). Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press.
Bernardo, R. M. (1971). The theory of moral incentives in Cuba. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Bierhoff, H. W., Buck, E., & Klein, R. (1986). Social context and perceived justice. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 165–186). New York: Plenum Press.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Breslin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Micro and macro justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to scarcity and change (pp. 173–202). New York: Plenum Press.
Brockner, J., & Wisenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189–208.
Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In J. Breeberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 1–35). New York: Academic Press.
Cohn, E. S., & White, S. O. (1996, July). Legal socialization effects on democratization. Paper presented at the 1996 Interim Meeting of the Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies of the International Political Science Association at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Cohn, E. S., & White, S. O. (1997). Legal socialization effects on democratization. International Social Science Journal, 49, 151–171.
Cook, F. L. (1979). Who should be Helped? New York: Sage.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
de Toqueville, A. (1985 [1835]). Democracy in America. New York: Knopf.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dukerich, J. M, Golden, B. R., & Jacobson, C. K. (1996). Nested cultures and identities: A comparative study of nation and profession/occupation status effects on resource allocation decisions. In P. Bamberger, M. Erez, & S. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, 14. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Erez, M., & Earley P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 105–119.
Folger, R. (1984). Injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.
Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds), Justice in social relations (pp. 145–162). New York: Plenum Press.
Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Musingham (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161–183). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Folger, R., Rosenfeld, D., & Hays, R. P. (1978). Equity and intrinsic motivation: The role of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 557–564.
Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hegtvedt, K., & Cook, K. (in press). Distributive justice: Recent theoretical developments and applications. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Justice in socio-legal contexts. New York: Plenum Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hui, C. H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal for Research in Personality, 22, 17–36.
Jacob, H. (1992). The elusive shadow of the law. Law and Society Review, 26, 565–590.
Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K., & Isaka, H. (1988). Universalism in law conceptions of distributive justice. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 51–64.
Kleugel, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Wegener, B. (1995). Social justice and political change. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Lempert, R., & Sanders, J. (1986). An invitation to law and social science. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1–52.
Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1982). How Chinese and Americans reward task-related contributions. Psychologica, 25, 32–39.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A. (1994, July). Procedural justice, disputing, and reactions to legal authorities. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Summer Institute.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R.,& Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767–780.
Mahler, I., Greenberg, L., & Hayashi, H. (1981). A comparative study of rules of justice: Japanese versus Americans, Psychologia, 24, 1–8.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Markovits, I. (1986). Pursuing one's rights under socialism. Stanford Law Review, 38, 689.
Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Meindl, J. R., Hunt, R. G., & Cheng, Y. K. (1994). Justice on the road to change in the People's Republic of China. Social Justice Research, 7, 197–224.
Miller, D. (1992). Distributive justice: What people think. Ethics, 102, 555–593.
Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25–61). New York: Plenum Press.
Rossi, P., & Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15–67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rossi, P., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.) (1982). Measuring social judgements: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sampson, E. E. (1975). Justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45–64.
Sanders, J., Hamilton, V. L., & Yuasa, T. (1998). The institutionalization of sanctions for wrongdoing inside organizations: Public judgments in Japan, Russia, and the United States. Law and Society Review, 32, 871–930.
Schwinger, T. (1986). The need principle of distributive justice. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.
Shweder, R. A., & Levine, R. A. (1984). Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.
Sperber, A. D., Devellis, R. F., & Boehlecke, B. (1994). Cross-cultural translation: Methodology and validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 67, 785–863.
Thibaut, J., Friedland, N., & Walker, L. (1974). Compliance with rules: Some social determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 782–801.
Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: Psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 37 (pp. 41–133).Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 1006–1020.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850–863.
Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.
Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R., Smith, J., and Huo, Y. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Dawes, R. (1993). Justice in organized groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B. Mellers (Ed.), Distributive Justice (pp. 87–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–920.
Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.
Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., & Lind, E. A. (1995). Preferring, choosing, and evaluating dispute resolution procedures: The psychological antecedents of feeling and choice. Working paper, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25 (pp. 115–191). New York: Academic Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (in press). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders and V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Justice in socio-legal contexts. New York: Plenum Press.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.
Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. (4th ed., pp. 595–625). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95–104.
van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493–1503.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W.,& Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Will, J. A. (1993). The deserving poor. New York: Garland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Cohn, E.S., White, S.O. & Sanders, J. Distributive and Procedural Justice in Seven Nations. Law Hum Behav 24, 553–579 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005571012599
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005571012599