Abstract
Mediation services arise in contexts where the notions of community cohesion, relationship integrity and social order are valued over their opposites (disorder, dissent, conflict etc). Yet it is not at all clear whether and how the mediation of conflict works to re-establish harmony or consensus. Indeed it is not at all clear that mediation is always effective or just. It has even been suggested that some conflicts (e.g. work-place, commercial and sexual assault) are either not resolved or not resolved justly by mediation. On the other hand, advocates maintain that mediation can bring resolution and repair to ongoing relationships, promote community harmony, and empower people to be self-determining in the construction and maintenance of their resolutions. Whether mediation is adjudged positively or not, all mediation is instantiated in, indeed performed through, talk. In this paper I examine mediations from an Australian mediation program, and use Conversation Analysis to expose the practical methods by which mediators achieve consensus between disputants. I then examine a case in which mediation has failed to produce the sought-after consensus, and explore one way of understanding the failure of mediation in that case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arno, A. (1976). Ritual of Reconciliation and Village Conflict Management in Fiji. Oceania 47(1): 49-65.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, S. (1994). A Narrative Perspective on Mediation: Toward the Materialization of the 'Storytelling' Metaphor. In J.P. Folger and T.S. Jones (Eds.), New Directions in Mediation: Communication Research Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Community Justice Program (1992). Training and Resource Manual. Brisbane: Community Justice Division, Department of the Attorney-General.
Conley, J.M. and O'Barr, W.M. (1990a). Rules versus Relationships in Small Claims Disputes. In A.D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conley, J.M. and O'Barr, W.M. (1990b). Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dingwall, R. (1980). Orchestrated Encounter: An Essay in the Comparative Analysis of Speech-Exchange Systems. Sociology of Health and Illness 2(2): 151-175.
Garfinkel, H. (1963). A Conception of, and Experiments With, 'Trust' as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions. In Harvey, O.J. (Ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction. New York: Ronald Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hickson, L. (1986). The Social Contexts of Apology in Dispute Settlement: A Cross-Cultural Study. Ethnology 25(4): 283-294.
Macquarie University (1986). The Penguin Macquarie Dictionary. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin.
Martindale, D. (1961). The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Maynard, D.W. (1991). The Perspective Display Series and the Delivery and receipt of Diagnostic News. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Oxford University Press (1982). The Concise Oxford Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1980). Telling My Side: 'Limited Access' as a 'Fishing' Device. Sociological Inquiry (Language and Social Interaction Special Issue) 50(3/4): 186-198.
Rifkin, J. (1984). Mediation From a Feminist Perspective: Promise and Problems. Law and Inequality 2(21): 20-31.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
Saposnek, D. (1993). The Art of Family Mediation. Mediation Quarterly 11 (1): 5-12.
Schlosberg, D. (1995). Communicative Action in Practice: Intersubjectivity and New Social Movements. Political Studies 43(2): 291-311.
Schutz, A. (1962). Common-sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1964). The Problem of Rationality in the Social World. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected Papers Vol. 2: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Shonholtz, R. (1981). The Ethics and Values of Community Boards: Developing Concept Tools for the Work of Community Members. San Francisco: Community Board Program.
Smith, C.D. (1996). Competing Constraints in Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Interactional Achievement of Formality and Informality in Mediation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19(2): 79-114.
Smith, C.D. (1997). From Disagreement to Agreement: A Conversation Analytic Perspective on Mediation. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Department of Anthropology and Sociology. University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia.
Tonnies, F. (1887/1957). Community and Society. Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
Yale, D. (1993). The Heart Connection. Mediation Quarterly 11(1): 13-24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, C. Facilitating 'Perspectival Reciprocity' in Mediation: Some Reflections on a Failed Case. Human Studies 23, 1–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005562511798
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005562511798