Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and Experiments for a Computational Model of a Heat Bath

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A question of some interest in computational statistical mechanics is whether macroscopic quantities can be accurately computed without detailed resolution of the fastest scales in the problem. To address this question a simple model for a distinguished particle immersed in a heat bath is studied (due to Ford and Kac). The model yields a Hamiltonian system of dimension 2N+2 for the distinguished particle and the degrees of freedom describing the bath. It is proven that, in the limit of an infinite number of particles in the heat bath (N→∞), the motion of the distinguished particle is governed by a stochastic differential equation (SDE) of dimension 2. Numerical experiments are then conducted on the Hamiltonian system of dimension 2N+2 (N≫1) to investigate whether the motion of the distinguished particle is accurately computed (i.e., whether it is close to the solution of the SDE) when the time step is small relative to the natural time scale of the distinguished particle, but the product of the fastest frequency in the heat bath and the time step is not small—the underresolved regime in which many computations are performed. It is shown that certain methods accurately compute the limiting behavior of the distinguished particle, while others do not. Those that do not are shown to compute a different, incorrect, macroscopic limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. U. Ascher and S. Reich, On some difficulties in integrating highly oscillatory Hamiltonian systems, Proc. Alg. for Macromolecular Modelling, 1997.

  2. U. Ascher and S. Reich, The midpoint scheme and variants for Hamiltonian systems: Advantages and pitfalls, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., to appear.

  3. F. Bornemann and Schütte, Homogenization of Hamiltonian systems with a strong constraining potential, Physica D 102:57–77 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. J. Chorin, A. Kast, and R. Kupferman, On the prediction of large-scale dynamics using underresolved computations. Submitted to AMS Contemporary Mathematics, 1998.

  5. A. J. Chorin, A. Kast, and R. Kupferman, Unresolved computation and optimal predictions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., to appear.

  6. A. J. Chorin, A. Kast, and R. Kupferman, Optimal prediction of underresolved dynamics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4094–4098 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Cano, A. Stuart, E. Süli, and J. Warren, Stiff oscillatory systems, delta jumps and white noise, Technical Report SCCM-99-01, http://www-sccm.stanford.edu/pub/sccm/sccm-99-01.ps.gz.

  8. G. W. Ford, J. T. Lewis, and R. F. O'Connell, Quantum Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. A 37:4419–4428 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. W. Ford and M. Kac, On the quantum Langevin equation, J. Stat. Phys. 46:803–810 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. Gonzalez and J. C. Simo, On the stability of symplectic and energy-momentum algorithms for nonlinear Hamiltonian systems with symmetry, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 134:197–222 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products (Academic Press, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Grubmüller and P. Tavan, Molecular dynamics of conformational substates for a simplified protein model, J. Chem. Phys. 101:5047–5057 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Honerkamp, Stochastic Dynamical Systems: Concepts Numerical Methods, Data Analysis (VCH Publishers, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Jakšić and C.-A. Pillet, Ergodic properties of the Langevin equation, Lett. Math. Phys. 41:49–57 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. V. Krylov, Introduction to the Theory of Diffusion Processes, AMS Translations of Monographs, Volume 142 (1994).

  16. C. Lubich, Integration of stiff mechanical systems by Runge-Kutta methods, ZAMP 44:1022–1053 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Mandziuk and T. Schlick, Resonance in the dynamics of chemical systems simulated by the implicit midpoint scheme, Chem. Phys. Lett. 237:525–535 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Mori, Transport, collective motion, and Brownian motion, Prog. Theor. Phys. 33:423–455 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Nordholm and R. Zwanzig, A systematic derivation of generalized Brownian motion theory, J. Stat. Phys. 13:347–371 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. S. Peskin and T. Schlick, Molecular dynamics by the backward Euler method, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. XLII:1001–1031 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Rubin and P. Ungar, Motion under a strong constraining force, Comm. Pure. Appl. Math Appl. Math. X:65–87 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Schlick, M. Mandziuk, R. Skeel and K. Srinivas, Nonlinear resonance artifacts in molecular dynamics simulations, J. Comp. Phys. 140:1–29 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. D. Skeel, G. Zhang, and T. Schlick, A family of symplectic integrators: Stability, accuracy and molecular dynamics applications, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 18:203–222 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility, J. Chem. Phys. 33:1339–1341 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuart, A.M., Warren, J.O. Analysis and Experiments for a Computational Model of a Heat Bath. Journal of Statistical Physics 97, 687–723 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004667325896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004667325896

Navigation