Skip to main content
Log in

Influence Analysis for Linear Measurement Error Models

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a unified diagnostic method for linear measurement error models based upon the corrected likelihood of Nakamura (1990, Biometrika, 77, 127–137). Both global influence and local influence are discussed. The case-deletion model and mean-shift outlier model are considered, and they are shown to be approximately equivalent. Several diagnostic measures are derived and discussed. It is found that they can be written in terms of the residual and leverage measure. Some existing results are improved. Numerical example illustrates that our method is useful for diagnosing influential observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1984). The 1982 Wald memorial lectures: Estimating linear statistical relation, Ann. Statist., 12, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D. and Stefanski, L. A. (1995). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression, Technometrics, 19, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussion), J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 48, 133–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. and Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression, Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. and Hinkley, D. V. (1974). Theoretical Statistics, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzieciolowski, K. and Ross, W. H. (1990). Assessing case influence on confidence intervals in nonlinear regression, Canad. J. Statist., 18, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, L. A and Meeker, W. Q. (1992). Assessing influence in regression analysis with censored data, Biometrics, 48, 507–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1980). Properities of some estimators for the errors-in-variables models, Ann. Statist., 8, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W. K. and Kwan, C. W. (1997). A note on local influence based on normal curvature, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 59, 839–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanfelt J. J. and Liang, K. Y. (1997). Approximate likelihood for generalized linear errors-in-variables models, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 59, 627–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. E. (1984). The influence function in the errors in variables problems, Ann. Statist., 12, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, T. (1990). Corrected score function for errors-in-variables models: Methodology and application to generalized linear models, Biometrika, 77, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio, M. (1988). On the potential in the estimation of linear functions in regression, Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 17, 729–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. H. (1987). The geometry of case deletion and the assessment of influence in nonlinear regression, Canad. J. Statist., 15, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall, R. and Dunne, T. T. (1992). A connection between local influence analysis and residual diagnostics, Technometrics, 33, 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanski, L. A. and Carroll, R. J. (1987). Conditional scores and optimal scores for generalized linear measurement error models, Biometrika, 74, 703–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, B. E. and Crowley, J. (1985). A diagnostic for Cox regression and general conditional likelihoods, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 80, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. and Cook, R. D. (1989). Assessing influence on regression coefficients in generalized linear models, Biometrika, 76, 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, B. C. and Shi, J. Q. (1994). On statistical models in regression diagnostics, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 46, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, J. M. and Gunst, R. F. (1991). Influence diagnostics for linear measurement errors models, Biometrika, 78, 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, R. E. and Kuh, E. (1977). Linear regression diagnostics, Tech. Report, 923-77, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Williams, D. A. (1987). Generalized linear model diagnostics using the deviance with single case deletion, Applied Statistics, 36, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. and Luo, Z. (1993). Second-order approach to local influence, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 55, 929–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. and Wan, F. H. (1994). A perturbation scheme for nonlinear models, Statist. Probab. Lett., 20, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. and Lee, A. H. (1995). Assessment of influence in non-linear measurement error models, J. Appl. Statist., 22, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Lee, A. H. and Hui, Y. V. (1994). Influence diagnostics for generalized linear measurement error models, Biometrics, 50, 1117–1128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zhong, XP., Wei, BC. & Fung, WK. Influence Analysis for Linear Measurement Error Models. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 52, 367–379 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004126108349

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004126108349

Navigation