Skip to main content
Log in

Bootstrapping Pseudolikelihood Models for Clustered Binary Data

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asymptotic properties of the parametric bootstrap procedure for maximum pseudolikelihood estimators and hypothesis tests are studied in the general framework of associated populations. The technique is applied to the analysis of toxicological experiments which, based on pseudolikelihood inference for clustered binary data, fits into this framework. It is shown that the bootstrap approximation can be used as an interesting alternative to the classical asymptotic distribution of estimators and test statistics. Finite sample simulations for clustered binary data models confirm the asymptotic theory and indicate some substantial improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arnold, B. C. and Strauss, D. (1991). Pseudolikelihood estimation: Some examples, Sankhya Ser. B, 53, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, R. (1988). Prepivoting test statistics: A bootstrap view of asymptotic refinements. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 687–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data, The Statistician, 24, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. and Gart, J. J. (1962). The asymptotic properties of ML estimators when sampling from associated populations, Biometrika, 49, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G. J. and Portier, C. J. (1993). An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data, Biometrics, 49, 779–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanda, K. C. (1954). A note on the consistency and maxima of the roots of likelihood equations, Biometrika, 41, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, T. K. and Joshi, S. N. (1983). Comparison of the likelihood ratio, Rao's and Wald's tests and a conjecture of C. R. Rao, Sankhya Ser. A, 45, 226–246.

  • Chandra, T. K. and Mukerjee, R. (1984). On the optimality of Rao's statistic, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 13, 1507–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, T. K. and Mukerjee, R. (1985). Comparison of the likelihood ratio, Wald's and Rao's tests, Sankhya Ser. A, 47, 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, G. M., Botter, D. A. and Ferrari, S. L. P. (1994). Nonnull asymptotic distributions of three classic criteria in generalized linear models, Biometrika, 81, 709–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). The analysis of multivariate binary data, Applied Statistics, 21, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. and Wermuth, N. (1994). A note on the quadratic exponential binary distribution, Biometrika, 81, 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1991). Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangos, C. C. and Schucany, W. R. (1995). Improved bootstrap confidence intervals in certain toxicological experiments, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 24, 829–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. and Ryan, L. (1997). Pseudo-likelihood inference for clustered binary data, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 26, 2743–2768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, H., Molonberghs, G. and Ryan, L. (1999). Pseudo likelihood modelling of multivariate outcomes in developmental toxicity, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (to appear).

  • Kupper, L. L., Portier, C., Hogan, M. D. and Yamamoto, E. (1986). The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology, Biometrics, 42, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1983). Theory of Point Estimation, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, A.-M. C., Piegorsch, W. W. and Bishop, J. B. (1992). Assessing overdispersion and dose-response in the male dominant lethal assay, Mutation Research, 272, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G. and Ryan, L. (1999). Likelihood inference for clustered multivariate binary data, Environmetrics (to appear).

  • Morgan, B. J. T. (1992). Analysis of Quantal Response Data, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, R. (1990a). Comparison of tests in the multiparameter case I: Second-order power, J. Multivariate Anal., 33, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, R. (1990b). Comparison of tests in the multiparameter case II: A third-order optimality property of Rao's test, J. Multivariate Anal., 33, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, J. F., Gange, S. J., Newton, M. A., Linstrom, M. J., Palta, M. and Fisher, M. R. (1996). A survey of methods for analyzing clustered binary response data, International Statistical Review, 64, 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B. and Park, J. Y. (1988). On the formulation of Wald tests of nonlinear restrictions, Econometrica, 56, 1065–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotnitzky, A. and Jewell, N. P. (1990). Hypothesis testing of regression parameters in semiparametric generalized linear models for cluster correlated data, Biometrika, 77, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R. J. (1980). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Aerts, M., Claeskens, G. Bootstrapping Pseudolikelihood Models for Clustered Binary Data. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 51, 515–530 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003902206203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003902206203

Navigation