Abstract
In this paper we are concerned with the problem of testing against the simple-tree alternative that there is at least one treatment more effective than the control when data are subject to random right-censorship. A class of tests based on linear combinations of two-sample weighted logrank statistics each comparing an individual treatment with the control is proposed. Asymptotic relative efficiencies of the simple-tree versions of Gehan-Wilcoxon, logrank and Peto-Prentice-Wilcoxon under Lehmann and scale alternatives are evaluated for various combinations of survival distributions and censoring probabilities. The results of a Monte Carlo level and power study are presented. An illustrated numerical example is also reported.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, P. K., Borgan, O., Gill, R. D. and Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes, Springer, New York.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M. and Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, Wiley, New York.
Breslow, N. (1970). A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing k samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship, Biometrika, 57, 579–594.
Chakraborti, S. and Desu, M. M. (1991). Linear rank tests for comparing treatments with a control when data are subject to unequal patterns of censorship, Statist. Neerlandica, 45, 227–254.
Chen, Y. I. (1994). A generalized steel procedure for comparing several treatments with a control under random right-censorship, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 23, 1–16.
Dunnett, C. (1955). A multiple comparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a control, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 50, 1096–1121.
Fleming, T. R. and Harrington, D. P. (1991). Counting Processes and Survival Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Fligner, M. A. and Wolfe, D. A. (1982). Distribution-free tests for comparing several treatments with a control, Statist. Neerlandica, 36, 119–127.
Gehan, E. A. (1965). A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples, Biometrika, 52, 203–223.
Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 53, 457–481.
King, M., Bailey, D. M., Gibson, D. G., Pitha, J. V. and McCay, P. B. (1979). Incidence and growth of mammary tumors induced by 7, 12 dimethylbenz(a) antheacence as related to the dietary content of fat and antioxidant, Journal of National Cancer Institute, 63, 656–664.
Kruskal, W. H. and Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 47, 583–621.
Liu, P. Y., Green, S., Wolf, M. and Crowley, J. (1993). Testing against ordered alternatives for censored survival data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 88, 153–161.
Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration, Cancer Chemother. Rep., 50, 163–170.
Nelson, W. (1969). Hazard plotting for incomplete failure data, Journal of Quality Technology, 1, 27–52.
Peto, R. and Peto, J. (1972). Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion), J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A, 135, 185–206.
Prentice, R. L. (1978). Linear rank tests with right censored data, Biometrika, 65, 165–179.
Prentice, R. L. and Marck, P. (1979). A qualitative discrepancy between censored data rank tests, Biometrics, 35, 861–867.
Slepian, D. (1962). The one-sided barrier problem for Gaussian noise, Bell System Technical Journal, 41, 463–501.
Taron, R. E. and Ware, J. (1977). On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions, Biometrika, 64, 147–160.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YI. Simple-Tree Weighted Logrank Tests for Right-Censored Data. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 50, 311–324 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003495232676
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003495232676