Abstract
Structural equation modeling is an advanced multivariate statistical process with which a researcher can construct theoretical concepts, test their measurement reliability, hypothesize and test a theory about their relationships, take into account measurement errors, and consider both direct and indirect effects of variables on one another. Latent variables are theoretical concepts that unite phenomena under a single term, e.g., ecosystem health, environmental condition, and pollution (Bollen, 1989). Latent variables are not measured directly but can be expressed in terms of one or more directly measurable variables called indicators. For some researchers, defining, constructing, and examining the validity of latent variables may be the end task of itself. For others, testing hypothesized relationships of latent variables may be of interest. We analyzed the correlation matrix of eleven environmental variables from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program for Estuaries (EMAP-E) using methods of structural equation modeling. We hypothesized and tested a conceptual model to characterize the interdependencies between four latent variables-sediment contamination, natural variability, biodiversity, and growth potential. In particular, we were interested in measuring the direct, indirect, and total effects of sediment contamination and natural variability on biodiversity and growth potential. The model fit the data well and accounted for 81% of the variability in biodiversity and 69% of the variability in growth potential. It revealed a positive total effect of natural variability on growth potential that otherwise would have been judged negative had we not considered indirect effects. That is, natural variability had a negative direct effect on growth potential of magnitude −0.3251 and a positive indirect effect mediated through biodiversity of magnitude 0.4509, yielding a net positive total effect of 0.1258. Natural variability had a positive direct effect on biodiversity of magnitude 0.5347 and a negative indirect effect mediated through growth potential of magnitude −0.1105 yielding a positive total effects of magnitude 0.4242. Sediment contamination had a negative direct effect on biodiversity of magnitude −0.1956 and a negative indirect effect on growth potential via biodiversity of magnitude −0.067. Biodiversity had a positive effect on growth potential of magnitude 0.8432, and growth potential had a positive effect on biodiversity of magnitude 0.3398. The correlation between biodiversity and growth potential was estimated at 0.7658 and that between sediment contamination and natural variability at −0.3769.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boesch, D.F. and Rosenberg, R. (1981) Response to stress in marine benthic communities. In Stress effects on natural ecosystems, G.W. Barret and R. Rosenberg (eds), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 179-200.
Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York.
Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (1993) (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Newsburg Park, California.
Cudeck, R. (1989) Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-27.
Diaz, R.J. and Rosenberg, R. (1996) The influence of sediment quality on functional aspects of marine benthic communities. In Development and progress in sediment quality assessment rationale, challenges, techniques and strategies Ecovision World of Monograph Series, M. Munawar and G. Dave (eds), Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 57-68.
Engle, V.D., Summers, J.K., and Gaston, G.R. (1994) A benthic index of environmental condition in Gulf of Mexico estuaries. Estuaries, 17, 372-84.
Hayduk, L.A. (1987) Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, Essentials and Advances, The Johns Hopkins University Press Ltd., London.
Hayduk, L.A. (1996) LISREL Issues, Debates, and Strategies, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
Hocking, R.R. (1996) Methods and Applications of Linear Models, Regression and the Analysis of Variance, Wiley, New York.
Hoelter, J.W. (1983) The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 324-44.
Hoyle, R.H. (1995) (eds) Structural Equation Modeling, Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Joreskog, K.G. (1973) Analysis of covariance structures. In Multivariate Analysis—III, P. Krishnaiah (eds), Academic Press, New York, pp. 263-85.
Joreskog, K.G. (1977) Structural equation models in the social sciences Specification, estimation and testing. In Applications of Statistics, P. Krishnaiah (eds), North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp. 265-87.
Joreskog, K.G. (1981) Analysis of covariance structures. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 8, 65-92.
Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1982) Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404-16.
Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1996a) PRELISTM2 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International.
Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1996b) LISREL ® 8 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International.
Long, E.R., MacDonald, D.D., Smith, S.L., and Calder, F.D. (1995) Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental Management, 19, 81-97.
Malaeb, Z.A. (1997) A SAS® code to correct for non-normality and non-constant variance in regression and ANOVA models using the Box-Cox method of power transformation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 47, 255-73.
Marcoulides, G.A. and Schumacker, R.E. (1996) (eds) Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, Issues and Techniques, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
Stevens, D.L. Jr. (1994) Implementation of a National Monitoring Program. Journal of Environmental Management, 42, 1-29.
Summers, J.K., Paul, J.F., and Robertson, A. (1995) Monitoring the Ecological Condition of Estuaries in the United States. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 49, 93-108.
Wright, S. (1934) The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161-215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malaeb, Z.A., Summers, J.K. & Pugesek, B.H. Using structural equation modeling to investigate relationships among ecological variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 7, 93–111 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009662930292
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009662930292