Abstract
In this paper I consider thecontribution that theories about common propertyresource management and policies relating toparticipation can make to our understanding ofcommunal water resource management. Common totheoretical and policy approaches are the ideas thatincentives are important in defining the problem ofcollective action and that institutions apparentlyoffer a solution to it. The gendered dynamics ofincentives and institutions are explored. This paperbriefly outlines theoretical approaches toinstitutions as solutions to collective actionproblems and indicates the linkages with policiesregarding participation in water resource management.It suggests that, whilst offering considerableinsights, such approaches are limited and may resultin policy prescriptions that do little to involve orempower women. In particular, I argue that themodeling of incentives is impoverished in itseconomism and its abstraction of the individual froma life world. I suggest that the conceptualization ofinstitutions is primarily an organizational one,which, whilst alluding to the role of norms,practices, and conventions, focuses primarily onformal manifestations of collective action; contracts,committees, and meetings. Where women‘s participationis concerned, I illustrate that incentives tocooperative may be devised from reproductive concernsand the minor exigencies of daily life (as well asfrom productive concerns) and that alternative modelsof institutions may better reflect the way in whichdecisions are made and implemented within a socialcontext.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkes, F. (1989). Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.
Berkes, F. and M. Taghi Farvar (1989). “Introduction and overview,” in F. Berkes (ed.), Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.
Berry, S. (1989). “Social institutions and access to resources,” Africa(1): 41–55.
Brett, E. A. (1996). “The participatory principle in development projects: The costs and benefits of cooperation,” Public Administration and Development16: 5–19.
Bromley, D. W. (ed.) (1992). Making the Commons Work: Theory Practice and Policy. San Francisco: ICS.
Chambers. R. (1983). Rural Development. Putting the Last First.London: Longman.
Ciriacy-Wantrop, S. A. and R. C. Bishop (1975). “Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy,” Natural Resources Journal(October) 15: 713–727.
Cleaver, F. (1991). “Maintenance of rural water supplies in Zimbabwe,” Waterlines9(4): 23–26.
Cleaver, F. (1994). “Community management, A Discussion Paper,” Prepared for UNCHS Community Management Programme Review Meeting, Nairobi, 20–24 March, University of Bradford.
Cleaver, F. and D. Elson (1995). Women and Water Resources: Continued Marginalisation and New Policies, Gatekeeper Series No. 49, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Cleaver, F. and I. Lomas (1996). “The 5% ‘rule’: Fact or fiction?” Development Policy Review14(2): 173–183.
DAC (1994). Gender and Water Resources Management: Note by the DAC Expert Group on Women in Development. Paris; Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
DANIDA, (1992). Danish Sector Policies. Water Supply and Sanitation. Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Davis, S. (1996). “Implementing gender policy in the water and sanitation sector,” Natural Resources Forum20(3): 189–197.
Douglas, M. (1987). How Institutions Think. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Folbre, N. (1996). “Engendering economics: New perspectives on women, work and demographic change,” in M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Granovetter, M. (1992). “Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness,” in M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life. Oxford: Westview Press.
Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.
Klumper, A. (1995). “Analysis of water supply projects in practice,” in Development Projects: Issues for the 1990s, Papers from the 25th Anniversary Conference 7th April, DPPC, University of Bradford.
March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958). Organisations. New York: Wiley.
Mayoux, L. (1995). “Beyond naivety: Women, gender inequality and participatory development,” Development and Change26: 235–258.
Moser, C. (1989). “Gender planning in the Third World. meeting practical and strategic gender meeds,” World Development17(11): 1799–1825.
Nabli, M. and U. Nugent (1989). “The new institutional economics and its applicability to development,” World Development17(9): 1333–1347.
Najlis, P. and A. Edwards (1991). “The international drinking water supply and sanitation decade in retrospect and the implications for the future,” Natural Resources Forum15(2): 110–117.
Narayan, D. (1995). “The contribution of people's participation. Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects,” ESD Occasional Paper Series No. 1, TheWorld Bank, Washington, DC.
Nelson, R. (1995). “Recent evolutionary theorising about economic change,” Journal of Economic Literature(March) XXXIII: 48–90.
Oakerson, R. J. (1992). “Analyzing the commons: A framework,” in D. W. Bromley (ed.), Making the Commons Work: Theory and Practice and Policy, Chapter 3 (pp. 41–59). San Francisco: ICS Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. and R. Gardner (1993). “Coping with asymmetries in the commons: Self governing irrigation systems can work,” Economic Perspectives7(4): 93–112.
Ostrom, E., L. Schroeder, and S. Wynne (1993). Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Papanek, H. (1990). “To each less than she needs, from each more than she can do: Allocations, entitlements and value,” in I. Tinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities(pp. 162–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rocheleau, D. (1995). “Gendered resource mapping,” in R. Slocum, L. Wichhart, D. Rocheleau, and B. Thomas-Slayter (eds.), Power Process and Participation: Tools for Change. London: IT Publications.
Seabright, P. (1993). “Managing local Commons: Theoretical issues in incentive design,” Journal of Economic Perspectives17(4): 113–134.
SDC (1994). Sector Policy in Water Supply and Sanitation. Berne: Swiss Development Cooperation.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behaviour. New York: Macmillan.
Simon, H. A. (1991). “Organisations and markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives(Spring) 5(2): 25–44.
Slocum, P., L. Wichhart, D. Rocheleau, and B. Thomas-Slayter (1995). Power, Process and Participation: Tools for Change. London: IT Publications.
UNCED (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Agenda 21.
UNDP (1990). Background Papers and the New Delhi Statement, Global Consultation on Safe Water and Sanitation for the 1990s. New Delhi, India, UNDP, New York.
UNICEF (1986). Evaluation of the UNICEF Assisted Well Digging Programme in Matabeleland. Evaluation Report, Harare, Zimbabwe.
UNICEF (1995). UNICEF Strategies in Water and Environmental Sanitation. UNICEF, New York.
Uphoff, N. (1992). Local Institutions and Participation for Sustainable Development, Gatekeepers Series No. 31, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Uphoff, N. (1996). Learning from Gal Oya. Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. London: IT Publications.
Wade, R. (1986). “Common property resource management,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Wade, R. (1988). Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wakeman, W., S. Davis, C. van Wijk, and A. Naithani (1996). Sourcebook for Gender Issues at the Policy Level in the Water and Sanitation Sector. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
World Bank (1993). “Water resources management: A World Bank policy paper.” Washington, DC: World Bank.
Woronuik, B. (1994). “Against the current: women mainstreaming and water in UNICEF,” in Gender and Water Resources Management: Lessons Learnt and Strategies for the Future. Stockholm: SIDA.
Yacoob, M. and J. Walker (1991). “Community management in water supply and sanitation projects, costs and implications,” AQUA40(1): 30–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cleaver, F. Incentives and informal institutions: Gender and the management of water. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 347–360 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007585002325
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007585002325