Skip to main content
Log in

Incentives and informal institutions: Gender and the management of water

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I consider thecontribution that theories about common propertyresource management and policies relating toparticipation can make to our understanding ofcommunal water resource management. Common totheoretical and policy approaches are the ideas thatincentives are important in defining the problem ofcollective action and that institutions apparentlyoffer a solution to it. The gendered dynamics ofincentives and institutions are explored. This paperbriefly outlines theoretical approaches toinstitutions as solutions to collective actionproblems and indicates the linkages with policiesregarding participation in water resource management.It suggests that, whilst offering considerableinsights, such approaches are limited and may resultin policy prescriptions that do little to involve orempower women. In particular, I argue that themodeling of incentives is impoverished in itseconomism and its abstraction of the individual froma life world. I suggest that the conceptualization ofinstitutions is primarily an organizational one,which, whilst alluding to the role of norms,practices, and conventions, focuses primarily onformal manifestations of collective action; contracts,committees, and meetings. Where women‘s participationis concerned, I illustrate that incentives tocooperative may be devised from reproductive concernsand the minor exigencies of daily life (as well asfrom productive concerns) and that alternative modelsof institutions may better reflect the way in whichdecisions are made and implemented within a socialcontext.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkes, F. (1989). Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. and M. Taghi Farvar (1989). “Introduction and overview,” in F. Berkes (ed.), Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. (1989). “Social institutions and access to resources,” Africa(1): 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, E. A. (1996). “The participatory principle in development projects: The costs and benefits of cooperation,” Public Administration and Development16: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (ed.) (1992). Making the Commons Work: Theory Practice and Policy. San Francisco: ICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers. R. (1983). Rural Development. Putting the Last First.London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrop, S. A. and R. C. Bishop (1975). “Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy,” Natural Resources Journal(October) 15: 713–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (1991). “Maintenance of rural water supplies in Zimbabwe,” Waterlines9(4): 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (1994). “Community management, A Discussion Paper,” Prepared for UNCHS Community Management Programme Review Meeting, Nairobi, 20–24 March, University of Bradford.

  • Cleaver, F. and D. Elson (1995). Women and Water Resources: Continued Marginalisation and New Policies, Gatekeeper Series No. 49, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. and I. Lomas (1996). “The 5% ‘rule’: Fact or fiction?” Development Policy Review14(2): 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAC (1994). Gender and Water Resources Management: Note by the DAC Expert Group on Women in Development. Paris; Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • DANIDA, (1992). Danish Sector Policies. Water Supply and Sanitation. Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. (1996). “Implementing gender policy in the water and sanitation sector,” Natural Resources Forum20(3): 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1987). How Institutions Think. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1996). “Engendering economics: New perspectives on women, work and demographic change,” in M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1992). “Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness,” in M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumper, A. (1995). “Analysis of water supply projects in practice,” in Development Projects: Issues for the 1990s, Papers from the 25th Anniversary Conference 7th April, DPPC, University of Bradford.

  • March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958). Organisations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayoux, L. (1995). “Beyond naivety: Women, gender inequality and participatory development,” Development and Change26: 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (1989). “Gender planning in the Third World. meeting practical and strategic gender meeds,” World Development17(11): 1799–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabli, M. and U. Nugent (1989). “The new institutional economics and its applicability to development,” World Development17(9): 1333–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najlis, P. and A. Edwards (1991). “The international drinking water supply and sanitation decade in retrospect and the implications for the future,” Natural Resources Forum15(2): 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. (1995). “The contribution of people's participation. Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects,” ESD Occasional Paper Series No. 1, TheWorld Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1995). “Recent evolutionary theorising about economic change,” Journal of Economic Literature(March) XXXIII: 48–90.

  • Oakerson, R. J. (1992). “Analyzing the commons: A framework,” in D. W. Bromley (ed.), Making the Commons Work: Theory and Practice and Policy, Chapter 3 (pp. 41–59). San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and R. Gardner (1993). “Coping with asymmetries in the commons: Self governing irrigation systems can work,” Economic Perspectives7(4): 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., L. Schroeder, and S. Wynne (1993). Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, H. (1990). “To each less than she needs, from each more than she can do: Allocations, entitlements and value,” in I. Tinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities(pp. 162–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D. (1995). “Gendered resource mapping,” in R. Slocum, L. Wichhart, D. Rocheleau, and B. Thomas-Slayter (eds.), Power Process and Participation: Tools for Change. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, P. (1993). “Managing local Commons: Theoretical issues in incentive design,” Journal of Economic Perspectives17(4): 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDC (1994). Sector Policy in Water Supply and Sanitation. Berne: Swiss Development Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behaviour. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). “Organisations and markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives(Spring) 5(2): 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, P., L. Wichhart, D. Rocheleau, and B. Thomas-Slayter (1995). Power, Process and Participation: Tools for Change. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Agenda 21.

  • UNDP (1990). Background Papers and the New Delhi Statement, Global Consultation on Safe Water and Sanitation for the 1990s. New Delhi, India, UNDP, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (1986). Evaluation of the UNICEF Assisted Well Digging Programme in Matabeleland. Evaluation Report, Harare, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (1995). UNICEF Strategies in Water and Environmental Sanitation. UNICEF, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1992). Local Institutions and Participation for Sustainable Development, Gatekeepers Series No. 31, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1996). Learning from Gal Oya. Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1986). “Common property resource management,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1988). Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeman, W., S. Davis, C. van Wijk, and A. Naithani (1996). Sourcebook for Gender Issues at the Policy Level in the Water and Sanitation Sector. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993). “Water resources management: A World Bank policy paper.” Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronuik, B. (1994). “Against the current: women mainstreaming and water in UNICEF,” in Gender and Water Resources Management: Lessons Learnt and Strategies for the Future. Stockholm: SIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacoob, M. and J. Walker (1991). “Community management in water supply and sanitation projects, costs and implications,” AQUA40(1): 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cleaver, F. Incentives and informal institutions: Gender and the management of water. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 347–360 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007585002325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007585002325

Navigation