Abstract
Detailed macroscopic and histological studies of the gonads of a full size and age range of Acanthopagrus latus from each season in Shark Bay, Western Australia, demonstrate that this species is a protandrous hermaphrodite in this large subtropical embayment. Although our scheme for the changes that occur in the ovotestes of A. latus during life is not consistent with some of the conclusions drawn for this species elsewhere, it is similar to that of Pollock (1985 J. Fish. Biol. 26: 301–311) for the congeneric Acanthopagrus australis. The ovotestes of males develop from gonads which contain substantial amounts of both testicular and ovarian tissue. The testicular component of the ovotestes of all males regresses markedly after spawning. During the next spawning season, the ovotestes either become gonads in which the testicular zone again predominates and contains spermatids and spermatozoa (functional males), or gonads in which the ovarian zone now predominates and contains mature oocytes (functional females). Once a fish has become a functional female, it remains a female throughout the rest of its life. In Shark Bay, A. latustypically spawns on a limited number of occasions during a short period in late winter and early spring and has determinate fecundity. The mean potential annual fecundity was ca. 2 000 000. The total length of 245 mm, at which, during the spawning period, 50% of A. latus become identifiable as males, is very similar to the current minimum legal length (MLL) of 250 mm, which corresponds to an age of ca. 2.5 years less than that at which 50% of males become females. Thus, although the spawning potential ratio suggests that the present fishing pressure is sustainable, the current MLL should be reviewed if recreational fishing pressure continues to increase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abol-Munafi, A.B. & S. Umeda. 1994. The gonadal cycle of the yellowfin porgy, Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn) reared in the net cage at Tosa Bay, Japan. Suisanzoshoku 42: 135-144.
Abou-Seedo, F.S., S. Dadzie & K.A. Al-Kanaan. 2003. Sexuality, sex change and maturation patterns in the yellowfin seabream, Acanthopagrus latus (Teleostei: Sparidae) (Houttuyn, 1982). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 19: 65-73.
Abu-Hakima, R. 1984. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Acanthopagrus spp. (Family: Sparidae). J. Fish Biol. 25: 515-526.
Allen, G. 1997. Marine Fishes of Tropical Australia and South-East Asia: A Field Guide for Divers and Anglers, Western Australian Museum. Perth, Australia. 292 pp.
Bannerot, S., W.W. Fox Jr. & J.E. Powers. 1987. Reproductive strategies and the management of snappers and groupers in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. pp. 561-603. In: J.J. Polovina & S. Ralston (ed.) Tropical Snappers and Groupers, Biology and Fisheries Management, Westview Press, Boulder.
Besseau, L. & S. Bruslé-Sicard. 1995. Plasticity of gonad development in hermaphroditic sparids: Ovotestis ontogeny in a protandric species, Lithognathus mormyrus. Environ. Biol. Fish. 43: 255-267.
Buxton, C.D. 1992. The application of yield-per-recruit models to two South African sparid reef species, with special consideration to sex change. Fish. Res. 15: 1-16.
Buxton, C.D. & P.A. Garratt. 1990. Alternative reproductive styles in seabreams (Pisces: Sparidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 28: 113-124.
Chang, C.-W., C.-C. Hsu, Y.-T. Wang & W.-N. Tzeng. 2002. Early life history of Acanthopagrus latus and A. schlegeli (Sparidae) on the western coast of Taiwan: Temporal and spatial partitioning of recruitment. Mar. Freshw. Res. 53: 411-417.
Conover, D.O. 1992. Seasonality and the scheduling of life history at different latitudes. J. Fish Biol. 41: 161-178.
Cushing, D.H. 1990. Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: An update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. Adv. Mar. Biol. 26: 249-293.
D'Ancona, U. 1949. Ermafroditismo ed intersessualita nei Telestei. Experientia 5: 381-389.
de Vlaming, V.L. 1983. Oocyte development patterns and hormonal involvements among teleosts. pp. 176-199. In: J.C. Rankin, T.J. Pitcher & R.T. Duggan (ed.) Control Processes in Fish Physiology, Croom Helm, Beckenham.
Goodyear, C.P. 1993. Spawning stock biomass per recruit in fisheries management. Foundation and current use. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 120: 67-81.
Hall, N.G., S.A. Hesp & I.C. Potter. (in press). A Bayesian approach for overcoming inconsistencies in mortality estimates, using, as an example, data for Acanthopagrus latus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
Hesp, S.A. & I.C. Potter. 2003. Reproductive biology of the tarwhine Rhabdosargus sarba (Sparidae) in three different environments on the west coast of Australia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 83: 1333-1346.
Hunter, J.R., N.C.H. Lo & R.J.H. Leong. 1985. Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. pp. 67-78. In: R. Lasker (ed.) An Egg Production Method for Estimating Spawning Biomass of Pelagic Fish: Application to the Northern Anchovy (Engraulis mordax), U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 36.
Hussain, N.A. & M.A.S. Abdullah. 1977. The length-weight relationship, spawning season and food habits of six commercial fishes in Kuwait waters. Ind. J. Fish. 24: 181-194.
Kinoshita, Y. 1939. Studies on the sexuality of genus Sparus (Teleostei). J. Sci., Hiroshima University Series B Division 1. Zoology 7: 25-37.
Laevastu, T. 1965. Manual of Methods in Fisheries Biology. FAO, Rome. 51 pp.
Lee, J.U. & A.F. Al-baz. 1989. Assessment of fish stocks exploited by fish traps in the Arabian Gulf area. Asian Fish. Sci. 2: 213-231.
Mace, P.M. 2001. A new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management. Fish Fish. 2: 2-32.
Mace, P.M. & M.P. Sissenwine. 1993. How much spawning per recruit is enough? pp. 101-118. In: S.J. Smith, J.J. Hunt & D. Rivard (ed.) Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 120.
Milton, D.A., D. Die, C. Tenakanae & S. Swales. 1998. Selectivity for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) in the Fly River, Papua New Guinea: Implications for managing gill-net fisheries on protandrous fishes. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49: 499-506.
Pollock, B.R. 1985. The reproductive cycle of yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis (Günther), with particular reference to protandrous sex inversion. J. Fish Biol. 26: 301-311.
Punt, A.E., P.A. Garratt & A.Govender. 1993. On an approach for applying per-recruit methods to a protogynous hermaphrodite, with an illustration for the slinger Chrysoblephus puniceus (Pisces: Sparidae). S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 13: 109-119.
Sadovy, Y. & D.Y. Shapiro. 1987. Criteria for the diagnosis of hermaphroditism in fishes. Copeia 1987: 136-156.
Sarre, G.A. 1999. Hermaphroditism of Acanthopagrus butcheri in the Swan River Estuary (Chapter 6). In: Age Composition, Growth Rates, Reproductive Biology and Diets of the Black Bream Acanthopagrus butcheri in Four Estuaries and a Coastal Saline Lake in South-western Australia, Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia, 130 pp.
Sarre, G.A. & I.C. Potter. 1999. Comparisons between the reproductive biology of black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri (Teleostei: Sparidae) in four estuaries with widely differing characteristics. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 8: 179-210.
Shaw, J. 2000. Fisheries environmental management review. Gascoyne. Fisheries Environmental Management Review No 1. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 229 pp.
Tobin, A.J., M.J. Sheaves & B.W. Molony. 1997. Evidence of protandrous hermaphroditism in the tropical sparid Acanthopagrus berda. J. Fish Biol. 50: 22-33.
Travers, M.J. & I.C. Potter. 2002. Factors influencing the characteristics of fish assemblages in a large subtropical marine embayment. J. Fish Biol. 61: 764-784.
Wallace, R.A. & K. Selman. 1989. Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. Am. Zool. 21: 325-343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alex Hesp, S., Potter, I.C. & Hall, N.G. Reproductive Biology and Protandrous Hermaphroditism in Acanthopagrus latus . Environmental Biology of Fishes 70, 257–272 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EBFI.0000033344.21383.00
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EBFI.0000033344.21383.00