Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic Mentoring for New Faculty Teachers and Graduate Teaching Assistants

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports on the development and assessment of two mentoring programs, one for new faculty and one for new graduate teaching assistants. The first program was an externally funded, elaborate program; and it suggested the centrality of factors such as sustained, involving relationships for best outcomes with protégés. The second project, with newcomers to graduate study, demonstrated that a simpler program focusing on involvement within the pair and group meetings produces promising results. From both these projects, we developed a replicable model of systematic mentoring; and we obtained a clear picture of the styles and skills of exemplary mentors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alleman, E., Cochran, J., Doverspike, J., & Newman, I. (1984). Enriching mentoring relationships. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62, 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1985). Achieving academic excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehrer, J., & Sarkisian, E. (1985). The teaching assistant's point of view. In J.D.W. Andrews (Ed.), Strengthening the teaching assistant faculty, New directions for teaching and learning: No. 22., (pp. 7–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1990). Mentoring new faculty: A program for implementation. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development, 8, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992a). Lessons learned about mentoring. In M. D. Sorcinelli & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Developing new and junior faculty, New directions for teaching and learning: No. 50. (pp. 51–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992b). The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1993). New faculty involvement for women and minorities. Research in Higher Education, 34, 291–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1996). First-order principles for college teachers: Ten basic ways to improve the teaching process. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1997). What discourages research-practitioners in faculty development? In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 12 (pp. 371–434). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, B. M. (1995). Mentoring revisited: The Hispanic woman's perspective. Journal of Adult Education, 23, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, B. M., & Phillips, R. R. (1984). Mentoring as learning experiences for adults. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P. (1996). Socialization experiences of new graduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Busch, J. W. (1985). Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentors' perceptions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. W., & Blackburn, R. T. (1981). Sponsorship and academic career success. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.G. (1980). Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants: A review of empirical research. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M,. & Clark, S.M. (1984). Professional socialization and contemporary career attitudes of three faculty generations. Research in Higher Education, 20, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronan-Hillix, T., Gensheimer, L. K., Cronan-Hillix, W. A., & Davidson, W. S. (1986). Students' views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R. M., & Gray, P. (1987). National study of teaching assistants. Syracuse, NY: Center for Instructional Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, P. F., & Simpson, R. D. (1989). Investing in junior faculty: The teaching improvement program (TIPs). Innovative Higher Education, 13, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, S. (1988, January 22). Women and minority workers in business find a mentor can be a rare commodity. Wall Street Journal, p. 2.

  • Freudenthal, N. R., & DiGiorgio, A. J. (1989). New faculty mentoring: The institution as mentor. Journal of Staff, Program, & Organizational Development, 7, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G., & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Faculty development in the United States. Innovative Higher Education, 18, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E. & Hoddinott, J. (1994). Helping TAs to help themselves: A model training system using a peer TA. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development, 11, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, M. J. (1994). An empirical investigation of the effects of a teaching practicum on prospective faculty. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 500–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K. (1991). Mentoring between academic women: The capacity for interdependence. Initiatives, 54, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., & Atwater, C. D. (1993). Scaffolding the ivory tower: Building supports for faculty new to the academy. CUPA Journal, 44, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. L. (1993). TA training: From the TA's point of view. Innovative Higher Education, 18, 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P. L., & McGovern, T. V. (1988). Mentoring women in academia. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavery, P. T., Boice, R., Thompson, R. W., & Turner, J. L. (1988). An annotated bibliography of mentoring for new faculty. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development, 7, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching Tips (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., & Wulff, D. H. (1986). The training of graduate teaching assistants at the University of Washington. Seattle, Center for Instructional Development and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, L. R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 35, 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, R. G., Parson, L. A., & Duane, J. (1991). Faculty mentoring faculty in a public university. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (1988). Satisfactions and concerns of new university teachers. In J.G. Kurfiss (Ed.), To improve the academy: Resources for student, faculty, and institutional development (Vol. 7, pp. 121–131). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (1994). Effective approaches to new faculty development. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.S., & Simpson, R.D. (1995). Validating teaching competencies for faculty members in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 19, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svinicki, M. (1994). The teaching assistant: A preparation for multiple roles. In W. J. McKeachie (Ed.), Teaching Tips (9th ed., pp. 239–249). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Socializing women doctoral students: Minority and majority experiences. The Review of Higher Education, 16, 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (1990). Improving college teaching: Strategies for developing instructional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, E. J. (1991). Hit the ground running: Experiences of new faculty in a school of education. Review of Higher Education, 14, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, M. A. (1994). Developing mentoring programs: Major themes and issues. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 57, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahorski, K. J. (Ed.). (1991). To improve the academy: Resources for student, faculty, and instructional development (Vol. 10). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Peg Boyle: Graduated from the State University of New York at Stony Brook

now resides in Boone, North Carolina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, P., Boice, B. Systematic Mentoring for New Faculty Teachers and Graduate Teaching Assistants. Innovative Higher Education 22, 157–179 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183225886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183225886

Keywords

Navigation