Abstract
An understanding of attitudes toward violence against women is vital for effective prevention strategies. In this study we examined attitudes regarding violence against women in samples of undergraduate women and men students from four countries: India, Japan, Kuwait, and the United States. Attitudes toward sexual assault and spousal physical violence differed between men and women and across the four countries. Variations in gender differences across countries indicated that, for attitudes regarding sexual assault of women in particular, sociocultural factors may be a stronger influence than gender. Findings suggest the importance of examining differences within the larger sociocultural context of political, historical, religious, and economic influences on attitudes toward gender roles and violence against women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, K. B., Cooper, H., & Okamura, L. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes towards rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 293-315.
Anderson, W. P., & Cummings, K. (1993). Women's acceptance of rape myths and their sexual experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 53-57.
Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures in translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119-132.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Campbell, J. (1993). Prevention of wife battering: Insights from cultural analysis. Response, 80, 18-24.
Costin, F., & Schwarz, N. (1987). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles: A four nation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 46-56.
Gabler, M., Stern, S. E., & Miserandino, M. (1998). Latin American, Asian, and American cultural differences in perceptions of spousal abuse. Psychological Reports, 83, 587-592.
Garcia-Moreno, C. (2000). Violence against women: International perspectives. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 330-333.
Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In R. Wesley, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (pp. 549-581). New York: Free Press.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2000). Wife abuse and battering in the social context of Arab society. Family Process, 39, 237-255.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harway, M., & Hansen, M. (1993). Spouse abuse: Assessing and treating battered women, batterers, and their children. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Heath, D. B. (2001). Culture and substance abuse. Cultural Psychiatry: International Perspectives, 24, 479-496.
Johnson, B. E., Kuck, D. L., & Schnader, P. R. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693-707.
Kalof, L., & Wade, B. H. (1995). Sexual attitudes and experiences with sexual coercion: Exploring the influence of race and gender. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 224-238.
Kozu, J. (1999). Domestic violence in Japan. American Psychologist, 54, 50-54.
L'Armand, K., Pepitone, A., & Shamugan, T. (1981). Attitudes toward rape: A comparison of chastity in India and the U.S. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 284-303.
Levine, R. A. (1985). Properties of culture: An ethnographic view. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. Levine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 67-87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, D. A. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. In Frontiers of anthropology (Vol. 1, pp. 435-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Markowitz, F. E. (2001). Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 205-218.
Nayak, M. B. (1999). Gender and knowledge as factors in medical students' attitudes toward women victims of interpersonal violence. Medical Principles and Practice, 8, 294-300.
Nayak, M. B. (2000). Factors influencing hesitancy in medical students to assess history of victimization in patients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 123-133.
Nayak, M. B. (2001, December). Cultural beliefs and the use of health care by rape victims. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, New Orleans, LA.
Reichert, E. (1991). Perceptions of domestic violence against women: A cross-cultural survey of international students. Response, 78, 13-17.
Szymanski, L. A., Devlin, A. S., Chrisler, J. C., & Vyse, S. A. (1993). Gender role and attitudes toward rape in male and female college students. Sex Roles, 29, 37-57.
United Nations. (1993). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (1996). The Beijing declaration and the platform for action. New York: United Nations.
Walker, L. E. (1999). Psychology and domestic violence around the world. American Psychologist, 54, 21-29.
Ward, C. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims' scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127-146.
Weiner, K. P. (1996). Multivariate analysis of variance. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245-276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wolfgang, M., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Toward an integrated theory on criminology. London: Tavistock.
World Bank. (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Health Organization. (1997). Violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yick, A. G., & Agbayani-Siewert, P. (1997). Perceptions of domestic violence in the Chinese community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 834-846.
Yllo, K. (1984). The status of women, marital equality, and violence against wives. Journal of Family Issues 5, 307-320.