Skip to main content
Log in

A Small Macroeconomic Model of the EU-Accession Countries

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a small macro-economic model of the CEECs to analyze various aspects of integration with the current EU and the role of monetary and exchange rate strategies during the (pre-) accession phase. The model gives insight into both the adjustment of the internal balance (as for output and employment) and the external balance (as for exports and competitiveness) in the accession countries. The model provides more insight into the basic macroeconomic relationships governing macroeconomic adjustment in the accession countries and also the role of the integration with the EU in that adjustment. We perform empirical simulations of different scenarios and analyze the resulting macroeconomic adjustment. In particular, we compare how a macroeconomic shock in the current EU is transmitted to the accession countries under flexible and fixed euro exchange rates, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arratibel, O., D. Rodríguez-Palenzuela, and C. Thimann (2002) “Inflation Dynamics and Dual Inflation in Accession Countries: A 'New Keynesian' Perspective.” ECB Working Paper no. 132, European Central Bank, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buracas, A. and V. Sakalauskas (2001) “Exchange Rates and Structural Changes: Baltics in PreAccession.” mimeo

  • Basdevant, O. (2000) “An Econometric Model of the Russian Federation.” Economic Modelling 17:305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bofinger, P. and T. Wollmershaeuser (2001) “Is there a Third Way to EMU for the EU Accession Countries?” Economic Systems 25:253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charemza,W. (1994) “LAM models for East European Economies: General description.” Discussion Paper, University of Gdansk.

  • Douven, R. and J. Plasmans (1995) “SLIM, A Small Linear Interdependent Model of Eight EU-Member States, the USA and Japan.” Economic Modelling 13:185–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R.C. (2001) “Estimates of the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy.” Yales Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 1298, Yale University.

  • Golinelli, R. and R. Rovelli (1999) “Monetary Policy and the Convergence to Low Inflation: A Small Macro Model for Hungary and Poland.” 1991–1998, mimeo.

  • Hall, S., G. Myzon, and A. Welfe (2000) “Modelling Economies in Transition: An Introduction.” Economic Modelling 17(3):339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juszczak, G., M. Kazmierska, N. Lapinska-Sobczak, and W. Welfe (1993) “Quarterly Model of the Polish Economy in Transition (with Special Emphasis on Financial Flows).” Economic Modelling 10(2):127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L., A. Welfe, and W. Welfe (1999) “Principles of Macroeconometric Modeling.” Advanced Textbooks in Economics vol. 36. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lättemä, R. and R. Pikkani (2001) “Monetary Transmission Mechanism under Currency Board Arrangement. Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Estimation on Estonian Data.” Bank of Estonia, Central Banking Policy Department and Research Department.

  • Nenovsky, N., V. Yotzov, and K. Hristov (2000) “Inflation under a Currency Board. The Case of Bulgaria.” mimeo.

  • OENB (1997) “Monetary Policy in Transition in East and West: Strategies, Instruments and Transmission Mechanisms.” Vienna: Austrian National Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlowski, L. (2001) “From Inflation Targeting to the Euro-Peg. A Model of Monetary Convergence for Transition Economies.” Economic Systems 25:233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plasmans, J. (1999) “Towards a Strategic Multi-Country Model for Trade and Employment in the Baltics.” mimeo.

  • Schoors, K. (2002) “Should the Central and Eastern European Accession Countries Adopt the Euro Before or After Accession.” Economics of Planning 35:47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (1993) “Discretion versus Policy rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39:195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinhas de Souza, L. (1999) “Strategies of Exchange Rate Linkages of EU Application Countries and Their Likely Future Developments.” mimeo.

  • Vinhas de Souza, L. and E. Ledrut (2001) “Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes for pre-EMU Integration: Individual Estimations for the Accession Countries.” mimeo.

  • Vinhas de Souza, L. (2002) “Integrated Monetary and Exchange Rate Frameworks: Are There Empirical Differences?” Working Paper no. 2 Bank of Estonia.

  • von Hagen, J. and J. Zhou (2002) “The Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes: An Empirical Analysis for Transition Economies.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3289.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merlevede, B., Plasmans, J. & van Aarle, B. A Small Macroeconomic Model of the EU-Accession Countries. Open Economies Review 14, 221–250 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023931019462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023931019462

Navigation