Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Culture and Whistleblowing An Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leaders and managers of today's multinational corporations face a plethora of problems and issues directly attributable to the fact that they are operating in an international context. With work-sites, plants and/or customers based in another country, or even several countries, representing a vast spectrum of cultural differences, international trade and offshore operations, coupled with increased globalisation in respect to political, social and economic realities, contribute to new dilemmas that these leaders must deal with. Not the least of these being a Code of Ethics and ethical decision making.This paper examines the differences in culture between a group of managers from the United States and similar group from Croatia using Hofstede's theory of International Cultures. The study explores how these cultural dimensions may help in our understanding of the differences in reported whistleblowing. The authors then postulate four hypotheses regarding various aspects of whistleblowing. These Hypotheses were than tested using a survey administered to a sample of U.S.A. and Croatian managers. Finally, the paper discusses the findings and practical implications for contemporary managers in the international arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N.: 1983, ‘Cross-Cultural Management Research: The Ostrich and the Trend’, Academy of Management Review 8(2), 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agacer, G. M. and T. S. Doupnik: 1991, ‘Perceptions of Auditor Independence: A Cross-Cultural Study’, The International Journal of Accounting 26, 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, C. F.: 1999, ‘Whistle-Blowers: How Much We Can Learn from Them Depends on How Much We Can Give Up’, The American Behavioral Scientist 43(2), 264–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, B.: 2000, ‘Whistle Blowing’, New Zealand Management 47(4), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. A. (ed.): 1988, The Cross-Cultural Challenge to Social Psychology (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and G. M. Stalker: 1961, The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London, U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., L. W. Pant and D. J. Sharp: 1995, ‘An Exploratory Examination of International Differences in Auditors Ethical Perceptions’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 7, 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E. and A. Kennedy: 1982, Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner and Gray: 1994, ‘Cognizant of Culture’, Small Business Reports: Business Bulletins 6.

  • Figg, J.: 2000, ‘Whistleblowing’, The Internal Auditor 57, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W.: 1986 ‘Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 8 ( JAI Press Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1984, ‘The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept’, Academy of Management Review 9, 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1997, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (London: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubb, P.: 1999, ‘Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation’, Journal of Business Ethics 21, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B. L. and R. S. Bhagar: 1988, ‘Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology across nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management’, Academy of Management Review 13(4), 559–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1990, ‘Upper-Level Managers and Whistleblowing: Determinants of Perceptions of Company Encouragement and Information about Where to Blow the Whistle’, Journal of Business and Psychology 5(2), 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1991, ‘Upper-Level Managers, Middle-Level Managers, and Whistleblowing: A Comparative Study and Evaluation’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami Beach.

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1995, ‘Whistleblowing and the First-Level Manager: Determinants of Feeling Obliged to Blow the Whistle’, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10(3), 571–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 2000, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Less Serious Forms of Fraud. A Study of Executives and Managers’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 12, 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 2002, ‘Comparing Indian and American Managers on Whistleblowing’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14(2, 3), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P., and D. A. McLain: 1992, ‘Whistleblowing: A Conceptualization and Model’, in J. L. Wall and K. R. Jauch (eds.), Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, August 10–12 (Las Vegas, NV), pp. 350–352.

  • Keenan, J. P. and R. Parikh: 2000, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Wrongdoing: A Cross-Cultural Study’, in Proceedings of the Applied Business Research Conference, March 13–17, Puerto Vallarta.

  • Keenan, J. P. and S. Remington: 2002, ‘Cultural Influences on Whistleblowing: A Study of Philippine and U.S. Managers’, in Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute (Las Vegas, NV), April 2–5, 2002.

  • Keenan, J. P. and K. Xin: 1993 ‘Comparing Indian and American Managers on Whistleblowing: An Exploratory Study and Evaluation’, in D. F. Rogers and A. S. Raturi (eds.), 1993 Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute (Washington D.C.), pp. 368–371.

  • Keenan, J. P. and K. Xin: 1999 ‘Comparing Chinese and American Managers on Whistleblowing: An Exploratory Study and Vvaluation’, in D. K. Despotis and C. Zopounidis (eds.), Decision Sciences Institute 5th Interntional; Conference Proceedings (Athens, Greece), pp. 736–739.

  • Kroeber, A. L. and C. Kluckhohn: 1952, Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, Vol. 7(1) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, A.: 1986, ‘The Cross-Cultural Puzzle of International Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Management 25, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, I: 2001, ‘Need to Protect Whistleblowers’, Australian Financial Review ( July 4), 51.

  • McLain, D. A. and J. P. Keenan: 1999, ‘Risk, Information, and the Decision about Response to Wrongdoing in an Organization’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1988 ‘Individual and Situational Correlates of Whistleblowing’, Personnel Psychology 41, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992, Blowing the Whistle, The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara-Devereaux, M. and R. Johansen: 1994, Globalwork Bridging Distance, Culture and Time ( Jossey-Bass Publishers' San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, J. J.: 1979 ‘Corporate and Managerial Cultures’, in C. L. Cooper (ed.), Behavioral Problems in Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englwood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oziel, C.: 2002, ‘U.K. Encourages Corporate Whistleblowers: Now Management will be the First, Not the Last, to Know about Potential Problems: Called a Win for Everyone’, National Post f/k/a The Financial Post, 16 Reuters

  • Pettigrew, A. M.: 1979, ‘On Studying Organizational Cultures’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogovsky, N.: 1996, IHRM Practices in Multinational Corporations: Developing IHRM Integrative Frame-Work (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. and L. L. Park: 1999, ‘An Empirical Investigation of Cultural Differences in Ethical Decision Making among U.S. Accounting Students’, Journal of Education for Business 74, 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C.: 1986, ‘National vs Corporate Culture: Implications for Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Management 27, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. and W. Bilsky: 1990, ‘Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 878–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. and J. P. Keenan: 1998; ‘Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. and J. P. Keenan: 1999, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managers' Whistleblowing Tendencies’, International Journal of Values-Based Management 12, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F.: 1996, Riding the Waves of Culture (Wernon Sodenstrom, Finland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, J. and C. Windsor: 2001, ‘Some Cross Cultural Evidence on Ethical Reasoning’, Journal of Business Ethics 31, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board USMSPB: 1981, Whistleblowing and the Federal Employee (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirova, A.: 2000, ‘Balkan States Stand Behind Business Code of Ethics’, Financial Times (March 10).

  • Wines, W. A. and N. K. Napier: 1992, ‘Toward an Understanding of Cross-Cultural Ethics: A Tentative Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 831–842.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Fayetteville State University, 1299 Murchison Road, Fayetteville, NC, 28301, U.S.A.

    A. A. Tavakoli

  2. Leadership Programs, ACCEL – Medaille College, 2 Hillsboro Drive, Orchard Park, NY, U.S.A.

    John P. Keenan

  3. Faculty of Economics, University of Split, Split, Croatia

    B. Cranjak-Karanovic

Authors
  1. A. A. Tavakoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John P. Keenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Cranjak-Karanovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavakoli, A.A., Keenan, J.P. & Cranjak-Karanovic, B. Culture and Whistleblowing An Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 49–64 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022959131133

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022959131133

Search

Navigation