Abstract
Gnamptogenys menadensis (subfamily Ponerinae) foragers use chemical trails to home to their nests. Although prey capture and retrieval are generally performed solitarily, trails seem to enhance foraging to areas rich in prey or to sugar sources. Trail laying and following are most conspicuous during nest migration. These trails are laid down by tapping the sting onto the substrate. In laboratory tests, only extracts from the Dufour's gland were readily followed. Workers of Polyrhachis rufipes (Formicinae) use the trails of G. menadensis to gain access to otherwise nonavailable sugar sources. When they encounter Gnamptogenys foragers, P. rufipes workers show a typical aggressive antennal boxing, to which Gnamptogenys reacts with a submissive behavior. This is the first report of commensalism between a ponerine and a formicine ant.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baroni-Urbani, C. (1969). Trail sharing between Camponotus and Crematogaster: Some comments and ideas. Proc. VI Congr. IUSSI, Bern, pp. 11–17.
Beckers, R., Goss, S., Deneubourg, J. L., and Pasteels, J. M. (1989). Colony size, communication and foraging strategy. Psyche 96: 239–256.
Bestmann, H. J., Janssen, E., Kern, F., Liepold, F., and Hölldobler, B. (1995). All-trans geranylgeranyl acetate and geranylgeraniol. Recruitment pheromone components in the Dufour gland of the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum. Naturwissenschaften 82: 334–336.
Billen, J. (1987). New structural aspects of the Dufour's and venom glands in social insects. Naturwissenschaften 74: 340–341.
Billen, J., and Morgan, E. D. (1998). Pheromone Communication in social insects—Sources and secretions. In Vander Meer, R. K. Breed, M., Espelie, K., and Winston, M. (eds.), Communication in Social Insects: Ants, Wasps, Bees and Termites Westview Press, Boulder-Oxford, pp. 3–33.
Gobin, B., Peeters, C., and Billen, J. (1998). Colony reproduction and arboreal life in the ponerine and Gnamptogenys menadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Neth. J. Zool. 48: 53–63.
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kaudewitz, F. (1955). Zum Gastverhältnis zwischen Crematogaster scutellaris Ol. mit Camponotus lateralis bicolor Ol. Biol. Zentralbl. 74: 69–87.
Kohout, R. J. (1990). A review of the Polyrhachis viehmeyeri species group. Mem. Queensland Mus. 28: 499–508.
Lattke, J. (1995). Revision of the ant genus Gnamptogenys in the New World (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Hym. Res. 4: 137–193.
Mann, W. M. (1912). Parabiosis in Brazilian ants. Psyche 19: 36–41.
Morgan, E. D., and Wadhams, L. J. (1972). Gas chromatography of volatile compounds in small samples of biological materials. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 10: 528–529.
Pasteels, J. M., and Verhaeghe, J. C. (1974). Dosage biologique de la phéromone de piste chez les fourrageuses et les reines de Myrmica rubra. Insectes soc. 25: 167–180.
Peeters, C. (1997). Morphologically “primitive” ants: Comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen-worker dimorphism. In Choe, J., and Crespi, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 372–391.
Peeters, C. P., and Crewe, R. M. (1987). Foraging and recruitment in ponerine ants: Solitary hunting in the queenless Ophthalmopone berthoudi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 94: 201–214.
Pratt, S. C. (1994). Ecology and behaviour of Gnamptogenys horni (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Insectes soc. 41: 255–262.
Swain, R. B. (1980). Trophic competition among parabiotic ants. Insectes soc. 27: 377–390.
Wilson, E. O. (1965). Trail sharing in ants. Psyche 72: 2–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gobin, B., Peeters, C., Billen, J. et al. Interspecific Trail Following and Commensalism Between the Ponerine Ant Gnamptogenys menadensis and the Formicine Ant Polyrhachis rufipes . Journal of Insect Behavior 11, 361–369 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020950630154
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020950630154