Skip to main content
Log in

Short Single Axioms for Boolean Algebra

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present short single equational axioms for Boolean algebra in terms of disjunction and negation and in terms of the Sheffer stroke. Previously known single axioms for these theories are much longer than the ones we present. We show that there is no shorter axiom in terms of the Sheffer stroke. Automated deduction techniques were used in several parts of the work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avenhaus, J.: Correspondence by electronic mail, 2000.

  2. Hillenbrand, T., Buch, A., Vogt, R. and Löchner, B.: Waldmeister, J. Automated Reasoning 18(2) (1997), 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kunen, K.: Single axioms for groups, J. Automated Reasoning 9(3) (1992), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCune, W.: Otter, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/AR/otter/, 1994.

  5. McCune, W.: Otter 3.0 reference manual and guide, Technical Report ANL-94/6, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCune, W.: Solution of the Robbins problem, J. Automated Reasoning 19(3) (1997), 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCune, W.: Single axioms for Boolean algebra, Tech. Memo ANL/MCS-TM-243, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCune, W.: MACE 2.0 reference manual and guide, Tech. Memo ANL/MCS-TM-249, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCune, W. and Shumsky, O.: IVY: A preprocessor and proof checker for first-order logic, in M. Kaufmann, P. Manolios and J. Moore (eds), Computer-Aided Reasoning: ACL2 Case Studies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, Chapt. 16.

  10. Meredith, C. A.: Equational postulates for the Sheffer stroke, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 10(3) (1969), 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meredith, C. A. and Prior, A. N.: Equational logic, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 9 (1968), 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Padmanabhan, R. and McCune, W.: Single identities for ternary Boolean algebras, Comput. Math. Appl. 29(2) (1995), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Padmanabhan, R. and Quackenbush, R. W.: Equational theories of algebras with distributive congruences, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 41(2) (1973), 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheffer, H.: A set of five independent postulates for Boolean algebras, with application to logical constants, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 14(4) (1913), 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veroff, R.: Using hints to increase the effectiveness of an automated reasoning program: Case studies, J. Automated Reasoning 16(3) (1996), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veroff, R.: Short 2-bases for Boolean algebra in terms of the Sheffer stroke, Technical Report TR-CS-2000-25, Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,NM, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wolfram, S.: Correspondence by electronic mail, 2000.

  18. Wos, L.: Searching for circles of pure proofs, J. Automated Reasoning 15(3) (1995), 279–315.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wos, L. and Pieper, G.: A Fascinating Country in the World of Computing: Your Guide to Automated Reasoning, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, J. and Zhang, H.: SEM: A system for enumerating models, in Proc. IJCAI-95, Vol. 1, 1995, pp. 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCune, W., Veroff, R., Fitelson, B. et al. Short Single Axioms for Boolean Algebra. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29, 1–16 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020542009983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020542009983

Navigation