Skip to main content
Log in

The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of on-line learning environments has received considerable attention in recent years. Generally, researchers have found little impact of virtual learning environments on learning outcomes. With a few exceptions, however, these studies have focused upon distance learning courses where students enter the course without expectations of significant amounts of face-to-face contact with the instructor(s). Information technology, and particularly Web-based multimedia, increasingly offers opportunities to transfer content delivery and other associated activities from face-to-face settings to on-line venues. However, in order for this transference of content and process to be effective in courses recognized as face-to-face courses, students must find the virtual environment appealing. They must also achieve learning outcomes at least as high as those achieved in traditional class settings. The research reported upon herein demonstrates the utility of on-line learning environments in traditional classes both as an efficient means for executing activities previously tethered to the classroom setting and as a means to allow the pursuit of higher levels of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Leidner and S. Jarvenpaa, The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms, Information Systems Research 4 (1993) 24–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Althaus, Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions, Communication Education 46 (1997) 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Shneiderman, M. Alavi, K. Norman and E. Borkowski, Windows of opportunity in electronic classrooms, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 38 (1995) 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Alavi, Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation, MIS Quarterly 18 (1994) 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Alavi, B. Wheeler and J. Valacich, Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning, MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. McComb, Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses, Communication Education 43 (1994) 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Shneiderman, Education by engagement and construction: Experiences in the AT&T teaching theatre, in: Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Annual, ed. H. Maurer (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1993) pp. 13–26.

  8. K. Norman, Navigating the educational space with HyperCourseware, Hypermedia 6 (1992) 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Schlechter, The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer-based training, Journal of Educational Computing Research 6 (1990) 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Borg and S. Shapiro, Personality types and student performance in principles of economics, Journal of Economic Education 27 (1996) 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Juran, Juran on Planning for Quality (Free Press, 1988).

  12. W. Demming, Out of Crisis (MIT Press, 1986).

  13. R. Bartlett, Discovering diversity in introductory economics, Journal of economic perspectives 10 (1996) 141–53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Alavi, Y. Yoo and D. Vogel, Using information technology to add value to management education, Academy of Management Journal 40 (1997) 1310–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Gibbons, The effectiveness of technology applied to instruction: A summary of the research literature, Center for Communications, San Diego State University, CA (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Hiltz, The Virtual Classroom: Learning without Limits via Computer Networks (Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1994).

  17. R. LaRose, J. Gregg and M. Eastin, Audiographic Telecourses for the Web: An experiment, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4 (1998) (http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol4/issue2/larose.html).

  18. M. Lage, G. Platt and M. Treglia, Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment, Journal of Economic Education, forthcoming.

  19. I. Myers, Introduction to Type (Consulting Psychologists Press, 1986).

  20. J. Stevens, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986).

  21. A. Wildt and O. Ahtola, Analysis of Covariance (Sage Publications, 1990).

  22. B. Pasternack and G. Charen, A simplified guide to covariance analysis using two concomitant variables illustrated on data from an experiment in education, Science Education 53 (1969) 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Huitema, The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives (Wiley, 1980).

  24. B. Bloom (ed.), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals (Longman, 1956).

  25. D. Kolb, Learning styles and disciplinary differences, in: The Modern American College, eds. Chickering and Associates, Inc. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1981) pp. 232–255.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCray, G.E. The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management 1, 307–327 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019189412115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019189412115

Navigation