Skip to main content
Log in

The development of a new site-specific measure of quality of life for breast problems: The Cardiff breast scales

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of women presenting to primary care with symptoms of breast disease is of increasing interest given recent organisational changes aimed at improving accuracy and speed of referrals. As part of a randomised controlled trial, 1063 women were recruited following a primary care consultation for a variety of breast-related problems. In the absence of a suitable outcome measure for such women, a site-specific instrument was developed to complement a generic quality of life scale (SF-36). Items were generated using key informant interviews with health professionals. Draft scale items were piloted using a postal questionnaire and subsequent patient debrief interviews. A sample of respondents were also sent the same questionnaire 1month later to assess test–retest reliability. Across the whole sample (n = 848), three factors were identified: ‘general well-being’, ‘concerns’ and ‘relationships’. These factors accounted for 60% of total variance. Evidence of scale validity, reliability and responsiveness are reported for this new outcome measure for use in women presenting with breast problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The BRIDGE study group. The presentation and management of breast symptoms in general practice in South Wales-The Bridge Study. Brit J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 811–812.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austoker J, Mansel R, Baum M, Sainsbury R, Hobbs R. Guidelines for the Referral of Patients with Breast Problems. 1st ed. Sheffield: NHS Breast Screening Programme, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thorsen T, Makela M. Changing Professional Practice. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Health Services Research, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones D. Patient-assessed outcome measures. In: Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds), Health Services Research Methods, London: BMJ Books, 1998: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH Patrick DL. Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12: 81S-90S.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schipper H, Clinch J, Olweny C. Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson M, Hamrin E. Measurement of quality of life in women with breast cancer. Development of a life satisfaction questionnaire (LSQ-32) and a comparison with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality of life instrument. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 974–986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Russell I, et al. Developing a condition-specific measure of health for patients with dyspepsia and ulcer-related symptoms. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 565–571.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peters TJ, Somerset M, Baxter K, Wilkinson C. Anxiety amongst women with mild dyskaryosis: A randomised trial of an educational intervention. Brit J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perneger TV, Etter J-F, Rougemont A. Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: A community based study in Geneva, Switzerland. J Epidemiol Commun H 1997; 51: 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Robling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robling, M., Matthews, S., Hood, K. et al. The development of a new site-specific measure of quality of life for breast problems: The Cardiff breast scales. Qual Life Res 11, 339–348 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015595627501

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015595627501

Navigation