Abstract
In recent years, considerable discussion has occurred about stigma surrounding the name given to an illness currently known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although patients and medical personnel have expressed varying opinions on this issue, no studies have evaluated how beliefs about the illness change based upon the type of name used for diagnostic purposes. Proposals have been put forth to rename the illness with an eponym (a famous patient's or researcher's name) or with a less trivial sounding, more medically based type of name. In this study, attributions about CFS were measured in three groups of medical trainees. All groups read the same case study of a person with classic symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome, with the only difference being in the type of name given. Trainees then were asked to provide attributions about certain aspects of the illness, including its cause, severity, and prognosis. Results suggested that, across name conditions, most trainees appeared to consider the symptom complex of CFS a serious illness resulting in poor quality of life. In addition, findings indicated that the name, chronic fatigue syndrome, may be regarded less seriously than the Myalgic Encephalopathy name with respect to some important aspects of the illness. In this study, specialty of medical trainee also played a role in how the illness was perceived.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abbey, S. E., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1991). Neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of culture in the making of a diagnosis. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 148 1638-1646.
Burns, R. (1998). Responses for CFS name survey two. Retrieved from http://www.cais.net/cfs-news/responses-2.htm
Donnay, A. (1999). CPARDigest (e-mail note posted to a CFS electronic bulletin board, May 6, 1999).
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1990). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 61-74). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
Friedberg, F., & Jason, L. A. (1998). Understanding chronic fatigue syndrome: An empirical guide to assessment and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hahn, H. (1990). The politics of physical difference: Disability and discrimination. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 118-123). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
Hoh, D. (1999). Why not just call it M.E.? The CIFIDS Chronicle, 12 9.
Holmes, G. P., Kaplan, J. E., Gantz, N. M., Komaroff, A. L., Schonberger, L. B., Strauss, S. S., et al. (1988). Chronic fatigue syndrome:Aworking case definition. Annals of Internal Medicine, 108 387-389.
Jason, L. A., Kolak, A. M., Purnell, T., Cantillon, D., Camacho, J. M., Klein, S., & Lerman, A. (2001). Collaborative ecological community interventions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 21 35-52.
Jason, L. A., Richman, J. A., Friedberg, F., Wagner, L., Taylor, R., & Jordan, K. M. (1997). Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease: The case of chronic fatigue syndrome. American Psychologist, 52 973-983.
Katz, I., Hass, G., & Bailey, J. (1988). Attributional ambivalence and behavior toward people with disabilities. In H. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 47-57). New York: Springer.
Lorber, J. (1997). Gender and the social construction of illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Meyerson, L. (1990). The social psychology of physical disability: 1948-1988. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 13-23). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
Murray, T. J. (1995). The psychosocial aspects of multiple sclerosis. Neurologic Clinics, 13 197-223.
Name-Change Survey Results. (1997). Retrieved from http://www.cfids.org/chronicle/97summer/survey.html
Richman, J. A., Jason, L. A., Taylor, R. R., & Jahn, S. C. (2000). Feminist perspectives on the social construction of illness states. Health Care for Women International, 22 173-185.
Romei, J., Green, J., & Heinzen, T. (1996). Perceived stigma in chronic fatigue syndrome. Poster presented at the 1996 Eastern Psychological Association.
Rosenberg, C. E. (1989). Disease in history: Frames and framers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences.
Schmelkin, L. (1988). Multidimensional perspectives in the perception of disabilities. In H. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 127-137). New York: Springer.
Shlaes, J. L., Jason, L. A., & Ferrari, J. R. (1999). The development of the chronic fatigue syndrome attitudes test: A psychometric analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 22 442-465.
Simpson, L. (1999). CPARDigest (e-mail note posted to a CFS electronic bulletin board, May 6, 1999).
Soder, M. (1990). Prejudice or ambivalence? Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Disability, Handicap, and Society, 5 227-241.
Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Ware, N. C., & Kleinman, A. (1992). Culture and somatic experience: The social cause of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54 546-560.
Wright, B. (1988). Attitudes and the fundamental negative bias: Conditions and corrections. In H. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 3-21). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jason, L.A., Taylor, R.R., Plioplys, S. et al. Evaluating Attributions for an Illness Based Upon the Name: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Myalgic Encephalopathy and Florence Nightingale Disease. Am J Community Psychol 30, 133–148 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014328319297
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014328319297