Abstract
Detailed karyotypes and 4C DNA amounts have been studied in five cultivars of Cajanus cajan and 20 species belonging to Cajanus, Rhynchosia, Dunbaria, Flemingia and Paracalyx. C. cajan shows intraspecific variability and its karyotype is most similar to that of C. cajanifolius (sect. Cajanus) in the morphology and number of satellite chromosomes and the lack of any correlation between chromosome size within the complement and asymmetry. Karyotypes of C. lineatus and C. sericeus belonging to sect. Atylia are similar with respect to maximum r-index and the ratio of longest and shortest chromosomes in their respective complements. C. acutifolius (sect. Frutocosa) is distinct in having a very low ratio (1.44) between the longest and the shortest chromosomes, while in C. albicans, C. goensis, C. scarabaeoides (sect. Cantharospermum) there is no chromosome pair with r-index >2.0. C. mollis and C. volubilis (sect. Volubilis) show similarity with regard to ratio between the longest and the shortest chromosomes and a distinct chromosome pair with an arm ratio of 2.7 and C. platycarpus is distinct (sect. Rhynchosoides) in having the smallest ratio (1.36) between the longest and the shortest chromosomes. 4C DNA amounts in Cajanus and Rhynchosia vary between 3.28 pg to 11.69 pg and 4.92 pg to 11.13 pg respectively, while in Dunbaria, Flemingia and Paracalyx these vary between 4.70 and 7:06 pg. In the genus Cajanus karyotypic features and 4C DNA amounts agree with the sectional classification and bring out a close relationship between C. cajan and C. cajanifolius. This is supported by studies based on seed protein patterns, isozyme analysis, trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor patterns, RFLP and RAPD data and crossability relationships. A clear relation between DNA amount and abnormalities effecting the extent of pairing and recombination in interspecific hybrids shows the importance of this study in developing future breeding programme involving C. cajan and its wild relatives that are of potential value.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bairiganjan G.C. and Patnaik S.N. 1989. Chromosomal evolution in Fabaceae. Cytologia 54: 51–64.
Bir S.S. and Sidhu M. 1980. Cyto-palynological studies on weed flora of cultivable lands of Patiala district (Punjab). J. Palynolo. 16: 85–105.
Dundas I.S. 1990. Pigeonpea, cytology and cytogeneticsperspective and prospects. In: Nene, Y.L., S.D. Hall and V.K. Sheila (eds.), The Pigeonpea, CAB International Publications, UK, pp. 117–136.
Greilhuber J. and Obermayer R. 1998. Genome size variation in Cajanus cajan (Fabaceae): a reconsideration. Plant Syst. Evol. 212: 135–141.
Jha S.S. and Ohri D. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeonpea) and its wild relatives. Genet. Resourc. Crop Evol. 43: 275–281.
Kollipara K.P., Singh L. and Hymowitz T. 1994. Genetic variation of trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors in pigeonpea Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and its wild relatives. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 986–993.
Krishna T.G. and Reddy L.J. 1982. Species affinities between Cajanus cajan and some Atylosia species based on esterase isoenzymes. Euphytica 31: 709–713.
Kumar P.S., Subrahmanyam N.C. and Fans D.G. 1987. Nucleolar behaviour in pollen mother cells in the pigeonpea. J. Hered. 78: 366–368.
Ladizinsky G. and Hamel A. 1980. Seed protein profiles of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and some Atylosia species. Euphytica 29: 31 3–317.
Levan A., Fredga K. and Sandberg A.A. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position of chromosomes. Herediras 52: 201–220.
Maesen L.J.G. van der 1986. Cajanus DC. and Atylosia W. and A. (Leguminosae). Agricult. Univ. Wageningen Papers, The Netherlands. 225 p.
Maesen L.J.G. van der 1990. Pigeonpea: origin, history, evolution, and taxonomy. In: Nene, Y.L., D. Halls and V.K. Sheila (eds.), The Pigeonpea, CAB International Publications UK, pp. 15–45.
Nadimpalli R.G., Jarret R.L., Pathak S.C. and Kochert G. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism. Genome 36: 216–223.
Narayan R.K.J. 1998. The role of constraints upon evolutionary changes in genome size and chromosome organization. Ann. Bot. Suppl. A 82: 57–66.
Ohri D. 1998. Genome size variation and plant systematics. Ann. Bot. Suppl. 82: 75–83.
Ohri D. and Pal M. 1991. The origin of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): karyotype and nuclear DNA amount. Heredity 66: 367–372.
Ohri D., Jha S.S. and Kumar S., 1994. Variability in nuclear DNA content within pigeonpea. Plant Syst. Evol. 189: 211–216.
Pundir R.P.S. and Singh R.B., 1985a. Cytogenetics of F1 hybrids between Cajanus and Atylosia species and its phylogenetic implications. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 216–220.
Pundir R.P.S. and Singh R.B. 1985b. Biosystematic relationships among Cajanus, Atylosia, and Rhynchosia species and evolution of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 531–534.
Pundir R.P.S. and Singh R.B., 1985c. Crossability relationships among Cajanus, Atylosia and Rhynchosia species and detection of crossing barriers. Euphytica 34: 303–308.
Pundir R.P.S. and Singh R.B. 1986. Karyotype analysis of Cajanus, Atylosia and Rhynchosia species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 307–313.
Ratnaparkhe M.B., Gupta V.S., Ven Murthy M.R. and Ranjekar, P.K. 1995. Genetic fingerprinting of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) and its wild relatives using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 893–898.
Saxena K.B. and Sharma D. 1990. Pigeonpea: genetics. In: Nene Y.L., S.D. Hall and V.K. Sheila (eds.), The Pigeonpea, CAB International Publications, UK, pp. 137–157.
Schlarbaum S.E. and Tsuchiya T. 1984. The chromosomes of Cunninghamia konishii, C. lanceolata and Taiwania cryptomerioides (Taxodiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 145: 169–181.
Singh U. and Jambunathan R. 1981. Protease inhibitors and in vitro protein digestibility of pigeonpea Cajanus cajan (L.)Millsp. and its wild relatives. J. Food Sci. Technol. 18: 246–247.
Singh L., Gupta S.C. and Faris D.G. 1990. Pigeonpea: breeding. In: Nene Y.L., S.D. Hall and V.K. Sheila (eds.), The Pigeonpea, CAB International Publications, UK, pp. 373–399.
Stebbins G.L. 1958. Longevity, habitat and release of genetic variability in higher plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Plant Biol. 23: 365–378.
Van't Hof J. 1965. Relationship between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp. Cell Res. 39: 48–58.
Yeh M.F., Maekawa F. and Yuasa H., 1983. Chromosome numbers of Dunbaria villosa (Thunb.) Makino and Dumasia truncata Sieb. et Zucc. Chromosome Inf. Serv. 34: 5–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ohri, D., Singh, S. Karyotypic and genome size variation in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeonpea) and some wild relatives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49, 1–10 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013866611410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013866611410