Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Boundary-Layer Evolution on the Predictions of Ozone and the Efficacy of Emission Control Options in the Northeastern United States

  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of two different planetary boundary-layer (PBL) parameterization schemes – Blackadar and Gayno–Seaman – on the predicted ozone (O3) concentration fields using the MM5 (Version 3.3) meteorological model and the MODELS-3 photochemical model. The meteorological fields obtained from the two boundary-layer schemes have been used to drive the photochemical model to simulate O3 concentrations in the northeastern United States for a three-day O3 episodic period. In addition to large differences in the predicted O3 levels at individual grid cells, the simulated daily maximum 1-h O3 concentrations appear at different regions of the modeling domain in these simulations, due to the differences in the vertical exchange formulations in these two PBL schemes. Using process analysis, we compared the differences between the different simulations in terms of the relative importance of chemical and physical processes to O3 formation and destruction over the diurnal cycle. Finally, examination of the photochemical model's response to reductions in emissions reveals that the choice of equally valid boundary-layer parameterizations can significantly influence the efficacy of emission control strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seaman N.L.: 2000, Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2231–2259.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas, J. and Rao, S.T.: 2001, Uncertainties in episodic ozone modeling stemming from uncertainties in the meteorological fields, J. Appl. Meteorol. 40, 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sistla, G., Hao, W., Ku, J.Y., Kallos, G., Zhang, K., Mao, H. and Rao, S.T.: 2001, An operational evaluation of two regional-scale ozone air quality modeling systems over the eastern United States, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 945–964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alapaty, K., Olerud, D.T., Schere, K. and Hanna, A.F.: 1995, Sensitivity of regional oxidant model predictions to prognostic meteorological fields, J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 1788–1801.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz, E.N.: 1963, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Russell, A. and Dennis, R.: 2000, NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2283–2324.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao, S.T., Ku, J.Y., Berman, S., Zhang, K. and Mao, H.: 2001, Summertime characteristics of the atmospheric boundary-layer and relationships to ozone levels over the eastern U.S., Pure Appl. Geophys, in press.

  8. Alapaty K., Pleim, J., Raman, S., Niyogi, D.S. and Byun, D.W.: 1997, Simulation of atmospheric boundary processes using local-and nonlocal-closure schemes, J. Appl. Meteorol. 36, 214–233.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berman S., Ku, J.Y. and Rao, S.T.: 1999, Spatial and temporal variation of the mixing depth over the northeastern United States during the summer of 1995, J. Appl. Meteorol. 38, 1661–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, K., Mao, H., Civerolo, K., Berman, S., Ku, J.-Y., Rao, S. T., Doddridge, B., Philbrick, C.R. and Clark, R.: 2001, Numerical investigation of boundary layer evolution and nocturnal low-level jets: local versus non-local PBL schemes, Environ. Fluid Mech. 1, 171–208.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alapaty K. and Mathur, R.: 1998, Effects of boundary layer mixing representations on vertical distribution of passive and reactive tracers, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 69, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hogrefe, C., Rao, S.T., Kasibhatla, P., Kallos, G., Tremback, C.J., Hao, W., Olerud, D., Xiu, A., McHenry, J. and Alapaty, K.: 2001, Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: part 1-meteorological predictions, Atmos. Environ. 35, 4159–4174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, S.T., Sistla, G., Ku, J.Y., Zhou, N. and Hao, W.: 1994, Sensitivity of the Urban Airshed Model to mixing height profile. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AMS/AWMA Joint Conference on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology, Nashville, TN.

  14. Sistla, G., Zhou, N., Hao, W., Ku, J.Y., Rao, S.T., Bornstein, R., Freedman, F. and Thunis, P.: 1996, Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on urban airshed model predictions and ozone control strategies, Atmos. Environ. 30, 2011–2025.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dudhia, J.: 1993, A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State-NCAR mesoscale model: validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, J. Appl. Meteorol. 121, 1493–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blackadar, A.K.: 1979, High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. In: J. Pfafflin and E. Ziegler (eds.), Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 50–85, Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gayno, G.A., Seaman, N.L., Lario, A.M. and Stauffer, D.R.: 1994, Forecasting visibility using a 1.5-order closure boundary layer scheme in a 12-km non-hydrostatic model. In: AMS Tenth Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 18–20, Portland, OR.

  18. Byun, D.W. and Ching, J.K.S.: 1999, Science Algorithms of the EPA MODELS-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (MODELS-3) Modeling System, Report EPA/600/R-99/030, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Philbrick, C.R.: 1998, Investigations of factors determining the occurrence of ozone and fine particles in northeastern U.S.A. In: Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, pp. 248–260, Air & Waste Management Association and the U.S. EPA'ss National Exposure Research Laboratory, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, D. and Anthes, R.A.: 1982, A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer-sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data, J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 1594–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gery, M.W., Whitten, G.Z., Killus, J.P. and Dodge, M.C.: 1989, A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 12925–12956.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shafran, P.C., Seaman, N.L. and Gayno, G.A.: 2000, Evaluation of numerical predictions of boundary layer structure during the Lake Michigan ozone study, J. Appl. Meteorol. 39, 412–426.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J. and Rao, S.T.: 1999, The role of vertical mixing in the temporal evolution of groundlevel ozone concentrations, J. Appl. Meteorol. 38, 1674–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Research Council (NRC): 1999, Ozone photochemistry. In: Ozone-Forming Potential of Reformulated Gasoline, pp. 23–32, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 1991, Guideline for Regulatory Application of the Urban Airshed Model, Report EPA-450/4–91–013, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ku, JY., Mao, H., Zhang, K. et al. Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Boundary-Layer Evolution on the Predictions of Ozone and the Efficacy of Emission Control Options in the Northeastern United States. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 1, 209–233 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011513603066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011513603066

Navigation