The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 375–397

Objecting Morally

  • C.A.J. Coady
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1009745023500

Cite this article as:
Coady, C. The Journal of Ethics (1997) 1: 375. doi:10.1023/A:1009745023500

Abstract

Just war theory entails that some wars may be morally unjustifiable, and hence citizens may be right to object morally to their government's waging of a war and to their being compelled to serve in it. Given the evils attendant upon even justified war, this fact sharply restricts any “obligation to die for the state,” and raises important questions about the appropriate state response to selective conscientious objectors. This paper argues that such people should be legally accommodated, and discusses objections to doing so, in particular, the possible erosion of the state's capacity to wage justified war, the unfairness of granting such exemptions from military service, and the impossibility of determining genuinely conscientious objection.

consciencefairnessinscrutabilityjust warmixed motivesmoral free-ridingreligionselective conscientious objectionself-defence

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.A.J. Coady
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia