Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual Anatomy: From the Body in the Text to the Body on the Screen

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the transformations in anatomical representation introduced by the Visible Human Project, the first complete virtual anatomy object. By comparing the process of production of book based classical anatomy with that of the Visible Human Project, the paper identifies the medium specificity of anatomical knowledge, the extent to which its powers of demonstration and analysis are conditioned by the medium in which they take place. The paper argues that anatomy can be productively thought of as a kind of writing practice, in which material flesh is written into different media as traces. Because the production of such traces always involves the destruction of the body involved the paper also interrogates the biopolitical hierarchies involved in anatomical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackerman, M. (1991). The visible human project. Journal of Biocommunication, 18(2), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1983). Political anatomy of the body: Medical knowledge in Britain in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, F. (1984). The tremulous private body. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, L. (1995). Screening the body: Tracing medicine's visual culture. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., & Galison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations, 40, 81–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Two volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Keller, E. (1995). Refiguring life: Metaphors of twentieth-century biology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. (1987). Andreas Vesalius and the anatomy of antique sculpture. Representations, 17, 28–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S. (1991). The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science, 21, 279–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohne, K. H., Pflesser, B., Pommert, A., Riemer, M., Schiemann, T., Schubert, R., & Tiede, U. (1996, January). A virtual body model for surgical education and rehearsal. Computer, 25–31.

  • Hong, L., Kaufman, A., Wei, Y.-C., Viswambharan, A., Wax, M., & Liang, Z. (1995). 3D virtual colonoscopy. Proceeds of the IEEE symposium on frontiers of biomedical visualisation, Los Alamitos, IEEE CS Press: 26–32.

  • Hong, L., Kaufman, A., Liang, Z., Viswambharan, A., & Wax, M. (1996, October). Visible human virtual colonoscopy. Paper presented at the Visible Human Project Conference, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. (1995). Technology in the hospital: Transforming patient care in the early twentieth century. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapsalis, T. (1997). Public privates: Performing gynecology from both ends of the speculum. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchessault, J. (1996). The secret of life: Informatics and the popular discourse of the life code. New Formations, 19, 120–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. (1988). Death, dissection and the destitute. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., & O'Malley. C. (Eds.). (1950). The illustrations from the works of Andreas Vesalius of Brussels. Cleveland: World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawday, J. (1995). The body emblazoned: Dissection and the human body in Renaissance culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, B. (1993). Body criticism: Imagining the unseen in enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treichler, P., Penley, C., & Cartwright, L. (Eds.). (1998). The visible woman: Imaging technologies, gender and science. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C. (1996). AIDS and the body politic: Biomedicine and sexual difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. (1996). Mass mediauras: Form, technics, media. (A. Cholodenko, Ed.). Sydney: Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waldby, C. Virtual Anatomy: From the Body in the Text to the Body on the Screen. Journal of Medical Humanities 21, 85–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009070413872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009070413872

Keywords

Navigation