Skip to main content
Log in

Divorce, Children and the Courts:Evaluating the Use of the Parent Alienation Syndromein Custody Disputes

  • Published:
Expert Evidence

Abstract

Parent alienation is often a central issue incontested child custody cases and has become thesubject of significant debate. The debate centerspartly around the extent to which there is anidentifiable syndrome related to parent alienationsuch as the Parent Alienation Syndrome (PAS) proposedby Gardner (1998). According to the PAS, custodialparents will often act to denigrate their ex-spouse infront of their child to promote a dislike of the otherparent. These parental acts create an atmosphere ofalienation between the child and the non-custodialparent, and it is argued that this alienation willmanifest itself through the child's behavior. Thispaper argues that although parents often act in waysthat serve to alienate the child from the other parentin custody cases, there is very little empiricalevidence of a specific syndrome that accounts for thediverse behaviors that fall under the rubric of parentalienation. Specifically, current descriptions ofparent alienation as a syndrome do not meet acceptablescientific criteria levels related to reliability andvalidity and should be carefully scrutinized by thecourts. Future areas for empirical examination of PAS,as it relates to custody cases, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J.A. (1992) “Factors Relating to Custody, Visitation, and Child Support for Divorced Fathers: An Exploratory Analysis”, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 17: 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, E.P. and Brown, C.F. (1995) How to Help Your Child Overcome Your Divorce. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, L. and Conte, J. (1993) “Sexual Abuse Evaluations: Conceptual and Empirical Obstacles”, Child Abuse and Neglect 17: 111-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, G.F. (1993) “Expanding the Parameters of Parental Alienation Syndrome”, The American Journal of Family Therapy 21(3): 205-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M.E. and Davis, P. (1994) Children and Marital Conflict: The Impact of Family Dispute and Resolution. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. and Hedrick, M. (1994) “The Parental Alienation Syndrome: An Analysis of Sixteen Selected Cases”, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 21(3/4): 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R.E. (1982) “Interparental Conflict and the Children of Divorce and Discord”, Psychological Bulletin 92: 310-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, R. and McCombs, A. (1989) “The Nature of Inter-Parental Conflict of Married and Divorced Parents: Implications for Young Adolescents”, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 17: 235-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States (1923), 54 App. D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013.

  • Fulton, J.A. (1979) “Parental Reports of Children's Post-Divorce Adjustment”, Journal of Social Issues 35: 126-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.A. (1976) Psychotherapy with Children of Divorce. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.A. (1977) The Parent's Book About Divorce. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.A. (1998) The Parental Alienation Syndrome, 2nd edn. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannelli, P.C. (1980) “The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later”, Columbia Law Review 80: 1197-1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.W. (1998) Conducting Scientifically Crafted Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grych, J.H. and Fincham, F.D. (1990) “Martial Conflict and Children's Adjustment: A Cognitive-Contextual Framework”, Psychological Bulletin 108: 267-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouriles, E.N., Barling, J. and O'Leary, K.D. (1987) “Predicting Child Behavior Problems in Maritally Violent Families”, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 15: 165-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N.G. and Slobogin, C. (1987) Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, J.A. and Prinz, R.J. (1993) “The Incidence of Alleged Sexual Abuse in 603 Family Court Cases”, Law and Human Behavior 17(1): 95-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M.P. and Schwartz, R.D. (1984) Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods, 2nd edn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K.D. and Emery, R.E. (1984) “Marital Discord and Childhood Behavior Problems”, in Levine, M. and Satz, P. (eds.), Middle Childhood: Development and Dysfunction. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 345-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K.D. and Jouriles, E.N. (1994) “Psychological Abuse Between Adult Partners: Prevalence and Effects on Partners and Children”, in L'Abate, L. (ed.), Handbook of Developmental Family Psychology and Psychopathology. New York: Wiley, pp. 330-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N.R. (1988) “Legal Recognition of the Parental Alienation Syndrome”, American Journal of Family Therapy 16(4): 361-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B. and O'Leary, K.D. (1980) “Marital Discord and Childhood Behavior Problems”, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 8: 287-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D.C. (1997). “The Spectrum of Parental Alienation Syndrome (Part I)”, American Journal of Forensic Psychology 15(3): 23-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L.L. and Kaslow, F.W. (1997) Painful Parting: Divorce and its Aftermath. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoennes, N. and Tjaden, P.G. (1990) “The Extent, Nature, and Validity of Sexual Abuse Allegations in Custody/Visitation Disputes”, Child Abuse and Neglect 14: 151-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkat, I.D. (1994) “Child Visitation Interference in Divorce”, Clinical Psychology Review 14(8): 737-742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkat, I.D. (1995) “Divorce Related Malicious Mother Syndrome”, Journal of Family Violence 10(3): 253-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, J. and Lusk, R. (1993) “Psychological Testing in Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse”, Child Abuse and Neglect 17(1): 145-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L. and Dixon, R. (1979) “Child Custody: Legal Standards, and Empirical Patterns for Child Custody, Support, and Victimization After Divorce”, University of California at Davis Law Review 12: 473-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.T., Nathan, P.E., O'Leary, K.D. and Clark, L.A. (1996) Abnormal Psychology: Integrating Perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.L. (1994) “The Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Dangerous Aura of Reliability”, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 27: 1367-1383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Leary, K.D., Moerk, K.C. Divorce, Children and the Courts:Evaluating the Use of the Parent Alienation Syndromein Custody Disputes. Expert Evidence 7, 127–146 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008911200643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008911200643

Keywords

Navigation