Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A fundamental principle of psychophysics is that people's ability to discriminate change in a physical stimulus diminishes as the magnitude of the stimulus increases. We find that people also exhibit diminished sensitivity in valuing lifesaving interventions against a background of increasing numbers of lives at risk. We call this psychophysical numbing. Studies 1 and 2 found that an intervention saving a fixed number of lives was judged significantly more beneficial when fewer lives were at risk overall. Study 3 found that respondents wanted the minimum number of lives a medical treatment would have to save to merit a fixed amount of funding to be much greater for a disease with a larger number of potential victims than for a disease with a smaller number. The need to better understand the dynamics of psychophysical numbing and to determine its effects on decision making is discussed.
- “38,000 Shoes Stand For Loss In Lethal Year,” (1994) The Register-Guard, September 21, 6A.
- Cooper, A. (1994) All Things Considered. National Public Radio, Washington, DC
- Fechner, G. T. (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig
- Galanter, E. (1962) The Direct Measurement Of Utility And Subjective Probability. American Journal of Psychology 75: pp. 208-220
- Hersey, J. (1946) Hiroshima. Bantam, New York
- Humphrey, N. Four Minutes To Midnight. In: Lifton, R. J., Humphrey, N. eds. (1981) In A Dark Time. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21-22
- Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47: pp. 263-291
- Lifton, R. J. (1967) Death In Life: Survivors Of Hiroshima. Random House, New York
- Purvis, A. (1994). “All the Hatred in the World,” Time, June 13, 36–37.
- Rummel, R. J. (1995). “The Holocaust in Comparative and Historical Perspective.” Paper delivered at the conference on “The ‘Other’ as Threat—Demonization and Antisemitism.” Hebrew University of Jerusalem, June.
- Schell, J. (1982) The fate of the earth. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
- Stevens, S. S. (1975) Psychophysics. Wiley, New York
- Summers, C., P. Slovic, D. Hine, and D. Zuliani. (in press). “’Psychophysical Numbing’: An Empirical Basis for Perceptions of Collective Violence.” In C. Summers and E. Markusen (eds.), Collective Violence: Harmful Behavior in Groups and Governments.
- Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211: pp. 453-458
- Weber, E. H. (1834) De Pulsu, Resorptione, Auditu et Tactu. Annotationes Anatomical et Physiological. Koehler, Leipzig
- World News Tonight. (1994a). “Many Rwandan Refugees Are Dying of Cholera.” New York and Washington, DC: American Broadcasting Corporation, July 22.
- World News Tonight. (1994b). “U.S. Army Begins Water Purification in Rwanda.” New York and Washington, DC: American Broadcasting Corporation, July 26.
- Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume 14, Issue 3 , pp 283-300
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- decision making
- life saving
- value of life
- risk-benefit analysis
- psychophysical numbing
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305-2130
- 2. University of Oregon and Decision Research, Eugene, Oregon
- 3. Decision Research, USA
- 4. Willamette University, USA