Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of three institutions for monetary policy when central bankers have private objectives

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do different institutional arrangements for the central bank perform when central bankers have private objectives and society' objectives vary with time? This paper evaluates three benchmark monetary institutions from a constitutional perspective: (i) a contract with an inflation- or monetary target announcement; (ii) an inflation rule, and (iii) the laissez faire policy, i.e. the absence of any contractual arrangement. At the stage of institutional choice there is uncertainty about both society's mean inflation target and the central banker's future inflation target. A target announcement reveals the type of the central banker and solves the credibility vs. flexibility trade-off but it can not prevent that the central banker follows private objectives. The announcement-based contract is the optimal institution if (i) the initial uncertainty about the central banker's objectives is small and (ii) if unemployment is sufficiently high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backus, D. and Driffill, J. (1985). Inflation and reputation. American Economic Review 75: 530–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. and Gordon, D.B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri, M.B. (1985). Monetary policy games and the role of private information. American Economic Review 75: 1056–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (1993). Inflation targeting: The New Zealand and Canadian cases. Cato Journal 13: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratianni, M., von Hagen, J. and Waller, C. (1993). Central banking as a political principalagent problem. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 752.

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1993). Game theory, third printing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi, F. and Giovannini, A. (1989). Limiting exchange rate flexibility: The European Monetary System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, V. (1989). Exchange-rates and seigniorage. European Economic Review 33: 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüner, H.P. (1995). Optimal institutions for monetary policy: Contracts shocks and signaling. University of Konstanz, SFB 178 - Discussion Paper # 251.

  • Grüner, H.P. (1996). Monetary policy, reputation and hysteresis. Zeitschrift f¨ur Wirtschaftsund Sozialwissenschaften 116: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüner, H.P. and Hefeker, C. (1995). Domestic pressures and the exchange rate regime: Why economically bad decisions are politically popular. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 194: 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüner, H.P. and Hefeker, C. (1996). Bank cooperation and banking policy in a monetary union: A political economy perspective on EMU. Open Economies Review 7: 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefeker, C. (1994). German monetary union, the Bundesbank and the EMS collapse. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 191: 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1992). Optimal commitment in monetary policy: Credibility versus flexibility. American Economic Review 82: 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1993). Designing institutions for monetary stability. Paper presented at the Carnegie-Rochester Conference, Pittsburgh.

  • Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 1169–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel, R. (1993). Die Deutsche Bundesbank als Modell für eine europäische Zentralbank? In D. Duvendag and J. Siebke (Eds.), Europa vor dem Eintritt in die Wirtschafts-und Währungsunion, 23–79. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (1995). Optimal contracts for central bankers. American Economic Review 85: 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (1995b). Is New Zealand's Reserve Bank Act of 1989 an optimal central bank contract? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27: 1179–1191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24–42, D-53113, Bonn, Germany

    Hans Peter Grüner

Authors
  1. Hans Peter Grüner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grüner, H.P. A comparison of three institutions for monetary policy when central bankers have private objectives. Public Choice 92, 127–143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004939617564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004939617564

Keywords

Search

Navigation