Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of genotype-environment interactions on the inheritance of wheat yield in low-yielding environments

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complete F1 and F2 diallel crosses were used to investigate the inheritance of yield among eight Ugandan bread wheat lines grown in two low-yielding environments; one marginal because of the high incidence of yellow rust normally experienced there, the other a low-rust site. In the marginal, high-rust environment, mainly additive genetic variation was present, though in one season, when disease incidence was unusually low, non-additive variation due to dominance was also detected. Although yield was significantly higher at the low-rust site, no clear pattern of inheritance was apparent there. The results indicated that the low rust site was an intermediate environment, just below the crossover point of a crossover genotype-environment interaction. The implications of these results for wheat breeding in low-yielding and marginal environments in Uganda and elsewhere are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R.W. & A.D. Bradshaw, 1964. Implications of genotypeenvironmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci 4: 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J., 1988. Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Can J Plant Sci 68: 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J., 1990. Crossover genotype-environmental interaction in spring wheat. In: M.S. Kang (Ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction and plant breeding, pp. 42–51. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgi, B. & M. Perenzin, 1994. Diallel analysis to predict heterosis and combining ability for grain yield, yield components and bread-making quality in bread wheat (T. aestivum). Theor Appl Genet 89: 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, H-J., S. Rajaram & M. van Ginkel, 1996. CIMMYT's aproach to breeding for wide adaptation. Euphytica 92: 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, R.H., K.A. Lucken & R.C. Frohberg, 1971. F1 hybrids versus random F1 line performance and estimates of genetic effects in spring wheat. Crop Sci 11: 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide? Euphytica 40: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., 1996. Adaptation to low-high input cultivation. Euphytica 92: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. & I.H. DeLacy, 1994. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-byenvironment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor Appl Genet 88: 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravois, K.A., K.A.K. Moldenhauer & P.C. Rohman, 1990. Genotype-by-environment interaction for rice yield and identi-fication of stable, high-yielding genotypes. In: M.S. Kang (Ed) Genotype-by-environment interaction and plant breeding, pp. 181–188. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B., 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, B.I., 1954. The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10: 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., H.C. Becker & P.M.A. Tigerstedt, 1998. Quantitative and ecological aspects of plant breeding. Chapman & Hall, London, 275 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L., 1954. The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics 39: 767–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L. & V. Connolly, 1973. Selection for specific and general response to environmental differences. Heredity 30: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J.L., J.M. Perkins & H.S. Pooni, 1973. The incidence of epistasis in normal and extreme environments. Heredity 31: 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1973. Genetical structure of populations. Chapman & Hall, London, 197 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. & J.L. Jinks, 1982. Biometrical genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, 382 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, U. & S.N. Sharma, 1994. Combining ability analysis for yield and its components in bread wheat over environments. Wheat Information Service 79: 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., H-J. Braun & M. van Ginkel, 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breed for drought tolerance. Euphytica 92: 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. & S. Ceccarelli, 1995. Estimation of heritability using varietal trials data from incomplete blocks. Theor Appl Genet 90: 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, R.W., 1985. Stripe rust. In: A.P. Roelfs & W.R. Bushnell (Eds) The Cereal Rusts II, pp. 61–101. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virk, D.S. & P.S. Virk, 1986. The assessment of genetic variation for normal, self, and backcross families of a triple test cross of pure-breeding lines in wheat. J Agric Sci Camb 106: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoire, W.W., 1997. Yellow rust resistance of wheat cultivars in Uganda. Ph D Thesis, Department of Agricultural Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 111 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, S., 1964. Alternative analyses of the diallel cross. Heredity 19: 669–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, R.N.H., J.B. Thompson & M.A.M. do Valle Ribeiro, 1958. Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. 2. The use of a diallel cross analysis in yield prediction. Euphytica 7: 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagoire, W., Hill, J., Stølen, O. et al. Impact of genotype-environment interactions on the inheritance of wheat yield in low-yielding environments. Euphytica 105, 17–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003444509455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003444509455

Navigation