Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Differences in Spatial Task Performance as a Function of Speed or Accuracy Orientation

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance differences in spatial abilities as a function of gender may be modified by practice and relevant background experiences, as well as by directions given in laboratory situations. We examined whether a focus on speed or accuracy influenced performance in various spatial domains, using several different scoring techniques. Men and women from a small, predominantly White private college completed tasks of spatial perception, spatial visualization, and mental rotation under one of three conditions: speed-emphasis, accuracy-emphasis, or control. Participants also provided information concerning experiences pertinent to spatial ability. Results revealed relative parity between men and women on tasks of spatial visualization and spatial perception; speed/accuracy orientation did not alter these findings. Men outperformed women on mental rotation, but only when scored in a strict manner and when explicitly told to focus on accuracy, but not when directional emphasis was absent or geared toward speed. Self-reported background in math, sports, and the arts was unrelated to performance. The results are discussed in terms of women's efficacy beliefs about performing tasks explicitly designated as spatial in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alington, D. E., Leaf, R. C., & Monaghan, J. R. (1992). Effects of stimulus color, pattern, and practice on sex differences in mental rotations task performance. Journal of Psychology, 126, 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, W.W., & Duncan, D. (1990). Relationship between performance on the Everyday Spatial ActivitiesTest and on the objective measure of spatial behavior inmenand women. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S. (1995). Maternal employment and children's academic achievement: Parenting styles as a mediating variable. Developmental Review, 15, 212–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, M. P., George, J., & Inch, R. (1990). Sex differences and the role of figural complexity in determining the rate of mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 467–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., Hall, J., & Huff, C. (1990). Situational stress as a consequence of sex-stereotyped software. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (1996).Atest of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 338–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., & Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 18, 546–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1986a). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1986b).Adifferent answer to the question, do sex-related differences in spatial ability exist? American Psychologist, 41, 1014–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and childrens' ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, S. J., Ahlers, R. H., & Dugger, M. (1998). Eliminating gender differences through practice on an applied visual spatial task. Human Performance, 11, 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, K. A.,V & Berenbaum, S. A. (1991). Sex differences in spatial ability in children. Behavior Genetics, 21, 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehring, J., & Altman, J. D. (2000). Factors contributing to sex differences in the mental rotation task. Psi Chi Journal, 5, 39–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunneborg, P. W. (1982). Sex differences in self-assessments of everyday spatial abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents' differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the mental rotations test is not due to performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 26, 444–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M.G. (1979).Humanspatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N., & Bandura, M. M. (1983). Effect of age at puberty on spatial ability in girls: A question of mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 19, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know:Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosthuizen, S. (1991). Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrusic, W. M., Varro, L., & Jamieson, D. G. (1978). Mental rotation validation of two spatial ability tests. Psychological Research, 40, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, L. (1991). Girls and the learning of physical concepts. Finnish Journal of Education, 22, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: An effect of time limits? Brain and Cognition, 21, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Gender differences in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, B., & Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation an spatial ability in college students. Developmental Psychology, 22, 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scali, R. M., & Brownlow, S. (in press). Impact of stereotype activation and experimental instructions on spatial performance. Psi Chi Journal.

  • Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., & Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender: Instructional and stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharps, M. J., Welton, A. L., & Price, J. L. (1993). Gender and task in the determination of spatial cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. (1982). Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1018–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H., & Kleime, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: Assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1977). Sex differences in mental rotation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities:A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, K., Roberts. A. E., & Brownlow, S. (2000). Spatial perception and mental rotation produce gender differences in cerebral hemovelocity: A TCD study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catawba College, USA

    Robyn M. Scali & Jennifer L. Hicks

  2. Catawba College, USA

    Sheila Brownlow

Authors
  1. Robyn M. Scali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheila Brownlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer L. Hicks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scali, R.M., Brownlow, S. & Hicks, J.L. Gender Differences in Spatial Task Performance as a Function of Speed or Accuracy Orientation. Sex Roles 43, 359–376 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026699310308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026699310308

Keywords

Search

Navigation