Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutionalism, Division of Power and Transaction Costs

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to many democracytheorists, there is an unavoidabletrade-off between constitutionalism and theneed for political action. This papercriticizes that belief. Rather, it arguesthat a division of power, while sometimesentailing high political transaction costs,can nevertheless be beneficial andthat it is not necessarily the case that adivision of power does entail hightransaction costs. The analysis expands theframework of Buchanan and Tullock (1962).Constitutionalism is thus defended againstone of its main perceived deficiencies: itsbringing about gridlock. This does notalways happen, and when it does, it isoften a good thing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, B. (1993). Rights. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A.J. (1967). Ethics for logical positivists. In Language, truth and logic. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R. (1996). The political form of constitution: The separation of powers, rights and representative government. In Bellamy, R. and Castiglione, D. (Eds.), Constitutionalism in transformation: European and theoretical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M. and Stutzer, A. (2002). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Mimeo. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Public Choice Society in Belgirate, Italy. April.

  • Berggren, N. and Bergström, F. (1999). A constitutional analysis of selectivity in economic policy-making. In Berggren, N., Karlson, N. and Nergelius, J. (Eds.), Makt utan motvikt: om demokrati och konstitutionalism [Power without counterpoise: On democracy and constitutionalism]. Stockholm: City University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N. and Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2002). The economic effects of political institutions, with special reference to constitutions. In Berggren, N., Karlson, N. and Nergelius, J. (Eds.), Why constitutions matter. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (1997). Power and the people: A guide to constitutional reform. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic devices and desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1987). Constitution of economic policy. In Tollison, R.D. and Vanberg, V.J. (Eds.), Economics: Between predictive science and moral philosophy. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2000). Direct democracy, classical liberalism, and constitutional strategy. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society in Santiago, Chile. November.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2002). Why do constitutions matter?. In Berggren, N., Karlson, N. and Nergelius, J. (Eds.), Why constitutions matter. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Congleton, R.D. (1998). Politics by principle, not interest: Towards nondiscriminatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1975). On government, politics and society. In Hill, B.W. (Ed.). Brighton: Fontana/The Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione, D. (1996). The political theory of constitution. In Bellamy, R. and Castiglione, D. (Eds.), Constitutionalism in transformation: European and theoretical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlot, J. and Charlot, M. (1992). France. In Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (Eds.), Electioneering: A comparative study of continuity and change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R.D. (2000). The strategic constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1991). A new political system model: Semipresidential government. In Lijphart, A. (Ed.), Parliamentary versus presidential government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1988). Introduction. In Elster, J. and Slagstad, R. (Eds.), Constitutionalism and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1998a). Deliberation and constitution making. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1998b). Introduction. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J.D. (1998). Deliberation as discussion. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P. and Kirchgässner, G. (2000). Direct democracy, political culture, and the outcome of economic policy: Some Swiss experience. European Journal of Political Economy 16: 287-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P. and Matsusaka, J.G. (2000). Budget referendums and government spending: Evidence from Swiss Cantons. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Public Choice Society in Siena, Italy. April.

  • Feld, L.P. and Savioz, M.R. (1997). Direct democracy matters for economic performance: An empirical investigation. Kyklos 50: 507-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1994). Direct democracy: Politico-economic lessons from the Swiss experience. American Economic Review 84: 338-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal 10. 1043-1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (2000). The future of democracy: More direct citizen participation. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society in Santiago, Chile. November.

  • Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1995). Public expenditure on the arts and direct democracy: The use of referenda in Switzerland. Cultural Policy 2: 55-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1998). "Claro!": An essay on discursive machismo. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, A. and Thompson, D. (2000). Why deliberative democracy is different. Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 161-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (1999). Controlling the state: Constitutionalism from ancient Athens to today. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: M. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Jay, J. and Madison, J. (1778/1961). The federalist papers. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its level, method and point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica 4: 33-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W.J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics 12: 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermansson, J. (1988). The majority as a guarantee of the general will: A note on the constitutional theory of Rosseau. In Anckar, D., Nurmi, H. and Wiberg, M. (Eds.), Rationality and legitimacy: Essays on political Theory. Jyväskylä: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (1988). Precommitment and the paradox of democracy. In Elster, J. and Slagstad, R. (Eds.), Constitutionalism and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal code, real world: A rule-consequentialist theory of morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, N. (2001). The state of state: Invisible hands in politics and civil society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (1975). The independent judiciary in an interest group perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 18: 875-901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.-E. (1996). Constitutions and political theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.-E. and Ersson, S. (2000). The new institutional politics: Performance and outcomes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J.J. (1994). Presidentialism or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In Linz, J.J. and Valenzuela, A. (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively, J. (1975). Democracy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J.R. (1988). Transaction costs and the normative elements of the public choice model: An application to constitutional theory. Virginia Law Review 74: 471-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C. (2002). Two concepts of agreement. The Good Society 11: 72-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C., McLean, I., Fishkin, J. and Luskin, R. (2000). Can deliberation induce greater preference structuration? Evidence from deliberative opinion polls. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association.

  • Mainwaring, S. (1990). Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin America Reserach Review 25: 157-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S. and Soberg Shugart, M. (Eds.) (1997). Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J.G. (2000). Fiscal effects of the voter initiative in the first half of the twentieth century. Journal of Law and Economics 43: 619-650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1861/1972). Considerations on representative government. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.J. and Hammond, T.H. (1989). Stability and efficiency in a separation-of-powers constitutional system. In Grofman, B. and Wittman, D. (Eds.), The federalist papers and the new institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, E. (1998). The expanding public sector: A threat to democracy? In Eliasson, G. and Karlson, N. (Eds.), The limits of government: On policy competence and economic growth. Stockholm: City University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, E. (1999). Positive and normative aspects of direct democracy: The case of Sweden in a general context. In Berggren, N., Karlson, N. and Nergelius, J. (Eds.), Makt utan motvikt: om demokrati och konstitutionalism [Power without counterpoise: On democracy and constitutionalism]. Stockholm: City University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C. de Secondat (1748/1990). The spirit of the laws. Chicago: Encyclopaedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P. (1999). The impact of legislative institutions on public policy: A survey. European Journal of Political Economy 15: 1-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peczenik, A. (2002). Why constitution? What constitution? Constraints on majority rule. In Berggren, N., Karlson, N. and Nergelius, J. (Eds.), Why constitutions matter. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2001a). Do constitutions cause large governments? Quasiexperimental evidence? Unpublished manuscript.

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2001b). Political institutions and policy outcomes: What are the stylized facts? Unpublished manuscript.

  • Peters, T. (1996). Decision-making after the EU intergovernmental conference. European Law Journal 3: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. (1987). The constitution as an economic document. George Washington Law Review 56: 4-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1975). Federalism. In Greenstein, F.I. and Polsby, N.W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science, Vol. 5: Governmental institutions and processes. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  • Riker, W.H. (1982). Liberalism versus populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (Ed.) (1985). Reforming American government: The bicentennial papers of the committee on the constitutional system. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1967). The social contract and discourse on the origin of inequality. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited, part one: The contemporary debate. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration 66: 239-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1999). Governing Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S.C. (1998). Pathologies of deliberation. In Elster, J. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachendorfer-Schmidt, U. (2000). Introduction. In Wachendorfer-Schmidt, U. (Ed.), Federalism and political performance. London: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V.J. (1994). Rules and choice in economics: Essays in constitutional political economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V.J. and Buchanan, J.M. (1989). Interests and theories in constitutional choice.Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 49-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (2001). The consequences of popular participation in constitutional choice: Towards a comparative analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Wohlgemuth, M. (2002). Evolutionary approaches to politics. Kyklos 55: 223-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, K.W. and Just, T. (2000). Interest groups, referenda, and the political process: On the efficiency of direct democracy. Constitutional Political Economy 11: 147-163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berggren, N., Karlson, N. Constitutionalism, Division of Power and Transaction Costs. Public Choice 117, 99–124 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026105322993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026105322993

Keywords

Navigation