Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An underlying assumption in many models of coexistence and species response to fragmentation is the trade-off between dispersal and competitive abilities among species. Despite a well-founded theoretical ground for this assumption, the mechanism itself has not been as thoroughly explored. Empirical studies of the dispersal/competition trade-off have so far mainly concerned the dispersal distance of single offspring, whereas most models where the trade-off is assumed concern dispersal rate, i.e. the number of offspring that is dispersed outside a local patch per time unit. When species differ in fecundity this should also affect the dispersal rate. We therefore investigated different aspects of dispersal ability and competitive ability in the recruitment phase for 15 wind-dispersed Asteraceae species. A trade-off was found between dispersal ability at the offspring level, i.e. distance travelled by single seeds, and competitive ability in the recruitment phase, but no trade-off was found between dispersal ability at the brood level, i.e. the dispersal ability of single seeds in combination with fecundity, and competitive ability in the recruitment phase. The results were supported both by cross-species analysis and analyses by phylogenetically independent contrast. If this is a general pattern then it is troublesome for models making the assumption that there is a trade-off between dispersal rate and competitive ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, R.A. (1976) Fugitive species: experiments with fungi and some theoretical considerations. Ecology 57, 953-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J.E. (1997) Do imperfect trade-offs affect the extinction debt phenomenon? Ecology 78, 1597-1601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén, J. and Eriksson, O. (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81, 1667-1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. (1997) Colonisation dynamics and relative abundance of three plants species (Antennaria dioica,Hieracium pilosella and Hypochoeris maculata) in dry semi-natural grasslands. Ecography 20, 559-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. and Ehrlén, J. (2001) Landscape fragmentation and the viability of plant populations. In J. Silvertown and J. Antonovics (eds) Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp.157-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. and Jakobsson, A. (1998) Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species. J. Ecol. 86, 922-933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. and Jakobsson, A. (2000) Recruitment trade-offs and the evolution of dispersal mechanisms in plants. Evol. Ecol. 13, 411-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geritz, S.A.H. (1995) Evolutionary stable seed polymorphism and small-scale spatial variation in seedling density. Am. Nat. 146, 685-707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, S.K. and Tilman, D. (1990) Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology 71, 1144-1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. (1996) Competitive ability:definitions, contingency and correlated traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. Biol. Sci. 351, 1377-1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. and Landa, K. (1991) Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J. Ecol. 79, 1013-1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q., Brown, J.H., Valone, T.J. and Kachman, S.D. (2000) Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81, 2149-2155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1990) Dung and carrion insects. In B. Shorrocks and I.R. Swingland (eds) Living in a Patchy Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 127-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Ranta, E. (1983) Coexistence in a patchy environment: three species of daphnia in rock pools. J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 263-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. (1996) Phylogenies for ecologists. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 255-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. and Pagel, M.D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Country.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S.I. and Cain, M.L. (2002) Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization-competition trade-off. J.Ecol. 90, 616-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E.E. and Wilson, H.B. (1998) Running from trouble: long-distance dispersal and the competitive coexistence of inferior species. Am.Nat. 151, 578-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H.S. and MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53, 749-752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32, 571-577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, A. and Eriksson, O. (2000) A comparative study of seed number, seed size,seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88, 494-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, A. and Eriksson, O. (2002) Seed size and frequency patterns of understory plants in Swedish deciduous forests. Ecoscience 9, 74-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi,K. and Eriksson, O. (1999) Dispersal, recruitment and site occupancy of grassland plants in fragmented habitats. Oikos 86, 241-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, W.J.M., Guetta, E., van de Wiel, C.C.M., Vosman, B. and van den Berg, R.G. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships among Lactuca (Asteraceae)species and related genera based on ITS-1 DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 85,1517-1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leishman, M. (2001) Does the seed size/number trade-off model determine plant community structure? An assesment of the model mechanisms and their generality. Oikos 93, 294-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leishman, M. and Murray, B. (2001) The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities:model predictions and observed patterns. Oikos 94, 151-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. and Culver, D. (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 68, 1246-1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S.D., Walker, S.E. and Rypstra, A.L. (2000) A test for a differential colonization and competitive ability in two generalist predators. Ecology 81, 33413349.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M.A., Lindenmayer, D.B. and Dreschler, M. (1997) Extinction debts and risks faced by abundant species. Conserv. Biol. 11, 221-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan,R., Safriel, U.N. and Noy-Meir, I. (2001) Field validation and sensitivity analysis of a mechanistic model for tree seed dispersal by wind. Ecology 82, 374-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri, I. and Gouyon, P.-H. (1997) Evolution of migration rate and other traits. In I. Hanski and M.E. Gilpin (eds) Metapopulation Biology,Ecology,Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego,pp. 292-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri,I., Michalakis, Y. and Gouyon,P.-H. (1995) Metapopulation genetics and the evolution of dispersal. Am. Nat. 146, 202-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, W. and Weis, M. (1977) Resource partitioning and competition within a guild of fugitive prairie plants. Am. Nat. 111, 479-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M. (1995) Community structure in sand dune annuals:is seed weight a key quantity? J. Ecol. 83, 857-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M. and Westoby, M. (1997) Game-theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models. Oikos 78, 116-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. and Ellner, S. (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58, 29-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1991) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource:a cage experiment. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. London 43, 211-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam, J.G. (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38, 196-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson,K., Rickard, L.C., Hodkinson, D.J. and Rees M. (2002) Seed dispersal,the search for trade-offs. In J.M.Bullock, R.E. Kenward and R.S. Hails (eds) Dispersal Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 152-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1990) Constraints and trade-offs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58, 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1994) Competition and Biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75, 2-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Lehman, C.L. and Yin, C. (1997) Habitat destruction, dispersal, And deterministic extinction in competitive communities. Am. Nat. 149, 407-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., May, R.D., Lehman, C.L. and Nowak, M.A. (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. and Wedin, D. (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72, 685-700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.L., Zhang, J.G. and Liu, X.M. (2000) Competition and coexistence in spatially divided habitats. J. Theor. Biol. 205, 631-639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, P.A. and Platt, W.J. (1976) Ecological relationships of co-occurring goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae). Am. Nat. 110, 959-971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, M., Leishman, M. and Lord, J. (1996) Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. Biol. Sci. 351, 1309-1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, J., Wallace, R.S. and Jansen, R.K. (1995) Phylogenetic relationships and patterns of character change in the tribe Lactuceae (Asteraceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Can.J.Bot. 73, 1058-1073.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    Anna Jakobsson & Ove Eriksson

Authors
  1. Anna Jakobsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ove Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Jakobsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobsson, A., Eriksson, O. Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs. Evolutionary Ecology 17, 233–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025526903281

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025526903281

Search

Navigation