Skip to main content
Log in

Social Desirability and Self-Reported Anxiety in Children: An Analysis of the RCMAS Lie Scale

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are important applied and theoretical reasons for research into the association between social desirability and self-reported anxiety in young people. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between anxiety and social desirability in a large normative sample of 7- to 14-year-olds (N = 1,786). Participants completed the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale and their teachers rated children as anxious-not anxious according to specified descriptions. Results indicated that anxiety and lie scores do not correlate for either gender or age grouping. However, anxiety scores interacted with lie scores differently for males and females in terms of the agreement between children's and teacher's ratings of anxiety. Indications are that social desirability levels may in part explain the consistent discrepancies found between child and adult reports of anxiety in young people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnke, K., Silbereisen, R. K., Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O., (1986). What I think and feel: German experience with the Revised form of the Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 553-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadds, M. R., Spence, S. H., Holland, D., Barrett, P. M., & Laurens, K. (1997). Early intervention and prevention of anxiety disorders: A controlled study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

  • Davis, P. J. (1987). Repression and the inaccessibility of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 585-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. J. (1991). Gender differences in autobiographical memory for childhood emotional experiences. Paper presented to the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory, Cumbria, England.

  • Ferrando, P. J. (1994). Factorial structure of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale in a Spanish sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 693-699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, G. K., Spirito, A., & Yeung, A. (1994). Utility of the repressive defense style construct in childhood. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 306-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagborg, W. J. (1991). The Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale and social desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 423-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagborg, W. J. (1992). Prevalence and correlates of self-reported depressive mood among seriously emotionally disturbed adolescents. Psychological Reports, 70, 23-26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T. E., Schmidt, K. L., & Schmidt, N. B. (1996). Low-end specificity of childhood measures of emotional distress: Differential effects for depression and anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 258-271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattison, R. E., Bagnato, S. J., & Brubaker, B. H. (1988). Diagnostic utility of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2, 147-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, S, & Last, C. G. (1992). Do childhood anxiety measures measure anxiety? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 567-578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Paget, K. D. (1981). Factor analysis of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 352-359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Paget, K. D. (1983). National normative and reliability data for the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 352-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1979). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 271-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. O., Rodrigo, G., & Rodrigo, M. (1988). Factor structure of a Spanish version of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 281-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W. K. (1994). Structured diagnostic interviews. In T. H. Ollendick, N. J. King, & W. Yule (Eds.), International handbook of phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 293-315). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. (ed). (1990). Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A. (1990). The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In J. L. Singer (Ed.). (1990). Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., Chibaiwa, D., Majoni, C., Masukume, C., & Nkoma, E. (1990). Reliability and factor structure of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale in Zimbabwe. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 365-369.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dadds, M.R., Perrin, S. & Yule, W. Social Desirability and Self-Reported Anxiety in Children: An Analysis of the RCMAS Lie Scale. J Abnorm Child Psychol 26, 311–317 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022610702439

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022610702439

Navigation