Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Institutional Mission and Students' Involvement and Educational Outcomes

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although institutional characteristics are assumed to influence student learning and intellectual development, this link has not been confirmed empirically. This study examined whether institutional mission, as represented by Carnegie classification, is related to student learning and development. After controlling for student background characteristics, no meaningful differences were found in students' perceptions of the college environment, levels of academic and social involvement, integration of information, or educational outcomes by Carnegie classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Astin, A. (1968). Undergraduate achievement and institutional "excellence." Science 161: 661–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1969). What goes into academic planning? New research has implications for academic planning and the quest for "excellence. Coll. Univ. Bus. 47(2): 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1970). The methodology of research on college impact (I). Sociol. Educ. 43: 223–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1971). Open admission and programs for the disadvantaged. J. Higher Educ. 42: 629–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A., and Panos, R. (1969). The Educational and Vocational Development of College Students, American Council on Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L. (1976). Using Self-Reports to Predict Student Performance, The College Board, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdie, R. (1971). Self-claimed and tested knowledge. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 31: 629–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. (1972). Undergraduate educational experience. J. Educ. Psychol. 63: 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. (1974). Commuting Versus Residential Students: Overcoming Educational Inequities of Living off Campus, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. M., and Murrell, P. H. (1993). A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility. Res. Higher Educ. 34: 267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. (1969). The Impact of College on Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D. (1968). Growing Up in College, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices for covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3: 424–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning (2000). The NSSE 2000 Report: National Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice, Author, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning (2001). Improving the College Experience: National Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice, Author, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jőreskog, K. G., and Sőrbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.3, Scientific Software, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., Korn, H., Ellis, V., Madison, P., Singer, S., Lozoff, M., et al. (1968). No Time for Youth: Growth and Constraint in College Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., Hayek, J., Carini, R., Ouimet, J., Gonyea, R., and Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE Technical and Norms Report, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., and Hu, S. (2001a). Learning productivity at research universities. J. Higher Educ. 72: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., and Hu, S. (2001b). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Rev. Higher Educ. 24: 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., and Siegel, M. (2000). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Tentative Norms for the Fourth Edition, Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., Connolly, M. R., and Pace, C. R. (1997). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Revised Norms for the 3rd Edition, Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. (2000). Bringing the Carnegie classification into the 21st century. AAHE Bull. 52(5): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P., Antonio, A., Walpole, M., and Perez, L. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Res. Higher Educ. 39: 513–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R. (1964). Effects of various college characteristics on student aptitude test scores. J. Educ. Psychol. 55: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences, University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1985). The Credibility of Student Self-Reports, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1990). The Undergraduates: A Report of Their Activities and Progress in the 1980s, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1995). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Norms for the Third Edition, 1990, Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R., and Kuh, G. (1998). College Student Experiences Questionnaire, Fourth Edition, Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In: Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 1).Agathon, New York, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. (2001a). Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we even close? Change 33(3): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. (2001b). Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 42: 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. (1995). The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Res. Higher Educ. 36: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 38: 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. (2000). The influence of fraternity or sorority membership on students' college experiences and cognitive development. Res. Higher Educ. 41: 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G., and Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Res. Higher Educ. 42: 429–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann, J., and Beggs, D. (1974). A study of the validity of self-reported measures of academic growth. J. Educ. Meas. 11: 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, N. (ed.) (1962). The American College. A Psychological and Social Interpretation of the Higher Learning, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. C., and Volkwein, J. F. (2002). Comparing student performance and growth in 2-and 4-year institutions. Res. Higher Educ. 43: 133–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B., and Massey, W. (1996). Strategic Indicators for Higher Education, Peterson's, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P., and Pascarella, E. (1994). Living with myths: Undergraduate education in America. Change 26: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P., Rendon, L., Upcraft, M. L., Millar, S., Allison, K., Gregg, P., et al. (1994). The transition to college: Diverse students, diverse stories. Res. Higher Educ. 35: 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R., and Smart, J. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect student gains from college? Rev. Higher Educ. 25: 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In: Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 5), Agathon, New York, pp. 289–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D., McClelland, D., and Stewart, A. (1981). A New Case for the Liberal Arts: Assessing Institutional Goals and Student Development, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary R. Pike.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pike, G.R., Kuh, G.D. & Gonyea, R.M. The Relationship Between Institutional Mission and Students' Involvement and Educational Outcomes. Research in Higher Education 44, 241–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022055829783

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022055829783

Navigation