Abstract
Two visual-world eyetracking experiments were conducted to investigate whether, how, and when syntactic and semantic constraints are integrated and used to predict properties of subsequent input. Experiment 1 contrasted auditory German constructions such as, “The hare-nominative eats ... (the cabbage-acc)” versus “The hare-accusative eats ... (the fox-nom),” presented with a picture containing a hare, fox, cabbage, and distractor. We found that the probabilities of the eye movements to the cabbage and fox before the onset of NP2 were modulated by the case-marking of NP1, indicating that the case-marking (syntactic) information and verbs' semantic constraints are integrated rapidly enough to predict the most plausible NP2 in the scene. Using English versions of the same stimuli in active/passive voice (Experiment 2), we replicated the same effect, but at a slightly earlier position in the sentence. We discuss the discrepancies in the two Germanic languages in terms of the ease of integrating information across, or within, constituents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. J. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30(3), 191-238.
Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998).Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459-484.
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
Bader, M., & Lasser, I. (1994). German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: Evidence for immediate attachment. In C., Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing (pp. 225-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language, (pp. 273-312). New York, NY: Wiley.
Chambers, C. G., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 30-49.
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
Duebel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
Eberhard, K., Spivey-Knowlton, S., Sedivy, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language processing in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409-436.
Frazier, L. (1979). On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. Bloomington, IN: IULC.
Hemforth, B., & Konieczny, L. (Eds.) (2000). German Sentence Processing (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Vol. 24). Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoffman, J. E., & Surbramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
Kako, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). Verb meanings, object affordances, and the incremental restriction of reference. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 256-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. (in press) Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language.
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 631-662.
Koh, S. (1997). The resolution of the dative NP ambiguity in Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 265-273.
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
Marlsen-Wilson, W. D. (1975). Speech perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226-228.
Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII (pp. 601-618). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. CSLS lecture notes (No. 13). Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information, 1.
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publications.
Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251-270.
Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rayner, K., Monkie, G. W., & Ehrlich, S. F. (1978). Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 529-544.
Remington, R. W. (1980). Attention and saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 726-744.
Scheepers, C., Kamide, Y., & Altmann, G. T. M.(in prep.) The integration of verb restrictions and case information in projecting upcoming arguments in German: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements.
Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109-148.
Stevenson, S. (1994). Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 295-322.
Sussman, R. S., & Sevidy, J. C. (2001, September). Argument structure and the time course of gap-filling processes. Paper presented at the AMLaP-2000 conference, Leiden, Netherlands.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S., & Boland, J. (1990). Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. In Altmann, G. T. M. (Ed.) Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives (pp. 271-408). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Magnuson, J. S., Dahan, D., & Chambers, C. G. (2001). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 557-580.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217),1632-1634.
Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89-134.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preferences from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 528-553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C. & Altmann, G.T.M. Integration of Syntactic and Semantic Information in Predictive Processing: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from German and English. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 37–55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021933015362
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021933015362