Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a decision support system for stream restoration in the Netherlands: an overview of restoration projects and future needs

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stream restoration is one of the answers to the lowland stream deterioration. For making proper choices in stream restoration; one firstly needs to understand the complex spatial and temporal interactions between physical, chemical and biological components in the stream ecosystem. Several ecological concepts on the four dimensions, scale and hierarchy in a stream ecosystem are integrated into the 5-S-model. This model provides the theoretical backbone of the first outline of a decision support system for stream restoration. Stream restoration is developing fast in the Netherlands. In 1991, 70 projects were counted, in 1993 there were 170, and this number increased in 1998 to 206. Positive signs in this increase in the number of stream restoration projects are the increase in the amount of money, in background studies, in improvement of the selection process of stretches to be tackled, and the broadening of the objectives and measures. Negative signs are amongst others that measures often deal only with stream hydrology and structures in-stream. The catchment takes no part. Furthermore, bottlenecks often relate to finances and agreement between people and/or organisations. Finally, the first steps towards a decision support system for stream restoration are made. The system presented provides only information based on which measures should be taken. `Where and how' these measures need to be taken remains a challenge for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, T. F. H. & A. Starr, 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for ecological complexity. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, C., 1993. Evaluatie plasbermen Overijsselse Vecht 1987-1992. RIZA, nota Natuurvriendelijke oevers. Lelystad (in Dutch).

  • Boon, P. J., 1992. Essential elements in the case for river conservation. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. Wiley & Sons, Chichester: 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunke, M. & T. Gonser, 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., L. Wainger, C. Folke, & K. Maler, 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems. BioScience 43: 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duursema, G., 1999. Monitoring aanleg drempels Gasternese Diep. Rapport Zuiveringsschap Drenthe, Assen. 97-25: 1–15 (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features: viewing streams in a watershed context. Envir. Manage. 10: 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H. A., 1975. River zonation and classification. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), River Ccology. Studies in Ecology, Univ. Calif. Press 2: 312–374.

  • Hermens, E. M. P. & W. Th. Wassink, 1992. Natuurtechnisch beekherstel in Nederland. Landinrichting 1992/32 5: 8–15 (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M., 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1975. The stream and its valley. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problémes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considereés surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 12: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E., P. Bourgeron, R. Everett & I. Goodman, 1996. Ecosystem management: a landscape ecology perspective. Wat. Resour. Bull. 32(2): 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk, J. W., B. P. Bayley & E. R. Sparks, 1989. The Flood Pulse Concept in River-Floodplain Systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

  • Kondolf, G. M. & M. Larson, 1995. Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwat. Ecosystems 5: 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, P. & H. O. Hansen, 1994. European rivers and lakes. Assessment of their environmental state. European Environment Agency, EEA Environm. Monogr. 1, Copenhagen: 122 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, M., B. Peters & G. Kurstjens, 1998. De Vloedgraaf in de gemeente Susteren. Een voorbeeld van een natuurlijk heringericht en beheerd beekdal en een blik op de toekomst van het natuurlijk bekenbeheer. Waterschap Roer & Overmaas, Sittard, Stichting Ark: 15 pp. (in Dutch).

  • Naiman, R. J. & H. Décamps, 1990. The Ecology and Management of Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecotones. MAB series, Volume 4 UNESCO, Paris. Parthenon Publishing Group, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis, P. H., A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. de Nooij & E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478/Dev. Hydrobiol. 166: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Niell, R. V., D. L. DeAngelis, J. B. Waide & T. F. H. Allen, 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of the Ecosystem. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. C., B. L. Madsen, M. A. Wilzbach, C. H. D. Magadza, A. Paarlberg, A. Kullberg & K. W. Cummins, 1987. Stream managemen: emerging global similarities. Ambio 16: 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., 1977. The Fluvial System. JohnWiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedell, J. R., G. H. Reeves, F. R. Hauer, J. A. Stanford & C. P. Hawkins, 1990. Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Envir. Manage. 14: 711–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A. & J. V. Ward, 1988. The hyporheic habitat of river ecosystems. Nature 335: 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E., 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J. anim. Ecol. 46: 337–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 8(1): 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1990. Ecological characterization of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). Thesis, Wageningen: 255 pp.

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1999. Beken in beeld 1999. IBN, Wageningen, RIZA, Leystad. In: Water in Beeld 1999. Ministerie van Verkeer & Waterstaat, Den Haag: 25 pp (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., J. M. C. Driessen, W. Hoek van der, J. Klein de, A. Paarlberg, G. Schmidt, J. Schot & D. Vries de, 1995. Beken stromen. Leidraad voor ecologisch beekherstel. STOWA 95-03, Utrecht, WEW-06: 236 pp (in Dutch).

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., J. M. C. Driessen, H. G. Mosterdijk & J. A. Schot, 1998. The 5-S-Model, an integrated approach for stream rehabilitation. In Hansen, H. O. & B. L. Madsen (eds), River Restoration '96, Session lectures proceedings. International Conference arranged by the European Centre for River Restoration. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M. & R. C. Nijboer, 2000. Typology of macrofaunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K. The RIVPACS International Workshop, 16-18 September 1997, Oxford, U.K. Chapter 17: 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B., J. R. Webster & W. R. Woodall, 1977. The role of filter feeders in flowing waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 79: 506–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., 1989. The four dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 8(1): 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1983a. The intermediate-disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. In Fontaine, T. D. & S. M. Bartell (eds), Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Collingwood: 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1983b. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. In Fontaine, T. D. & S.M. Bartell (eds), Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Collingwood: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkgroep Beekbegeleidende Beplantingen, 1989. Hoofdrapport van de werkgroep beekbegeleidende beplantingen. Beplantingen langs waterlopen als beheersmaatregel. Mededelingen Landinrichtingsdienst, Utrecht. 179: 1–60 (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonderwijk, M., 1994. Monitoring van flora en fauna, morfodynamiek, waterbodemkwaliteit en beheerin beekproject “Midden-Regge fase I”. Waterschap Regge & Dinkel, Almelo: 95 pp (in Dutch).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Freshwater Ecology, Alterra, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen

    P.F.M. Verdonschot & R.C. Nijboer

Authors
  1. P.F.M. Verdonschot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R.C. Nijboer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verdonschot, P., Nijboer, R. Towards a decision support system for stream restoration in the Netherlands: an overview of restoration projects and future needs. Hydrobiologia 478, 131–148 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021026630384

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021026630384

Search

Navigation