Skip to main content
Log in

Impression Management and Faking in Biodata Scores Among Chinese Job-Seekers

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a repeated measure of 164 Chinese university seniors on an established biodata instrument, it was found that subjects would fake in order to increase their chances of getting a job offer in addition to simply giving a socially desirable impression. It was also found that those who scored low on the biodata scale had a much higher magnitude of faking behaviors as compared with those who scored high on the scale. Scores on an integrity scale were found to be predictive of the magnitude of faking. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relationship between faking and social desirability and their effects on criterion validities of biodata instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, R.A., M.W. Wetter, and D.T. Berry. (1992). "Detection of Underreporting of Psychopathology on the MMPI: A Meta-Analysis." Clinical Psychology Review 12, 509-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M.R. and M.K. Mount. (1993). "Autonomy as a Moderator of the Relationships Between the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance." Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 111-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M.R., M.K. Mount, and J.P. Strauss. (1993). "Conscientiousness and Performance of Sales Representatives: Test of the Mediating Effects of Goal Setting." Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 715-722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T.E. and A.L. Colquitt. (1992). "Potential Versus Actual Faking of a Biodata Form: An Analysis Along Several Dimensions of Item Type." Personnel Psychology 45, 389-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R.W. (1980). "Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Material." In H.C. Triandis and J.W. Berry (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology, vol. 2, pp. 389-444. London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, N.D., R.D. Goffin, N.G. Johnston, and M.G. Rothstein. (1994). "Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on Criterion-Related Validity and Individual Hiring Decisions." Personnel Psychology 47, 847-860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, R.E. (1971). "Item Susceptibility to Attempted Faking as Related to Item Characteristics and Adopted Fake Set." Journal of Psychology 77, 9-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E.F., M.A. McDaniel, and A.F. Snell. (1996). "The Validity of Non-Cognitive Measures Decays When Applicants Fake." Academy of Management Proceedings 127-131.

  • Gilmore, D.D. and G.R. Ferris. (1989). "The Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on Interviewer Judgments." Journal of Management 15, 557-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, J.R., S. Haanpera, and L. Sonkin. (1976). "Validity of a Biographical Information Blank Across National Boundaries." Personnel Psychology 29, 417-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L.M., N.K. Eaton, M.D. Dunnette, J.D. Kamp, and R.A. McCloy. (1990). "Criterion Related Validities of Personality Constructs and the Effect of Response Distortion on TheseValidities." Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 581-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E. and R.F. Hunter</del>. (1984). "Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance." Psychological Bulletin 96, 72-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K.M., J.E. Delery, and G.R. Ferris. (1992). "Differential Effectiveness of Applicant IM Tactics on Employment Interview Decisions." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22, 1250-1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S.P. andW.A. Owens. (1965). "Faking a Scored Life History Blank as a Function of Criterion Objectivity." Journal of Applied Psychology 49, 452-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A.N., R.R. Reilly, and C.J. Russell. (1991). "Faking Biodata Tests: Are Option-Keyed Instruments More Resistant?" Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 889-896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager, G.J. (1994). "Accuracy and Faking of Background Data." In G.S. Stokes, M.D. Mumford, and W.A. Owens (eds.), Biodata handbook, pp. 391-419. Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B.C. (1984). "The Relationship Between Need for Praise, Personality, and Delinquency." Journal of Research on Education and Psychology 7, 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H.R. and S. Kitayama. (1991). "Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation." Psychological Review 98, 224-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P.M. (1994). "The Influence of Life History Experiences on Vocational Interests and Choices." In G.S. Stokes, M.D. Mumford, and W.A. Owens (eds.), Biodata Handbook, pp. 535-554. Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D.S., C. Viswesvaran, and W. Korbin. (1995). "Meta Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Between-Subjects VersusWithin-Subjects Designs." Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

  • Ones, D.S., C. Viswesvaran, and A.D. Reiss. (1996). "Role of Social Desirability in Personality Testing for Selection: The Red Herring." Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 660-679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H.R., F.L. Schmidt, F.W. Erwin, W.A. Owens, and C.P. Sparks. (1990). "Biographical Data in Employment Selection: Can Validities be Generalizable." Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 175-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B.R. and M.F. Weigold. (1992). "Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management." Annual Review of Psychology 43, 133-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, M.J., A.M. Ryan, S.L. Stierwalt, and A.B. Powell. (1995). "Frame-of-Reference Effects on Personality Scale Scores and Criterion-Related Validity." Journal of Applied Psychology 607-620.

  • Stevens, C.K. and A. Kristof. (1995). "Making the Right Impression: A Field Study of Applicant Impression Management During Job Interviews." Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 587-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G.S., M.D. Mumford, and W.A. Owens. (eds.), (1994). Biodata Handbook. Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takata, T. (1987). "Self-Deprecative Tendencies in Self-Evaluation Through Social Comparison." Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27, 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, G.C. and P.F. Gierasch. (1980). "Fakability of an Empirically Derived Selection Instrument." Journal of Personality Assessment 44, 48-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.F. and C.Y. Chiu. (1987). "The Paradox Faced by Chinese Subjects: A Review of the Effects of Western Scales." Journal of Chinese Psychology 29, 113-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, W.J. and D.L. Paulhus. (1987). "Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Re-Conception." Academy of Management Review 12, 250-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zickar, M., J. Rosse, and R. Levin. (1996). "Modeling the Effects of Faking on Personality Scales." Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Law, K.S., Mobley, W.H. & Wong, CS. Impression Management and Faking in Biodata Scores Among Chinese Job-Seekers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, 541–556 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020521726390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020521726390

Navigation