Abstract
This research assessed the extent to whichattitudes toward women's rights are predicted by socialdominance orientation (SDO) and the political groupidentities socialist and capitalist. Respondents were 181 Australian undergraduates (54 males, 127females), most of whom were of European descent. Theresults of multiple regression analyses suggested thatSDO was the most consistent predictor of negative attitudes, although the extent to which itunderpins attitudes toward women's rights was found tovary for men and women: for men it was the onlysignificant predictor. Support was also found for theideological asymmetry hypothesis. The results are discussedwith reference to social dominance theory.
REFERENCES
Abraham, B., Feldman, S. S. and Nash, S. C. (1978). Sex roles, self-conceptions and sex role attitudes: Enduring personality characteristics or adaptation to changing life situations? Developmental Psychology, 14, 393–400.
Baker, L. A., Cesa, I. L., Gatz, M., & Mellins,C. (1992). Genetic and environmental influences on positive and negative affect: Support for a two-factor theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 158–163.
Barusch, A. S., & Spaid, W. M. (1989). Gender differences in caregiving: Why do wives report greater burden? The Gerontologist, 29, 667–676.
Bassoff, E. S., & Glass, G. V. (1982). The relationship between sex-role and mental health: A meta-analysis of twenty-six studies. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 105–112.
Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
Bem, S. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brems, C., & Johnson, M. E. (1990). Reexamination of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: The interpersonal BSRI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 484–498.
Brubaker, T. H., & Brubaker, E. (1992). Family care of the elderly in the United States: An issues of gender differences? In J. I. Kosberg (Ed.), Family care of the elderly: Social and cultural changes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Chang, C. F., & White-Means, S. I. (1991). The men who care: An analysis of male primary caregivers who care for frail elderly at home. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10, 343–358.
Chung, Y. B. (1996). The construct validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory for heterosexual and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 87–97.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Forshaw, K., & Shmukler, D. (1993). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: A critique of the masculinity model. South African Journal of Psychology, 23, 81–86.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory in women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gutmann, D. (1975). Parenthood: Key to the comparative psychology of the life cycle? In D. Ginsberg (Ed.), Life span developmental psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Gutmann, D. (1976). Individual adaptation in the middle years: Developmental issues in the masculine mid-life crisis. Journal of Geriatric Psychology, 9, 41–59.
Himmelfarb, S., & Murrel, S. A. (1983). Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 333–339.
Hirsch, C. (1996). Understanding the influence of gender role identity on the assumption of family care giving roles by men. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 42, 103–121.
Hyde, J. S., & Phillis, D. E. (1979). Androgyny across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 15, 334–336.
Jones, W. H., Chernovetz, M. E., & Hansson, R. O. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 298–313.
Jutras, S., & Veilleux, F. (1991). Gender roles and care giving to the elderly: An empirical study. Sex Roles, 25, 1–18.
Kaye, L. W., & Applegate, J. S. (1990a). Men as elder caregivers: A re sponse to changing families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 86–95.
Kaye, L. W., & Applegate, J. S. (1990b). Men as elder caregivers: Building a research agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Aging Studies, 4, 289–298.
Krames, L., England, R., & Flett, G. L. (1988). The role of masculinity and femininity in depression and social satisfaction in elderly females. Sex Roles, 19, 713–721.
Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 14, 397–430.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1982). Aging, the life course, and models of personality. In T. M. Field (Ed.), Review of human development. New York: Wiley.
McGee, J., & Wells, K. (1982). Gender typing and androgyny in later life: New directions for theory and research. Human Development, 25, 116–139.
Miller, B., & Cafasso, L. (1992). Gender differences in caregiving: Fact or artifact? The Gerontologist, 32, 498–507.
Neugarten, B. L. (1986). Adult personality: Toward a psychology of the life cycle. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Payne, F. D. (1987). 'Masculinity,' femininity and the complex construct of adjustment. Sex Roles, 17, 359–374.
Rebecca, M., Hefner, R., & Oleshansky, B. (1976). A model of sex-role transcendence. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 197–206.
Rewal, V., & Kapur, V. (1991). Sex roles: Masculinity, femininity and androgyny as a function of age, sex and city. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 7, 67–72.
Sinnott, J. D. (1977). Sex-role inconsistency, biology, and successful aging. The Gerontologist, 17, 459–464.
Solie, L. J., & Fielder, L. J. (1987–88). The relationship between sex-role identity and a widow's adjustment to the loss of spouse. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 18, 33–40.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attitudes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Stake, J. E. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and instrumentality in real-life settings: A new perspective on the benefits of androgyny. Sex Roles, 37, 541–564.
Stimpson, D., Neff, W., Jensen, L., & Newby, T. (1991). The caring morality and gender differences. Psychological Reports, 69, 407–414.
Stone, R., Cafferta, G. L., & Sangl, J. (1987). Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. The Gerontologist, 2, 616–626.
Szinovacz, M. (1989). Retirement, couples, and household work. In S. J. Bahr & E. T. Peterson (Eds.), Aging and the Family. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Thompson, E. H. (1994). Older men as invisible men in contemporary society. In E. H. Thompson (Ed.), Older men's lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thompson, E. H. (1997, November). Masculinities and Later Life: Envisioning Gender Diversity Among Older Men. Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Warr, P., Barter, J., & Brownbridge, G. (1983). On the independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 644–651.
Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 773–786.
Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225.
Windle, M. (1986). Sex-role orientation, cognitive flexibility, and life satisfaction among older adults. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 263–273.
Winnubst, J. A., Marcelissen, F. H. G., & Kleber, R. J. (1982). Effects of social support in the stressor-strain relationship: A Dutch sample. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 475–482.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heaven, P.C.L. Attitudes Toward Women's Rights: Relationships with Social Dominance Orientation and Political Group Identities. Sex Roles 41, 605–614 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018851606423
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018851606423