Skip to main content
Log in

Asked and Answered: Knowledge Levels When We Will Not Take “Don't Know” for an Answer

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pivotal claim in research on citizen competence is that the typical citizen knows very little about politics. Public opinion surveys provide a considerable body of evidence in support of this position. However, survey protocols with respect to factual questions about politics violate established norms in psychometric research on educational testing in that “don't know” answers are encouraged rather than discouraged. Because encouraging “don't know” responses potentially confounds efforts to identify substantive understanding, this practice may lead to the systematic understatement of political knowledge. We explore this possibility with data drawn from three split-ballot tests: one conducted as part of a survey in the Tallahassee, Florida, metropolitan area, one conducted as part of the 1998 NES Pilot, and one conducted as part of the 2000 NES. Results reveal that the mean level of political knowledge increases by approximately 15% when knowledge questions are asked in accordance with accepted practices in educational testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, Lewis R.(1988).Psychological Testing and Assessment,6th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben–Shakhar, G.,and Sinai, Y.(1991).Gender difference in multiple–choice tests:the role of differential guessing tendencies.Journal of Educational Measurement 28: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Frederick G.(1970).Principles of Educational and Psychological Testing. Hinsdale,IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. Beth, Nuttall, Ronald L.and Pezaris, Elizabeth.(1997).Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores:a comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties.Developmental Psychology33:669–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E.(1990).Popular representation and the distribution of information. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.),Information and Democratic Processes,pp.369–388.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J.(1942).Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true–false test. Journal of Educational Psychology33:401–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J.(1946).Response sets and test validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement6:475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J.(1950).Further evidence on response sets and test design.Educational and Psychological Measurement10:3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, George K.(1986).Educational and Psychological Measurement.New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X.,and Keeter, Scott (1996).What American Know About Politics and Why It Matters.New Haven,CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X.,and Keeter, Scott (1993).Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first.American Journal of Political Science37:1179–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, Robert L.,and Frisbie, David A.(1986).Essentials of Educational Measurement, 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice–Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, John A.(1990).Information and the electoral process.In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.),Information and Democratic Processes,pp.3–19. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A.(1996).Wrong questions,wrong answers:Measuring political knowledge.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,Chicago.

  • Gritten, Frances,and Johnson, Donald M.(1941).Individual differences in judging multiple–choice questions.Journal of Educational Psychology32:423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna, Thomas M.,and Downing, Steven M.(1993).How any options is enough for a ultiple–choice test item?Educational and Psychological Measurement53: 999–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, Mary, Moore, Robert L.,and Brown, Eleanor.(1995).Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics.Journal of Economic Education26: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Paul (1986).A Handbook of Test Construction.London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, R.Eric, Cashin, Jeffrey R.,and Theis, Kristina S.(1993).More evidence in favor of three–option multiple–choice tests.Educational and Psychological Measurement53:771–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrens, William A.,and Lehmann, Irvin J.(1984).Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology,3rd ed.New York: Holt,Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffery J.(2000).Reconsidering the measurement of political knowledge.Political Analysis8:57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffery J.(2001).Developing valid knowledge scales.American Journal of Political Science45:224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W.Russell (1986).The Paradox of Mass Politics:Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate.Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W.Russell, Just, Marion R.,and Crigler, Ann N.(1992).Common Knowledge:News and the Construction of Political Meaning.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally,Jum (1972).Educational Measurement and Evaluation,2nd ed.New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page,Benjamin I.,and Shapiro,Robert Y.(1992).The Rational Public:Fifty Years of Trends in Americans 'Policy Preferences.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin,Samuel L.(1994).The Reasoning Voter:Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns,2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherriffs, Alex C.,and Boomer, Donald S.(1954).Who is penalized by the penalty for guessing?Journal of Educational Psychology45:81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakter, Malcolm J.(1968a).The effect of guessing strategy on objective test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement5:217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakter, Malcolm J.(1968b).The penalty for not guessing.Journal of Educational Measurement5:141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakter, Malcolm J.(1969).Generality of risk taking on objective examinations.Educational and Psychological Measurement29:115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A.and Tetlock, Philip E.(1991).Reasoning and Choice:Explorations in Political Psychology.New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jullian C.,and Hopkins, Kenneth D.(1972).Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice–Hall.

  • Swineford,F.(1941).Analysis of a personality trait.Journal of Educational Psychology32:438–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, Robert L.,and Hagen,Elizabeth (1969).Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education,3rd ed.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky,Amos (1964).On the optimal number of alternatives at a choice point.Journal of Mathematical Psychology1:386–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley,Llewellyn,and Trimble, Otis C.(1936).The ordinary objective test as a possible criterion of certain personality traits.School and Society43:446–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller,John (1992).The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mondak, J.J., Davis, B.C. Asked and Answered: Knowledge Levels When We Will Not Take “Don't Know” for an Answer. Political Behavior 23, 199–224 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015015227594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015015227594

Navigation