Abstract
In the last twenty years, an international group of political scientists has coded nearly 2000 party manifestos with the help of one single coding scheme based on 56 categories which covers all main topics of these documents. However, there is a growing awareness of the shortcomings of the underlying coding scheme, such as overlapping and missing categories, which cannot be repaired without coding all manifestos all over again. Some have presented an alternative for manifesto-research by means of expert opinions on party policy positions, but these are unable to provide reliable time series for subsequent election years. The unborn solution to some of the problems with the coding scheme would be the computerised content analysis on digitalised party manifestos. This would open up a new universe of infinite possibilities for recodings and reanalyses. The extended consequences from full computerisation of textual analysis are mind boggling. But at the present, these possibilities are merely potentials as the computerised techniques are still underdeveloped. This article explores the possibilities for computerised content analysis in such a way that all postwar manifestos in established democracies can be compared with each other with the help of flexible coding schemes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexa, M. & Zuell, C. (2000). Text analysis software: commonalities, differences and limitations: The results of a review, Quality & Quantity 34(3): 299-321.
Brug, W. van der (1997). Where's the party? Voter's perceptions of party positions. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam (dissertation).
Brug, W. van der (1999). Voter's perceptions and party dynamics, Party Politics 5(2): 143-165.
Bara, J., Budge, I. & Tanenbaum, E. (1999). Monitoring democratic five-year plans: multiple coding of British manifestos and US platforms. University of Essex: ESRC-report.
Budge, I. (2000). Expert judgement of party policy positions: uses and limitations in political research, European Journal of Political Science 37(1): 111-113.
Budge, I. & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: issue effects and party strategies in 23 democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
Budge, I., Robertson, D. & Hearl, D. (eds) (1987). Ideology, strategy and party change: spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Budge, I. & Hofferbert, R. I. (1990). Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. Party platforms and federal expenditures, American Political Science Review 84(1): 111-131.
Budge, I. & H. Keman (1990). Parties and democracy. Coalition formation and government functioning in twenty states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budge, I., Klingemann, H-D, Volkens, A., Bara, J. & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: parties, electors and governments, 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castles, F. G. & Mair, P. (1984). Left-right political scales: some expert judgements, European Journal of Political Science 12(1): 73-88.
Fan, D. P. (1994). Information processing analysis system for sorting and scoring text. U.S. Patent 5,371,673.
Huber, J. & Inglehart, R. (1995). Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies, Party Politics 1(1): 73-111.
Keman, H. (1996). The Low Countries: confrontation and coalition in segmented societies. In: J. Colomer (ed.), Political Institutions in Europe. London: Routledge.
Keman, H. (ed.) (1997a). The politics of problem-solving in postwar democracies, Hampshire: MacMillan Press.
Keman, H. (1997b). Centre-space politics: party behaviour in multi-party systems. In: H. Keman (ed.), The politics of problem-solving in postwar democracies. Hampshire: MacMillan Press.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., de Ridder, J. A. & Bos, H. J. (red.) (1995). De democratie op drift. Amsterdam: VU-Uitgeverij.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., de Ridder, J. A. & Ruigrok, P. C. (1998). Paarse Polarisatie. De Slag om de kiezer in de media. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.
Kleinnijenhuis, J. & Pennings, P. (2000). Die Messung der Parteipositionen auf der Basis von Parteiprogrammen, Medienberichterstattung und Wahrnehmung durch die Whäler. In: J. van Deth & T. Koenig (eds), Europaeische Politikwissenschaft-ein Blick in die Werkstatt. Mannheimer Jahrbuch fuer Europaeische Sozialforschung, 4, Campus: Frankfurt/M.: pp. 57-86.
Kleinnijenhuis, J. & de Ridder, J. A. (1998). Issue news and electoral volatility: A comparative analysis of media effects during the 1994 election campaigns in Germany and the Netherlands, European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 413-437.
Kleinnijenhuis, J. & Rietberg, E. M. (1995). Parties, media, the public and the economy: Patterns of societal agenda-setting, European Journal of Political Research 28(1): 95-118.
Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R. I., Budge, I., Keman, H, Bergman, T., Pétry, F. & Strom, K. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder etc.: Westview Press.
Klingemann, H.-D. & Hofferbert, R. I. (1999). Remembering the bad old days: human rights, economic conditions, and democratic performance in traditional regimes, European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 155-174.
Krouwel, A. (1999). The Catch-all party in Western Europe, 1945-1990. A study of arrested development. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit (dissertation).
Laver, M. (ed.) (2001). Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London: Routledge. (ECPR Studies in European Political Science).
Laver, M. & Budge, I. (1992). policy and government coalitions. London: Macmillan.
Laver, M. & Garry, J. (2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts, American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 619-634.
Laver, M. & Hunt, W. B. (1992). Policy and party competition. London: Routledge.
Laver, M. & Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty government. The politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
McDonald, M. & Mendes, S. M. (1999). The policy space of party manifestos, ECPR Workshop, Mannheim (to be published in Laver 2001).
Mohler, P. & Zuell, C. (1998). Textpack. Short description for Windows 95/NT. Zuma, Mannheim.
Namenwirth, J. Z., Saris-Gallhofer, I. N., Saris, W. J. & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (1978). In search of semantic characteristics for machine coding, Methoden en Data Nieuwsbrief 3: 75-88.
Pennings, P. (1998). Party responsiveness and socio-economic problem-solving in Western democracies, Party Politics 4(3): 119-130.
Pennings, P. (1999). The utility of party and institutional indicators of change in consociational democracies. In: K. R. Luther & K. Deschouwer (eds), Party elites in divided societies. Political parties in consociational democracy. London: Routledge.
Pennings, P. & Keman, H. (1994). 'Links' en 'rechts' in de Nederlandse politiek. Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse politieke partijen 1993, Groningen: RUG: pp. 118-144.
Pennings, P., Keman, H. & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (eds) (1999). Doing research in political science. An introduction to comparative methods and statistics. London: Sage.
Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage.
Ray, L. (1999) A natural sentences approach to the computer coding of party manifestos. Mannheim: ECPR-paper (to be published in Laver 2001).
Roberts, C. W. (ed.) (1997). Text analysis for the social sciences. Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roberts, C. W. (2000). A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis, Quality & Quantity 34(3): 259-74.
Roozendaal, P. van (1997). Formation and termination of cabinets in West European multi-party systems. In: Keman, H. (ed.), The politics of problem-solving in postwar democracies. Hampshire: MacMillan Press.
Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy, Journal of Political Research 30(2), 155-177.
Strom, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies, European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 261-289.
Thomson, R. (1999). The Party mandate. Elections pledges and government actions in the Netherlands, 1986-1998. Amsterdam: Thesis (dissertation).
Volkens, A. (1994). Comparative manifestos project, dataset MRGr4. Programmatic profiles of political parties in 20 countries, 1945-1992. 4th updated edition, Berlin: WZB.
Vries, M. W. de (1999). Governing with your closest neighbour. As assessment of spatial coalition formation theories. Enschede: Print Partners Ipskamp.
Witschge, T. (2000). Computergestuurd coderen en analyseren van partijprogramma's. Verslag van de onderzoeksstage in het kader van het project 'coderen en analyseren van verkiezingsprogramma's'. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Department of Political Science.
Wijck, P. van (1991). Inkomensverdeling in Nederland. Amsterdam: Thesis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pennings, P., Keman, H. Towards a New Methodology of Estimating Party Policy Positions. Quality & Quantity 36, 55–79 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014380123135
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014380123135